The Only Hope for Young Girls to Marry Well is the Home Fellowship Movement
After about eight years of researching the Reformation, viz, Protestantism, I can tell you that its orthodoxy gets nothing right except for facts complicit in first-degree theological felonies. However, most of the time orthodoxy is blatantly false on its face without any confusion concerning facts.
I was recently reminded of Protestantism’s plenary life-failure when thinking about the fact that Susan went to Cedarville University for four years and was only asked out once. Oh, and before we move on, let me defend the “plenary life-failure” statement. Where do I get that? Well, from the leading evangelical scholars of our day. Do we not hear them say constantly that we Christians are “train wrecks”? Their words—not mine. Is a train wreck some kind of partial failure? Sorry, words mean things.
So, in the looks department, the post picture speaks for itself, and she was a 16-year-old high school graduate which speaks to her intelligence. And everyone knows about Susan’s personality. I state this for two purposes: it is indicative of what we would expect from Protestant offspring and their utter inability to know a good catch in plain sight because they are generally confused about life to begin with. And secondly, some encouragement for young Protestant girls born into unfortunate circumstances; trust me, it’s not you.
Never, never, never let your daughter marry a Protestant. Susan and I do our share of marriage counseling and we see what one would expect coming from Protestant orthodoxy, but unfortunately, most of the situations we experience are post-ACBC (Association of Certified Biblical Counselors) counseling which brings the situation to a point of utter disrepair.
Therefore, should your daughters choose from the secular realm instead? That question is best answered by considering the choice we have in this upcoming presidential election. If between those two, there is less damnation if they go secular.
To be frank, your daughter’s best chance at marrying a thinker is the Home Fellowship movement which promotes independent thinking and freedom to seek God according to one’s own conscience. This is why the Home Fellowship movement must be aggressively promoted and developed.
Do it for our daughters; save them from marrying a train wreck which seems like a really bad idea to me.
paul
The Magnum Opus of the Reformation: Martin Luther’s Heidelberg Disputation; Part 5
Connecting the Dots: Tullian Tchividjian and Luther’s Theologian of the Cross Listen to audio or download audio file. That’s pastor Tullian Tchividjian… …welcome truth lovers to Blog Talk radio .…
Source: The Magnum Opus of the Reformation: Martin Luther’s Heidelberg Disputation; Part 5
The Horrible Protestant Doctrine of Mortification and Vivification
Like any other super cult, Protestantism has hijacked and redefined every biblical definition of words and concepts from front cover to back cover. Any denomination that believes the clergy has aut…
Source: The Horrible Protestant Doctrine of Mortification and Vivification
TANC Ministry Roundup: Sunday 10/30/16 @ 4PM Expanded with Program Prep
A lot has been happening with TANC Ministries in the past couple of weeks. Susan and I are very busy and bemoan the reality that we don’t have time to chime in on all of the exciting changes going on.
Therefore, we will be using this program to catch up on recent posts on paulspassingthoughts.com blog and the encouragement we are receiving from new friends. There will also be an overview of our various ministries and an announcement regarding a new one.
Do call in and join the fun: (347) 855-8317
Live Link: Sunday 10/30/2016 @ 4pm
Topics:
Upcoming mission trip.
Present ministries and a new one.
The Weekend Gospel Challenge
Recent posts by Andy Young.
Recent Posts by Paul
https://paulspassingthoughts.com/2016/10/16/a-no-brainer-god-is-but-who-is-he-the-tanc-journey/
https://paulspassingthoughts.com/2016/10/12/some-clarification-on-the-love-story-post/ We are to function according to love not “under law” but this does not exclude the practical responses to abuse, tyranny, and justice. Our focus is the positive outworking of love, not sin-sniffing.
https://paulspassingthoughts.com/2016/10/09/the-protestant-ruse-donald-trump-death-and-taxes/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=cide
Home fellowships are no longer an alternative, but a biblical mandate.
https://paulspassingthoughts.com/2016/10/13/why-going-to-church-is-disobedience-against-god/
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/a-sample-statement-on-regular-church-attendance
New friends and old ones.
Comment from “John”:
“Well, I hope there is going to be a post-recording link/clip available.
This site has crept into my heart for many reasons: It promotes people to think for themselves, there are Andy’s intellectual yet perspicuous articles, and there are Paul’s unexpected angles. But, the biblical truth is found here too, in abundance; and the love for those who are lost is most obvious. And Jesus Christ is glorified, and that’s the clincher for me. And the true, uncomplicated, biblical gospel is presented all the time.
And I wonder how many people actually know the purpose of The Potter’s House. I was touched when I found out.
I always thought I was the only one in this universe (parallel or otherwise) who was not able to fit into the institutionalized church and all its diabolical traps; so, great was my joy when I stumbled across PPT and found there were others too. And not just that, but others who actually helped people escape the man-made shackles of “church” while encouraging one to be part of the body of Christ in a way that we are supposed to be.
I expect a signed copy of the “Institutes of the Christian Religion” by Calvin (peace be upon him) for my little comment. Or a bang on the ear.”
Why Hillary will win, and why the American people elect presidents of the baser sort.
The future of Capitalism according to the Bible.
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/10/14/spain-no-government-economy-booming_n_12489226.html
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+18
http://biblehub.com/1_thessalonians/5-3.htm
http://biblehub.com/revelation/6-4.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide
It’s a box, not a boat. A look at Ken Ham’s ark.
The ark was a huge floating box…period. So, is it any big deal if it is presented as an elaborate boat contrary to Scripture? What’s the big deal?
https://arkencounter.com/about/
https://ncse.com/cej/4/1/impossible-voyage-noahs-ark
In the first place, the analogy with the Seven Wonders does not hold. Only one, the Great Pyramid of Cheops, comes within two thousand years of Noah’s day, and it is really the only one whose construction could conceivably approach the level of sophistication of the ark. But the Great Pyramid did not spring de novo from the desert sands; rather, it was the culmination of over a century of architectural evolution, beginning when the “experimenting genius,” Imhotep, inspired by the ziggurats of Babylon, built the Step Pyramid around 2680 BC, passing through some intermediate step pyramids to the Bent Pyramid of Snofru, then the first true pyramid, and finally the masterpiece at Cheop (Stewart, pp. 35-39).
On the other hand, in an era when hollowed-out logs and reed rafts were the extent of marine transport, a vessel so massive appeared that the likes of it would not be seen again until the mid-nineteenth century AD. Before he could even contemplate such a project, Noah would have needed a thorough education in naval architecture and in fields that would not arise for thousands of years such as physics, calculus, mechanics, and structural analysis. There was no shipbuilding tradition behind him, no experienced craftspeople to offer advice. Where did he learn the framing procedure for such a Brobdingnagian structure? How could he anticipate the effects of roll, pitch, yaw, and slamming in a rough sea? How did he solve the differential equations for bending moment, torque, and shear stress?
Ancient shipbuilding did achieve a considerable level of technological sophistication, so much so that marine archaeologists are divided over its history (Basch, p. 52). But this was for vessels that were dinghies compared to the ark, and this skill emerged slowly over many centuries: nearly a millennium passed while Egyptian boat lengths increase from 150 to 200 feet (Casson, p. 17). Despite this, the craft remained a prescientific art, acquired through long years of apprenticeship and experience, and disasters at sea due to faulty design were so persistent that the impetus was strong for a more scientific approach (Rawson and Tupper, p. 2). Obviously, the astronomical leap in size, safety, and skill required by Noah is far too vast for any naturalistic explanation.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+5:32-10:1
Addendums:
3 comments