Calvin: Christians Must Keep Their Salvation by Pursuing Perpetual Forgiveness in the “Church”
“Why does American Protestantism have such weak sanctification? Calvin taught that the apostle Paul went from house to house preaching about the same gospel that saved us rather than teaching the full counsel of God, that’s why.”
I can see clearly now; it all finally makes sense. As a young Scriptural zealot, many things in the Protestant church confused me. I was the Baptist stripe of Protestant. And kudos to church historian John Immel, he is right; there is always a logic behind an action.
Why so much emphasis on the same gospel that saved us? Why were we constantly calling on people to be saved in the church? Why don’t we have any more answers to life’s difficult problems than the world? Why so much fuss over the buildings? Why is the Lord’s Table such an uppity pious affair when it seems to have been inaugurated during a casual dinner? Why have I always struggled to be wowed by that “ordinance.” Why all the crosses all over the place? On the church, in the church, around people’s necks. Geez. And why is the same bad behavior that is in the Catholic Church also in the Protestant church?
Fact is, American religion was founded on the Pilgrims who are not very often called what they really were: Calvinistic Puritans armed with the first Bible to ever arrive on American soil; The Geneva Bible which was John Calvin’s commentary on the Bible.
Talk abounds concerning the foremost figures of the Reformation, John Calvin and Martin Luther. Many opinions abound, but everybody agrees that they are the fathers of the Protestant Reformation and spiritual heroes. They are the George Washington and James Madison of our faith.
New Calvinism is a return to the purest form of the Reformation found in the John Calvin Institutes of the Christian Religion. And there is a reason New Calvinism is taking over Protestantism by storm: Protestantism originally came from Calvinism and is well primed to be retrofitted with the original. Forget doctrine, that’s the same thing as football fans talking about stats. It’s interesting, but it doesn’t matter, the game is played on the field. Calvinism is a tradition that has little to do with the election versus freewill issue as well, that’s just a family quarrel about which sibling gets to use the bathroom next. There are two kinds of Protestants in the world: staunch doctrinal Calvinists and those who function like Calvinists. Today, that translates into New Calvinists and everybody else that’s left. New Calvinists strive to continually define the logic that drives their actions; everyone else is just coasting on the basics, but are well primed to step over to the wild side.
Why is this? We find some answers in the Calvin Institutes; specifically, 4.1.21,22. Therein we read:
Wherefore, our initiation into the fellowship of the church is, by the symbol of ablution, to teach us that we have no admission into the family of God, unless by his goodness our impurities are previously washed away (20).
Nor by remission of sins does the Lord only once for all elect and admit us into the Church, but by the same means he preserves and defends us in it. For what would it avail us to receive a pardon of which we were afterwards to have no use? That the mercy of the Lord would be vain and delusive if only granted once, all the godly can bear witness; for there is none who is not conscious, during his whole life, of many infirmities which stand in need of divine mercy. And truly it is not without cause that the Lord promises this gift specially to his own household, nor in vain that he orders the same message of reconciliation to be daily delivered to them.
This is a startling statement for any Christian paying attention. But it is also a grand example of talking about stats; i.e., Christ died once, for all of our sins and that is imputed, in totality one time, at our conversion for all past and future sins, versus how Protestants really function: a weekly focus on the gospel. Why? That’s how we keep our salvation, that’s why. New Calvinists say, “amen.” Baptists protest, but that’s how they function. I have watched it for 30+ years.
Calvin continues:
On the other hand, the Lord has called his people to eternal salvation, and therefore they ought to consider that pardon for their sins is always ready. Hence let us surely hold that if we are admitted and ingrafted into the body of the Church, the forgiveness of sins has been bestowed, and is daily bestowed on us, in divine liberality, through the intervention of Christ’s merits, and the sanctification of the Spirit.
22. To impart this blessing to us, the keys have been given to the Church (Mt. 16:19; 18:18). For when Christ gave the command to the apostles, and conferred the power of forgiving sins, he not merely intended that they should loose the sins of those who should be converted from impiety to the faith of Christ; but, moreover, that they should perpetually perform this office among believers. This Paul teaches, when he says that the embassy of reconciliation has been committed to the ministers of the Church, that they may ever and anon in the name of Christ exhort the people to be reconciled to God (2 Cor. 5:20). Therefore, in the communion of saints our sins are constantly forgiven by the ministry of the Church, when presbyters or bishops, to whom the office has been committed, confirm pious consciences, in the hope of pardon and forgiveness by the promises of the gospel, and that as well in public as in private, as the case requires. For there are many who, from their infirmity, stand in need of special pacification, and Paul declares that he testified of the grace of Christ not only in the public assembly, but from house to house, reminding each individually of the doctrine of salvation (Acts 20:20, 21). Three things are here to be observed. First, Whatever be the holiness which the children of God possess, it is always under the condition, that so long as they dwell in a mortal body, they cannot stand before God without forgiveness of sins. Secondly, This benefit is so peculiar to the Church, that we cannot enjoy it unless we continue in the communion of the Church. Thirdly, It is dispensed to us by the ministers and pastors of the Church, either in the preaching of the Gospel or the administration of the Sacraments, and herein is especially manifested the power of the keys, which the Lord has bestowed on the company of the faithful. Accordingly, let each of us consider it to be his duty to seek forgiveness of sins only where the Lord has placed it. Of the public reconciliation which relates to discipline, we shall speak at the proper place.
Why so much emphasis on the same gospel that saved us? Because it keeps saving us. Why so much fuss about buildings? Those are the temples where we find our need for perpetual salvation and forgiveness for sins that would circumvent our justification. Why are pastors put on a pedestal and allowed to rape, pillage, and steal? In them we have our absolution. Why so much fuss about the Lord’s Table and quarreling over real wine or grape juice? There is additional salvation in the sacraments. Why all of the crosses? Same thing: more gospel; more salvation. Why do we sweep scandal under the rug? It is a threat to the institution, and that’s where we find our salvation. Why does American Protestantism have such weak sanctification? Calvin taught that the apostle Paul went from house to house preaching about the same gospel that saved us rather than teaching the full counsel of God, that’s why.
Calvin’s statement about being “engrafted” into the “church” is interesting. The Potter’s House has just adopted Remnant Theology as opposed to Covenant Theology, New Covenant Theology, or Dispensationism. Are we engrafted into a “church” or an “olive tree”? In Romans 9-11, what does that olive tree symbolize? Something to think about.
John Immel is right, action is always driven by logic. In our present day, doctrine is getting lip service while Calvin’s logic is driving the actions. That is why nothing going on in the church makes any sense right now.
And I doubt it ever will until God’s people come out from among them.
paul
Election, and the Arena Unlittered by Flesh and Blood
“Does the doctrine of election logically exclude the value of the non-elect?”
When it gets right down to it, ignorance built the people ovens at Auschwitz. Not the builders, they were by no means ignorant, but the ignorance of people in general supplied the mortar. The bloodthirsty are rarely ignorant of knowledge that matters, that’s how they control the ignorant masses. We would expect God to be the master of understatement for the purpose of making a point; hence, “My people die for lack of knowledge.” The Nazis knew exactly what they were doing, and the world finally responded because of the results. And so it goes; the eventual reactionary blitzkrieg by good men is bittersweet for Lady Wisdom. Many must die to make the point, and no consolation can be found in quick death, for the tyrant’s disdain for the victims will not tolerate such mercy.
Christians have always led the pack of ignorance that focuses on the what rather than the why. Our faith is a “license for irrationality” (John Immel: TANC 2012, session 1). Yes, knowledge is puffed up. Knowledge seeks to explain the God so high above us. We embrace the philosophy of our fathers whom we know not: “The truly wise man knows that he knows nothing” (Socrates). Ignorance is child-like faith. We believe that we can remain as harmless doves without the wisdom of serpents. We claim Jesus Christ while parroting Socrates in our ignorance. We worship at the altar of mindlessness while attributing all that we don’t understand to “God’s will.” Prayer is our exhibition of faith that proclaims our helplessness. Stupidity, prayer, and “God’s will” are our functional trinity. Knowledge that feeds our bank account and personal worth is within our domain—knowledge for life and death belongs to the gods. Therefore, our elderly fustigate the young for using bad grammar while wallowing in doctrinal ignorance.
So, week after week, we settle for the same old song and dance at church; literally, seven verses about Jesus repeated eleven times with drums, guitars, and violins. And what will we learn this week? What else? Something about Jesus. When He spoke of wisdom, He was merely speaking of Himself. This is how Churchianity is done; this is our doctrine: to teach ANYTHING ELSE but Jesus is to hinder the sanctification of the saints (John MacArthur Jr.). No, no, we don’t need to know the history and substance of philosophy; that would prevent us from quoting ancient philosophers and attributing their wisdom to Jesus (piously pronounced, “geeee-jussss”).
So this is the lightbulb moment: in the name of Jesus, we watch tyranny grow in our backyard. As it sprouts upward, we attribute its growth to God’s will and we pray about it. The American church has watched the TULIP named Neo-Calvinism grow for 43 years now, and we still attribute it to God’s will and we still pray about it.
I imagine sister Martha is pretty upset about being asked to leave after being a member here for seventy years. Certainly, she must have done more than just ask a few questions. Oh well, God’s will. I asked one of the elders about the situation and he replied, “Jesus.” And who can argue with that answer? We must remember to pray for her.
Dear, could you please pass the fish?
Two articles written by Kevin O’Brian reveal the jolt of reality that can result from a little bit of thinking. I don’t know anything about Kevin O’Brian, but I can tell you that you need to read these two articles: [1] and [2]. Does the doctrine of election logically exclude the value of the non-elect? And what does Nihilism have to do with today’s Churchianity? Is John Immel right? Can the rejection of certain ideologies prevent the tyranny that always follows? Can the arena of ideas prevent the festive arena of humans being devoured by wild beasts?
That question is answered by another must read article [3] by the 12 Tribes organization. I don’t know anything about them either, but I can tell you that you need to read this article also. These three articles together make a strong statement; a wakeup call to the importance of thinking in the arena unlittered with flesh and blood—the arena of knowledge, wisdom, and thinking.
Logic that always leads to tyranny and death must not be allowed to grow. It must be slain in the arena of ideas. And most of all, it must be kept from entering the house of God in the Trojan horse embodied by the minds of men.
paul
[1] http://www.thwordinc.blogspot.com/2013/01/just-kill-it.html
[2] http://thwordinc.blogspot.com/2013/06/calvinism-and-abortion.html
TANC 2013: John Immel; The History of Western Philosophy and Its Societal Impact on the Church
Video link for John Immel’s first session.
Tip: Open two tabs for this post; one for the video link and one for the illustrations. Click on “back” arrow to go back to list of illustrations from enlargement.
Click on Images to Enlarge….
John Immel session 2, part 1 video link.
John Immel session 2, part 2 video link.
John Immel session 2, part 3 video link.
John Immel session 2, part 4 video link.
John Immel session 3 video link.



























11 comments