Paul's Passing Thoughts

Tchividjian Booted from The Gospel Coalition for Being Too Concise

Posted in Uncategorized by pptmoderator on January 8, 2015

PPT HandleOriginally posted May 21, 2014

“Tullian Tchividjian is John Calvin. Period.”   

Be sure of this: Tullian Tchividjian thoroughly understands Reformed doctrine and its gospel. Tchividjian doesn’t believe one whit different from anybody who writes or speaks for The Gospel Coalition, and they ALL know it.

The problem with TT is that he does not follow the philosopher king script of nuance for the sake of the totally depraved herd that is “not ready” for the true Reformed gospel of justification by faith…plus the dirty little secret of faith alone for both justification and sanctification. It’s like total depravity this, and total depravity that, and “oh, we forgot to mention that includes the saints as well.”

TT is not nuanced enough. In this interview here, it is absolutely clear that this is the reason he was sent packing. Because of him, The Gospel Coalition, T4G, and others have to recruit sanctification gurus Jerry Wragg, Kevin DeYoung, and Mike Fabarez to cleanup his mess and calm the mindless totally depraved zombie sheep. They are tired of cleaning up the messiness of questions raised as a result of TT’s accurate articulation of the Reformed gospel.

There is only one thing better than a rank antinomian, an honest one. Charles Spurgeon once said that Calvinism isn’t a nickname, Calvinism is the gospel. Let me take that a step further for our purposes: Tullian Tchividjian is John Calvin. Period. I will debate anyone out there who has a problem with TT’s Calvinism  and will show clearly from the Institutes that TT is spot on. Get over it. Please debate me on this, you will lose.

In my disdain for the Neo-Calvinist movement, a weird respect is floating to the top for the few who know what Calvin really believed and are honest about it. In fact, who else is there other than TT and Joseph Prince? (see here for explanation). How bad is it when I have to admit that I respect these guys because A, they know what they are talking about, and B, they are honest about it? Prince’s life application is beside the point, he understands the Reformed version of justification by faith, and the rest of the story mostly untold.

The two other camps annoy me to no end: those who think  there is a difference between New Calvinism and Old Calvinism, and for that matter, Sonship theology as well, and those who know grade-A-well that there is no difference and are lying about it. I have also lost all patience with those who think they can help the spiritually abused while retaining some supposedly respectable remnant of Reformed theology. Name one aspect that passes a grammatical interpretation of Scripture: it’s not there.

So there it is. TT is very important to this ministry because people have to know what they believe before you can convince them. We think followers of TT know what they believe. The rest? It’s really just a massively confused personality cult with a plethora of discernment bloggers adding to the confusion by dissecting all of the symptoms.

Get with the program: it’s either Tullian or something else.

paul

It’s Official: There is Nothing More Mindless Than a Protestant

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on September 21, 2014

You can’t make this stuff up. RC Sproul’s Ligonier ministry is sponsoring a Caribbean study cruise and guess what the theme is?

Our theme will be “Christ’s call to endure persecution and suffering faithfully.”

That is, according to emails I have received, before Julie Anne Smith of Spiritual Sounding Board.com and others began mocking Sproul et al on Twitter. The post was then changed to…

Our theme will be “Persevering in the Christian Life,”

Better?

If one signs up for the cruise in which the depths of suffering will be plunged, admission to the 2015 Ligonier National Conference is free and features the usual who’s who of the Neo-Calvinist movement. The theme there is…

We live in a day of darkness, when the gospel and the church are under attack on every front.

I sent my own tweet to one of the speakers in regard to that theme.

Tweet 1

And when are these guys ever home pasturing their own churches? Let me get this straight: you can pastor a church, be a conference superstar, and supply the spiritual needs of your own family as well? Wow, I guess that’s why they make the big bucks.

I can only compare the mass mindlessness that we are witnessing today to Germany during the rise of Adolf Hitler. It’s the same kind of mindless following on a mass scale.

paul

Lying About Tchividjian: Exhibit A; John Piper and “Infused Grace”

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on May 26, 2014

The Gospel Coalition has parted ways with Tullian Tchividjian because he doesn’t have enough veiled honesty about John Calvin’s antinomianism. Like Calvin, and especially Luther, Tullian doesn’t have any use for the law save its ability to show us how wretched we are, and that is making the herd uneasy. Tchividjian continually puts the Calvinist cartel in a position of calming the herd.

Keep in mind that while Kevin DeYoung is out there calming the herd by talking about sanctification in a justification way, and frankly, telling dog-faced lies, John Piper and the Reformed issue of infused grace lurks in the background. What is it?

Basically, according to the elder statesman of Neo-Calvinism, whom no one will lay a hand on, the primary difference between Rome and Evangelicalism, and the very crux of the Reformation, is the issue of infused grace. Infused grace, what Rome is guilty of according to Calvinists, is the idea that there is goodness in the believer INCLUDING the very works of Christ. So, this view not only has a problem with goodness (infused grace) being inside the believer, this view even has a problem with the idea that Christ works within us! ALL righteousness is outside of the believer. This is Luther’s alien righteousness; sound familiar?

No matter how good Kevin DeYoung sounds in proffering obedientism in sanctification—keep in mind that this is what he really believes. That is why he and the whole lot are a bunch of stinking liars. Again, their problem with Tchividjian is that he is telling like it is about the true Reformed gospel.

“But Paul, how in the world does that supposedly work in real life?” I explain it in “Pictures of Calvinism,” but I will reiterate it here. Yes, yes, I understand that they talk about “Christ in us” and “us in Christ” and the “vital union,” but they by no means mean what they say with those words. ALL of that is…By faith…, and now we must discuss what their definition of faith is. Faith is like an eye that only sees outward, and is able to experience righteousness, but not participate in it. It’s like standing in the rain: you feel the rain, you experience the rain, but you have no control over the rain, the rain is something that is done to you, but you don’t do anything to the rain. If you could do anything to the rain, well, that means you can create righteousness.

Another way this is stated is, “heart change.” That doesn’t mean we actually change. “Heart change” is a changed capacity, or increased capacity to experience “vivification.” Mortification and vivification is a Reformed doctrine that defines sanctification as a perpetual death and rebirth that increases our capacity to experience in part the actual glorification that we will experience when we are resurrected.

Mortification, a deeper and deeper understanding of our need for grace via meditating on our depravity as exposed in the Bible, leads to death, and a subsequent resurrection/rebirth. This is what the Reformed mean by, “living by the gospel.” It is a perpetual death and resurrection, or “living by the cross.” It fuses justification, sanctification, and glorification together into a progressive experience culminated by full glory. Spiritual growth is defined by an increased capacity to experience the joy of our future glory.

Vivification

In covering for the mess that Tchividjian makes with his honesty, the Calvinist cartel dances around all of this by redefining ALL of the known terms and adding many.

My case for this is thoroughly documented in Pictures of Calvinism and It’s Not About Election. The ebooks are below.

Pictures of Calvinism

It’s Not About Election ebook

Progressive Justification: It’s Life Application 

 

 

Calvinist Liars Attempt to make Tullian Tchividjian a Scapegoat

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on May 23, 2014

ppt-jpeg4I have compiled a lot of transcripts for a future post that will address the T4G/TGC damage control crew of  Kevin DeYoung, Jerry Wragg, and Mike Fabarez. Oh, and due to this post by Rick Phillips, I will add him to the list.

The Rick Phillips post confirms my position: Tchividjian was given the boot for his views on sanctification, which trust me, are the exact same as the rest of that bunch. Again, their problem with Tchividjian is the fact that he isn’t nuanced enough. All of the jargon about New Calvinists (the contemporary expression of authentic Calvinism) believing in obedience, effort in sanctification, etc., is disingenuous and for the most part outright deception.

Since Phillips wrote some real whoppers in his post, I will use it as a basis for the article which I hope to post by the first of next week. For instance, on the one hand, and per their modus operandi, Phillips claims to endorse obedience, effort, etc., in sanctification by…

the power of grace through faith in Christ.

Got that? “Grace” is code for justification. “Through faith in Christ” is code for faith alone in sanctification. These lying hypocrites believe in sanctification by justification just like Tchividjian does. The blog that Phillips writes for, Reformation 21, also proffers the traditional Reformed view of mortification and vivification which is also exactly what Tchividjian believes. Through “deep repentance,” or a “lifestyle of repentance,” viz, mortification, we EXPERINCE vivification which is the joy of our original salvation. It’s not us doing the actual obedience, we are only experiencing it. The language used is usually, “we are transformed into Christ’s image” etc. It is the mere experience of “spiritual transformation” and “heart change.” If you note the words they use carefully, they don’t actually say that we change.

Though I have a lot on my plate right now, I can’t let this treachery go unchallenged. These guys don’t believe anything different than Tchividjian. Lord willing, I will make the case next week.

paul

 

Tchividjian Booted from The Gospel Coalition for Being Too Concise

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on May 21, 2014

ppt-jpeg4“Tullian Tchividjian is John Calvin. Period.”   

Be sure of this: Tullian Tchividjian thoroughly understands Reformed doctrine and its gospel. Tchividjian doesn’t believe one whit different from anybody who writes or speaks for The Gospel Coalition, and they ALL know it.

The problem with TT is that he does not follow the philosopher king script of nuance for the sake of the totally depraved herd that is “not ready” for the true Reformed gospel of justification by faith…plus the dirty little secret of faith alone for both justification and sanctification. It’s like total depravity this, and total depravity that, and “oh, we forgot to mention that includes the saints as well.”

TT is not nuanced enough. In this interview here, it is absolutely clear that this is the reason he was sent packing. Because of him, The Gospel Coalition, T4G, and others have to recruit sanctification gurus Jerry Wragg, Kevin DeYoung, and Mike Fabarez to cleanup his mess and calm the mindless totally depraved zombie sheep. They are tired of cleaning up the messiness of questions raised as a result of TT’s accurate articulation of the Reformed gospel.

There is only one thing better than a rank antinomian, an honest one. Charles Spurgeon once said that Calvinism isn’t a nickname, Calvinism is the gospel. Let me take that a step further for our purposes: Tullian Tchividjian is John Calvin. Period. I will debate anyone out there who has a problem with TT’s Calvinism  and will show clearly from the Institutes that TT is spot on. Get over it. Please debate me on this, you will lose.

In my disdain for the Neo-Calvinist movement, a weird respect is floating to the top for the few who know what Calvin really believed and are honest about it. In fact, who else is there other than TT and Joseph Prince? (see here for explanation). How bad is it when I have to admit that I respect these guys because A, they know what they are talking about, and B, they are honest about it? Prince’s life application is beside the point, he understands the Reformed version of justification by faith, and the rest of the story mostly untold.

The two other camps annoy me to no end: those who think  there is a difference between New Calvinism and Old Calvinism, and for that matter, Sonship theology as well, and those who know grade-A-well that there is no difference and are lying about it. I have also lost all patience with those who think they can help the spiritually abused while retaining some supposedly respectable remnant of Reformed theology. Name one aspect that passes a grammatical interpretation of Scripture: it’s not there.

So there it is. TT is very important to this ministry because people have to know what they believe before you can convince them. We think followers of TT know what they believe. The rest? It’s really just a massively confused personality cult with a plethora of discernment bloggers adding to the confusion by dissecting all of the symptoms.

Get with the program: it’s either Tullian or something else.

paul