Paul's Passing Thoughts

Why Ligon Duncan is a Heretic in 8 Minutes

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on April 1, 2014

Calvinism’s Denial and Redefinition of the New Birth

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on January 19, 2014

More on why New Calvinism Has Massive Appeal

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on July 25, 2013

ppt-jpeg4“So what is the appeal of New Calvinism? Basically, five things….”

Mass appeal, rarely commendable in the Bible, is an earmark of New Calvinism. But why? As cited in another post, this quote from a New Calvinist organization reveals one primary reason:

What, then, is the subjective power of this message? Firstly, we find that there is real, objective freedom, the kind that, yes, can be experienced subjectively. We are freed from having to worry about the legitimacy of experiences; our claims of self-improvement are no longer seen as a basis of our witness or faith. In other words, we are freed from ourselves, from the tumultuous ebb and flow of our inner lives and the outward circumstances; anyone in Christ will be saved despite those things. We can observe our own turmoil without identifying with it. We might even find that we have compassion for others who function similarly. These fluctuations, violent as they might be, do not ultimately define us. If anything, they tell us about our need for a savior (David Zahl and Jacob Smith: Mockingbird blog).

This enables New Calvinists to boast an objective, factual gospel, while claiming that the objective gospel functions subjectively. In other words, the gospel (Christ and His works) is factual, but obtaining a deeper and deeper knowledge of those facts imputes those objective facts to our lives subjectively. This enables us to live our Christian lives by faith alone, while leaving the subjective results to God. Our primary goal is to contemplate the two things that saved us (the gospel): God’s holiness and our sinfulness (faith and repentance), and then as we go about living our lives, we don’t have to take anything that happens too seriously because it is all preordained by God.

Tragedy is a good thing because it testifies to our need for Christ; good works give us joy as we “experience” them, but we really don’t know whether they are in “our own efforts” or conducted by God. It’s subjective. According to Martin Luther, if we believe that we did the good work, that’s works salvation. If we attend our good works (as Christians) with fear that it could be us who did it and not God, that’s venial sin and not mortal sin. Hence, part of the New Calvinist daily repentance regiment is asking forgiveness for good works that we have done just in case it was us who did them. All in all, it insulates from responsibility for sin, and enables us to detach ourselves from negative emotions. Joy is a result of God’s goodness and good works. Tragedy reminds us of what we deserve and what God has saved us from—it’s just more good news!

Further appeal can be seen in a recent post by Dr. Ed Welch of CCEF. He starts off with the usual metaphysical curve-ball that seems to come in straight with the idea that our faith is objective truth. Then when he gets us swinging at that pitch, it curves with….

Faith is a way of seeing

Scripture is also fond of describing faith as the way to see God’s realities. ( By: Ed Welch Topics: Faith Published: July 17, 2013  http://www.ccef.org/blog/what-faith).

Welch continues to expound on how the subjective facts of the gospel leads to subjective “reality”:

With the naked eye we can see the physical world, but faith—which comes by hearing the word of God—allows us to “see” the Creator of the physical world (Heb. 11:3).  Faith allows us to see that Jesus is the Word, the Son of God, the Rescuer of the world.

With a twisting of 2Corinthians 4:18, Welch, like all New Calvinists, attempts to make the case that the physical world isn’t what really needs to be “seen” because the physical can be seen and therefore is not of faith. Hence, the Bible is to be used to see the Savior only, leading to a faith that enables us to see beyond the physical. In other words, borrowing his terminology, the Bible enables us to “see” beyond creation to the Creator Himself. Of course, this is merely hanging Bible verses on Plato’s Theory of Forms.

Welch then explains, in the same post, a technique that can be added to Bible induced gospel contemplationism:

One way to use this perspective on faith is to pray with another, “Lord, open our eyes. Help us to see what is really happening.” And then ask at the end of your time together, “What did we see?”

Here at the Potter’s House, what we study, what we read, is what you get. To the contrary, in this technique also promoted by John Piper and many other New Calvinists, the Bible speaks to you, presumably through the Spirit, subjectively, following a gospel-centered contemplation of the Scriptures. The plain sense of Scripture can now be traded for subjective experience. Apparently emboldened by the mindlessness of American Christians, Welch further explains this approach with the following:

Another way to use this is to encourage others to live with their eyes closed. Let me explain. The world that is available to our physical senses can dominate our spiritual sight. Physical trials, fiscal uncertainty, the safety of those we love, the intrusion of hard pasts—this whirlwind can blind us to the spiritual realities that are deeper and longer lasting. So in a sense, we need to close our eyes to the circumstances of life, so we can open them to hope. It might happen like this:

“What do you see?” ‘I see the rejection of my spouse.’ “Close your eyes, and keep looking. Look around with eyes of faith. Now what do you see?” ‘I see the rejection of my spouse.’ “Okay, keep your eyes closed and look at the world through the lenses of Ephesians 1, now what do you see?” ‘I see . . . nothing.’ “No problem, we just need help. Let’s pray, which, in itself, is an expression of how we see by faith.”

The important point is that you are closing your eyes—not as a form of denial—but as a way to see more.

Welch then completely mocks discernment by suggesting that people are saved by reading Christian mystics like CS Lewis:

Back to the story, my friend became cynical toward his friend’s beliefs, but he was still a seeker. Soon after he graduated from high school, a co-worker gave him Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis. On the very first page he began to “see.” After taking the next eight hours to read through the book, he knew he wanted to follow Jesus, though he didn’t know what that meant, and he did not know one other Christian he could ask.

So what is the appeal of New Calvinism? Basically, five things:

1. It enables people to deflect the negative emotions of life and trade them for joy by disconnecting from the physical world. This idea is sanctified by eradicating all value of earthly things (and people) for Christ.

2. It gives a simplistic answer for everything. All events in life are to either glorify God or show us our worthlessness.

3. Escape from responsibility and accountability. “I sinned? Well duh, that’s what sinners do.”

4. We already know what every verse in the Scripture is about, and by meditating on that, we can have a subjective result of our own choosing.

5. It eliminates the hard work of studying and wrestling with truth. Every verse is about Jesus, and the results are automatic. Also, hard work in spiritual matters is works salvation. As Calvin and Luther believed, sanctification is represented by the Sabbath rest. If you work, you die; hence, no work is more good news!

6. The Reformed, “power of the keys.” This is the idea that whatever Reformed elders bind on earth will be bound in heaven whether right or wrong.  Hence, by merely staying in the good graces of your local neighborhood elders, you’re guaranteed to be in the graces of God. You’re in because the elders say you’re in.

http://apprising.org/2012/01/06/beth-moore-and-john-piper-lead-lectio-divina-lite-at-passion-2012/

Where’s CJ? Is T4G in a Steubenville State of Mind?

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on July 8, 2013

Two high school football players in Steubenville, Ohio were convicted of raping a sixteen year old at a party. The case received national attention and invoked comments from the most famous among us in the sports world. This article gives ground level insight into the case and some of its unsung heroes. It will also gag you as much as the amended lawsuit against SGM did.

But it’s not over yet:

COLUMBUS —

An eastern Ohio grand jury is ready to renew its investigation into whether other laws were broken in the rape of a 16-year-old girl.

One of the key issues before the panel set to meet Monday in Steubenville is whether adults who are required to report crimes knew early on of the rape last August but didn’t say anything.

The panel last met May 24, then adjourned to give investigators overseen by Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine time to gather more evidence.

A judge in March convicted two high school football players of raping the West Virginia girl after an alcohol-fueled party last summer.

Read more: http://www.cantonrep.com/newsnow/x997478630/Grand-jury-to-reconvene-in-Steubenville-rape-case#ixzz2YTHYgw45

At the next Together for the Gospel conference (T4G: 4/8/2014), one of the original core four, CJ Mahaney, for the first time, will not be speaking. He is one of the primary defendants in the SGM class action lawsuit. The 2014 website is scrubbed of anything CJ except a small red link that you would miss if you were not searching for it. Clicking on the link takes you to the following page:

July 1, 2013

After much prayer, reflection and counsel I have decided to withdraw from participation in the 2014 Together for the Gospel conference. My reason for doing so is simple: I love these men and this conference and I desire to do all I possibly can to serve the ongoing fruitfulness of T4G.

Unfortunately, the civil lawsuit filed against Sovereign Grace Ministries, two former SGM churches and pastors (including myself), continues to generate the type of attention that could subject my friends to unfair and unwarranted criticism. Though dismissed in May (and now on appeal), the lawsuit could prove a distraction from the purpose of this important conference. My withdrawal is not intended to communicate anything about the merits of the suit. My decision simply reflects the reality that my participation could create a hindrance to this conference and its distinct purpose of serving so many pastors. My strong desire is to make sure this doesn’t happen. I believe the most effective way I can serve my friends who have supported me, and continue to support me, is by not participating in the 2014 conference.

My enthusiasm for this conference is undiminished and I believe it will continue to be a powerful context for encouraging and equipping pastors in their efforts to serve their churches and proclaim the gospel. I am immensely grateful for the undeserved privilege to have been involved in previous conferences, and, most importantly, my ongoing friendship with these men I love and respect.

C.J. Mahaney

Sovereign Grace Church | Louisville, KY

Then if you go to CJ’s website at SGC, there is no mention of T4G or any references to the 2014 speakers at all. Other sources inform me that there are not ANY recent posts from Mahaney showing up at any of the usual haunts like the Gospel Coalition blog.

My, my, do you feel the same cold chill that I do? I am reminiscing of when my sports hero, Bo Jackson blew out his knee. Hero one day—gone the next. It was like he never existed! Seriously, where’s CJ? Even more shocking is the sudden 180 from the statement of support that the T4G crowd posted, what? Two or three weeks ago?

Is this a Steubenville thing? Fact is, knowing of a sex crime and not reporting it is a serious crime. If it has been established that CJ knew and didn’t report it, he could be in deep doo-doo.

This would explain the new normal that posits the idea that they never even knew C J Mahaney. It would seem that the T4G crowd has spent as much political capital  on CJ as they can. They also know that Christians have short memories. The goal seems to be to create as much space/time as they can between themselves and CJ before it’s too late.

And the effort seems mutual. Only time will tell if CJ is falling on his sword .

paul

Calvinist T4G Orthodoxy: Library Size Matters

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on July 6, 2013

What do you think of the T4G gang and their “Study Tour”? This is where the key speakers associated with T4G conferences past and present show off their vast libraries. I have posted the video links at the end of this article.

Think about what this is saying. It clearly emanates the idea that vast para-biblical knowledge is needed to understand God’s word. It is also saying that unless you have the money to purchase such a library, you aren’t qualified. These guys are to be revered, respected, and obeyed because they have the knowledge. It’s spiritual caste on steroids.

This is clearly a power play to control people through intimidation—if you’re not a thinker. Basically, if you have a Bible and the internet, your access to information and the efficiency thereof makes their libraries look like an outhouse. But again, the most egregious idea that stems from this is that the Bible doesn’t contain adequate information in and of itself for life and godliness. In order to really grasp the Bible, you need all of that information from guys who lived in medieval times and had the compassion of alligators.

Can you imagine the Apostles putting on such a display? What are these guys thinking? Do they really want a pastor from Harlem seeing this video? What should he make of it? Good grief! These videos speak for themselves as these men flaunt their resources before the world in arrogance that staggers the imagination.

Al Mohler: http://vimeo.com/groups/27420/videos/8693850

Ligon Duncan: http://vimeo.com/groups/27420/videos/9237570

Mark Dever (This video is particularly disturbing):

CJ Mahaney:

John I used to teach the truth MacArthur: