Paul's Passing Thoughts

On the one hand being very busy right now, and on the other hand being sent article links of what’s trending and personal emails of interest, I have decided to write a post here that speaks to all subjects. Article one is this piece by Answers in Genesis aka Ken Ham. The next is this one promoting the idea that church membership is efficacious for salvation. The third is this one here which is indicative of massive concern of late among evangelicals that Marxism is taking over the church. And of course, everything President Trump that is constantly dominating the news feeds. And lastly, an email that I received this morning.

By the way, thanks to all for keeping me in the loop as I have a lot going on right now and little time to serf the net.

As predicted some time ago by this ministry, the church crazy train, by virtue of its gospel and history, will continue to race down the track at faster and faster speeds. For those left in the church still able to think for themselves, the time of decision is looking to be near. Will you capitulate to the authority of men, or be a Hebrews 11 believer? Will you have courage and believe that your true reward is in heaven, or will you continue to be a cowardly lazy servant who will return to the Lord only what was originally given when He returns? You know, the same gospel that saved you originally lest you have a “righteousness of your own.”

Don’t be like John MacArthur Jr. who was confronted with this decision in circa 2008. He had a choice: the Protestant gospel of progressive justification via a bunch of dead Gnostics, or the truth; he chose the former—too much to lose otherwise. Sadly, had he chosen the latter, I believe he could have changed church history. He screwed up big-time, and lost an opportunity to impact Christianity just short of the Apostles. He clearly chose the traditions of men instead of God’s truth. I believe the following; had he stood up and said, “Through the admonition of several notable church leaders responding to my book, ‘The Gospel According to Jesus,’ I now see clearly what the Reformers really believed, and though their persuasion is for the affirmative, I must reject it with prejudice. We have it wrong and must change how we see the truth and how we apply it.” I believe many, if not more than ever, would have followed his leading.

That which is presently trending would have been rejected out of hand by the vast majority of churchians 10 to 20 years ago. But again, when authority is truth, the latter takes a backseat to what the academics say. In other words, when it gets right down to it, anything the academics say goes, and this will continue at breakneck speed. And dear discernment bloggers, there is no saving the church; give it up. It was run of the mill tyranny in the beginning until tempered by the American Revolution, but will most certainly return to its basic roots which is what we are witnessing in our day. In regard to what we see trending today, where will it end up? Read the book of Revelation; it’s all there.

First, know this: you cannot separate politics from church because church has always been a political party. Remember this, the John Calvin Institutes of the Christian Religion is a political/philosophical document written to the King of France. Remember this, the Pilgrims, who were Puritans, who were Calvinists, came to this country as political refugees, not the boloney you hear about risking life and limb for religious freedom. The Puritan Calvinists thought they could do church-state better than the Church of England, so they set sail to where they could have the freedom to do church-state better, or so they thought. Your first clue should be that the American colonies were a full-blown theocracy modeled after Calvin’s Geneva fraught with a religious caste system not even rivaled by Hinduism. In fact, Puritan rule of the colonies was probably the match that set fire to the American Revolution.

Hence, Ken Ham, in his article, takes separation of church and state totally out of context. The true context follows: America was the first non-church-state government in the history of the world. That’s the context. Before America, religion and government always ruled over the great unwashed together. On the one hand, church leaders say they don’t want an American theocracy, but on the other hand they say, “God’s law is higher than man’s law.” Why did I pull my son out of “Christian” school? I didn’t want to pay for the Bible classes that are predicated on progressive justification and the false gospel of justification by faith. I didn’t tell the counselor that, but said, “We teach our boys the Bible at home.” The counselor’s response? “These classes are mandatory because the average Christian is not qualified to teach the Bible at home.” At that point, the meeting was over and I told her why.

Article 2 is merely good ole fashioned Protestant orthodoxy, viz, salvation is progressive through submission to church authority. In the article, the author uses Bible terms that refer to Christians as, a family, a body, a priesthood, ect. to make his point, but the church is an institution and is none of those things, especially a family. Like any other institution, when you are there you are called family, but that’s as far as it goes. And an institution is not a body nor does it operate like one. He refers to meeting together for “accountability” and cites the go-to verse for that in Hebrews, but that verse says nothing about “accountability” but only “encouraging each other unto good works” which the church denies we can do to begin with. And of course, our intelligence is completely offended by the “there is no perfect church” mantra. Hello, NO church has ever separated itself from ANY denomination, or even withheld funds in the face of cover-ups for kidnapping, child rape, murder, embezzlement, and obstruction of justice. If you go to church, you are putting your children at risk with no legal recourse. No perfect church indeed. In truth, going to church denies the new birth which speaks to, at least,  individual ability through new creaturehood.

Thirdly, the church’s Total Inability of Man doctrine necessarily requires a Marxist political solution. When Americanism broke up the marriage between church and state, Communism filled the void. The introduction of Communism in the historical timeline is no accident or mere happenstance. Total Inability is a core ideology of the church and Communism and a strong primer for the two to be intimate. Hence, while Susan was surprised to hear about professors at Cedarville University voting for Obama at a dinner party we went to, I really wasn’t surprised at all. While there may be many disagreements between church and Communism, the core value is belief in man’s total inability.

Fourth, this is why the entire political apparatus is against Trump who is a populous movement in and of himself. He believes in the ability of the individual. He wants to empower dumb hicks who like to hunt and drink beer. This is not going over well. Why, in the face of proven history, are Democrats against tax cuts? It makes no sense, right? But remember, money empowers people. That’s what it is all about. In everything, follow the money, but also follow the presuppositions concerning mankind. In both cases, government and religion are always in bed together.

Lastly, a trend I have seen for a long time, but never commented on, and was brought to my attention once again in an email I received this morning. While parishioners are proud to be under the authority of “godly men,” and not Christ, it’s funny how they think they have authority over the unchurched because they are higher in the caste system among the great unwashed. A friend of mine shared, in the email, how she was lectured and demeaned for not being a churchian.  When churchians  comment here at PPT, they don’t offer a counter-argument based on the points made in any given article, but merely argue from a position of authority. In other words, because they go to church and you don’t, their opinion supposedly has authority over your conscience. So, you could also say that this is an argument between those who have clearly relegated their conscience to the authority of men versus those who have kept their own conscience and insist on being persuaded with the truth.

This is all coming to a head more and more, and decision time for many. My advice is to cut your loses and return to a true Christian fellowship that is the true family of God and functions like a real body.

paul

via Kevin DeYoung: Assurance Comes from Elders Proclaiming You Saved; 12 minutes

via A Reformed Myth: Calvinists Believe in Election

Note: Construction on the new building begins May 5th, yet the majority of monetary gifts designated for the victims have not been released because “it’s a complicated process.” Building a 3 million dollar building is not complicated? Moreover, though there are additional funds not accounted for from miscellaneous funds, the total of giving thus far for victims and infrastructure only totals about 3 million…yet, construction begins on may 5th? Stay tuned, how this ends will be interesting. 

In case you haven’t noticed, there is a second historical revolution going on. After thousands of years of misery, mankind finally said no to Plato’s Republic and the American Revolution ensued. However, a large degree of caste still remains; while people are more free legally than they have ever been, manipulative tyranny still exists through the belief of expertism over individual ability.

Let’s not confuse the issue with branding; church is church. Whatever the stripe, it’s a caste system. Whatever the stripe, it’s where people go to get their spiritual needs met by others who are supposedly more qualified to do so. And, what church does not claim authority from God? Supposedly, submission to authority prevents chaos that flows out of individualism, but who can deny the chaos produced by authority? Historically, what country has shown more stability than America? The first government by the people and for the people.

Over and over and over again in history people trust governing authorities until the misery becomes too much. In the same way the masses finally said “no” during the American Revolution, they are now saying no to the elitist class of cultural mind-controllers. Families get things done efficiently without expert regulators who supposedly prevent chaos eruptions from the serfs.

Yes, church authorities, those of “church government,” the purveyors of “church polity,” have been the trusted experts for thousands of years and now we must ask, “Is there a bigger train wreck than church culture?” Hardly.

Let me borrow a cliché as we continue. In the same way case-hardened detectives can be shocked by a particular case, even I, a case-hardened church-detective who has investigated the church culture morass for ten years, am stunned by the recent unfolding drama surrounding the Sutherland Springs church massacre.

As an aside before we move on, the subject of this post is in addition to very strange circumstances surrounding the shooter, the church, what was going on the day of the shooting, and its families prior to the shooting. Lots of unanswered questions that will probably remain unanswered.

As expected, though deemed totally depraved by churches everywhere, monetary donations by individuals have poured in to help the victims and the church. But since “like sheep we have all gone astray,” the church experts must oversee the management of the money lest things not be done, “decently and in order.” The results? Utter chaos, mistrust, the appearance of evil, and generally speaking, disaster.

How bad is it? Where to begin? This post will only hit the infamous high points. First, money was donated to replace the original church building which I understand.  A different scenery that will temper the horrific memories is a valid use of money. But, have you seen the plans for the new building? Uh, perplexing to say the least from a commonsense perspective. This is the old building…

This is the proposed (and approved) new building…

Say what? Why is a 1 million dollar plus upgrade necessary just because you have the money? Why not spend half that, still have one heck of an impressive building for that size congregation, and invest the rest of the money in people?

Answer: what is a better example of church focus being on infrastructure and the way such infrastructure represents authority and elitism? Families are about nurturing and building people; church is about using people to build the clout and authority of the institution. To me, this absolutely says it all.

Next, we may thank Lauren McGaughy, Texas Government Reporter, for this piece which lays out the sordid affair in a thorough, well-organized  fashion. I only wish we could give her thanks under better circumstances.

So, for some reason, the church was given control over all benefit funds, many of which were designated for specific victims or all victims as a group. One or two funds were designated for the church infrastructure. The church was even given control over…”More than $1.4 million was raised through the website GoFundMe.com for specific families.” And of course, a “Restoration Committee” was formed to oversee the disbursement of funds, complete, I might add, and of course, with all kinds of regulations attached. Let’s be clear here; money designated for victims was regulated by the church, and according to hypothetical situations where the church would stand in judgment over the supposed misuse of the money. That’s because in Protestantism, EVERYTHING is about sin. No parishioner can do anything without the church “leadership” first partaking in sin-sweeping the area. And that includes the practice of one’s own gift granted by the Spirit. We can’t have people running around willy-nilly practicing their gifts without permission from the church philosopher kings.

Keep in mind, these are all church members who suffered unimaginable terror due to, in my estimation, the leadership of the church being asleep at the switch, and one hypothetical stated that would circumvent disbursement was, “to relieve the consequences of sin, such as bail bonds, drug/alcohol issues.” But all in all, I want to emphasize that, according to the aforementioned article, “First Baptist is paying specific victims’ expenses with proof of need, like copies of bills and prescriptions..” Proof of need? The money was given to THEM based on public knowledge of what happened and how much was being collected progressively which is also public knowledge. Also, the church is not releasing the funds without a confidentiality agreement. Huh? Why not? Folks, this is barely less than extortion under the most grievous of circumstances.

Let’s say one of the victims received more money than needed for specific needs arising out of the tragedy, like medical bills, but decided to use the money to take some new direction in their life that would temper the horrific circumstances they experienced? Maybe the experience would inspire one to go to nursing school or something like that, and normally they would not have the money. Who is the church to judge over that? IT’S NOT THEIR MONEY!!! In fact, one victim who was on the verge of retiring lost her daughter in the shooting and is now raising her daughter’s children. In such a case, any money gifted to her should be released immediately with no questions asked. Instead, she is limited to a certain amount of requests per year (per year?), and must show proof of need. She made this comment accordingly:

“My grandson fell down the stairs the other day. I had to take him to the emergency room to make sure that the plate in his leg hadn’t been jostled and moved. Am I supposed to go to the church for $20 for gas and wait two weeks?” she asked. “And I’m sure as heck not going to give them my account numbers.”

And then there is this:

McNulty also claims the church has received donations for specific families, including hers, that have not been handed over. The News reviewed copies of the alleged checks, which were paid to the church with “to the family of Tara McNulty” in the memo line.

Kati Wall, a local teacher who lost her parents in the shooting, said the church helped her cover the salary she lost while she was off work. But it took months to reach the church, she said, and once she did, she had to prove she couldn’t get the money elsewhere before it would help.

Let’s talk about how family handles these things. When the 1st century assembly of Christ were apprised of a need, letters were sent, messengers picked up the collection and delivered it…end of conversation. Involving the church in this matter as an institution has also led to complicating government regulation, or at least perceived regulation, according to the “Restoration Committee” if its not merely an excuse.

Oh, lest I get distracted by the sheer chaotic absurdity of it all, I need to simply mention that by and large the families are not receiving the funds:

“This has gotten way out of hand — way out of hand,” said Lisa McNulty, 54, who lost her daughter in the shooting and says she never received donations the church received for her family. “There’s some greed going on, and it’s wrong.”

And here is the rub: I mentioned that a 1 million dollar building was over the top for the size of the congregation and what they were accustomed to in the past. With that said, I will also tell you, that is what has been collected thus far for the building, but the actual approved plans call for a 3 million dollar structure. That is equal to total funds collected overall leading some to wonder if that’s what all of the foot-dragging is about regarding the disbursement of funds. That would be the ultimate statement concerning where priorities are with the institutional church: with the institution and not people. The pastor himself stated that the new building will “represent new life. This is going to represent new growth,” How can a building represent anything about spiritual growth? And what was the excuse for the delay of funds from the committee’s head?

Dziuk defended the church’s rules, including requirements that victims exhaust other funding means first. He said they “probably” could have distributed the money faster, “but this isn’t the only thing we’re doing. We’re in the process of building a new church. “There’s just a lot going on.”

Again, clearly, the building project is a higher priority than the needs. And how bad does all of this smell? Two donors who account for about 1/3 of the money raised, plus the nonprofit fundraiser for the building project have cut ties with the church. Another person who raised about 100,000 dollars is considering asking for the money back. Yet another fundraiser was asked to start another fund for, get this, “victims who fell between the cracks.” Say what? After more than 3 million dollars is raised, more is needed because some victims were overlooked? Are you kidding me? Anyway, the fundraiser refused and has also cut ties with the church.

But it doesn’t stop there lest the church would only exhibit mere intemperance spoken of in the secular realm.

Facebook has become the center of the fight, with words like “cult” and “greed” bandied about by those questioning the church’s silence, “lynch mob” and “witch hunt” to refer to those asking questions. One particularly active group was archived due to “threatening messages,” its moderator told The News.

Of course, no such scandal took place in the disbursement of funds to the Las Vegas shooting victims who were paid lump sums. Was that somehow less complicated?

But no worries, the victims will prevail one way or the other because GoFundMe is involved and the bottom line follows: the church can’t implement restrictions on funds designated for specific victims with no strings attached. That is, unless the victims foolishly signed some sort of agreement with the church allowing them to have full authority over the money.

When is enough going to be enough? Is there a better way? Well, when the people were disgruntled about the disbursement of support to the Greek widows (book of Acts), or the lack thereof and complained to the Apostles, what did they do? They told the people to deal with it. Likewise, the Sutherland Springs victims themselves would have been told to oversee the disbursement. Why not? In contemporary terms, each victim would have been told to seek their own representation. In Acts, the people were told to pick seven men from among them to oversee the care of widows and to represent the people as a whole.

My point is this: it was a body/group effort and not overseen by those concerned with having authority over the situation. The money belonged to the Greek widows, not the Apostles. But we must remember that Protestant orthodoxy calls for the church to have all authority over its members, and for that matter, everything the Lord owns as well, which is everything. So, this behavior shouldn’t surprise us that much.

And given the Protestant false gospel of justification by faith that denies the new birth, we expect church authorities to have no confidence in individuals to use gifted money for their own needs or any other private life matter.

I see a different vision. I see a network of 100 home fellowships taking up a collection for a need, and mailing a check directly to the one or ones needing it…end of story. It IS that simple, and anything less is an excuse for some sort of evil intent.

paul

Addendum: No church victim story would be complete without examples of church authoritarians demeaning the victims as uneducated petty children. According to the head over the “Restoration Committee”:

“There are going to be some people who are not going to be satisfied no matter what,” Pat Dziuk, head of the church’s Restoration Committee, said in an interview with The Dallas Morning News. “God bless them. I know they’re hurting and I’m sorry, but we’re not going to make everyone happy.”