Paul's Passing Thoughts

Let’s Pretend: Cedarville University Cares About the Gospel

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on June 10, 2013

ppt-jpeg4“Did you know Christians still need to be saved? Well, bless your heart, it may be too late for you, but quickly enroll your children at Cedarville where they can be saved by Dr. White’s gospel.”

Nobody wants to discuss the gospel that has been running the show in the American church for several years. Launched by a Reformed think tank in 1970, it seized control of evangelicalism in the mid-1990s. Propagators continually put forth the idea that they are the new sheriffs in town and they need time to straighten things out, but the fact is that their gospel has been running the show for almost twenty years now. Are we better off? Hardly.

We aren’t talking about mere semantics here. We are talking about the heart of the gospel. We are talking about the law’s relationship to grace. We are talking about the very definition of justification. New Calvinism keeps the believer under law, but supposedly that’s ok because Jesus keeps it for us. No, under law is under law no matter who keeps it. God will not honor a false gospel. The New Calvinists aren’t fixing anything—they are creating the mess with their backdoor antinomianism.

The new President of Cedarville College is just what the trustees were looking for: handsome; educated; an adventurist; sports enthusiast; the appearance of pure orthodoxy; the Mayberry RFD family—all the things that bring in admissions from suburbia Christianity. Hope has returned to Cedarville; the alumni can once again look at themselves in the mirror. Yes, he’s good, even being a student of New Calvinism for six years now, it took me forty minutes to positively identify him as a New Calvinist heretic. I consider him one of the best at masking his false gospel.

Dr. Thomas White and his wife were both educated at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, a bastion of Christian mysticism and New Calvinism. But a statement on his blog says it all:

When the Gospel drives everything we do, we see all of us need grace every day. We all have deceitfully wicked hearts and preaching a moralistic set of rules will never save but will only add a burden that mankind cannot bear. We should teach about theological realities such as adoption, redemption, forgiveness, and grace. We should become protectors of widows and orphans and fathers to the fatherless.

We need to proclaim loudly the biblical message that children are a blessing from the Lord, that life begins at the moment of conception, that we must fear God more than any opinion of man, and that the Gospel brings grace if one repents and believes. No matter any judge’s verdict, we must defend life now, not wait until the morning after.

For the most part this reads well, but the devil is in the details. The greatest errors are always closest to the truth. Does the gospel drive EVERYTHING we do? Does the same gospel that saved us continue to completely drive our Christian life? You know, the “gospel-driven life.” The “gospel-centered life.” Do Christians continue to need grace every day? What does he mean by “grace”? The common grace we expect from God every day, or the same grace that saved us? Do Christians need daily salvific grace? Is that what he means? Sure it is, for he goes on to write,

We all have deceitfully wicked hearts….

Is that true? Do born-again Christians have “wicked hearts”?  Yes, according to New Calvinists. That’s why we need the gospel every day.

Like with all New Calvinists, we receive the same ambiguous rhetoric from White that masks his false gospel:

….preaching a moralistic set of rules will never save but will only add a burden that mankind cannot bear.

“Mankind” is thrown in to knock you off the scent. This kind of New Calvinist deception is protocol. The “preaching” refers back to “we” and “us” in the previous sentence including “all.” That would be us, as in CHRISTIANS, the fact that New Calvinists see us as no different than the unregenerate (and therefore still under the law) notwithstanding.

Furthermore, try not to close your eyes because a shocking scene is coming:

1. Rules in the Bible are called “moralistic.”

2. And, preaching rules will never “save” Christians.

Did you know Christians still need to be saved? Well, bless your heart, it may be too late for you, but quickly enroll your children at Cedarville where they can be saved by Dr. White’s gospel.

Somehow, they will become moral and serving as well. Dr. White will teach them two different things that supposedly yield godly results:

A. They are still totally depraved.

B. They should value life and help the poor.

Really?  Dr. White also states that we should….”teach about theological realities such as adoption, redemption, forgiveness, and grace.” “Obedience” and “sanctification” and “discipleship” are conspicuously missing. And there is a reason for that.

Like all New Calvinists, Dr. White will propagate a gospel contemplationism that supposedly results in the imputation of Christ’s obedience to the believer in sanctification. That’s because we are still under the law and Christ’s obedience must be imputed to our sanctification so that we can live our Christian life in the same way we were saved: by faith alone. Synergistic sanctification is believed to be works salvation. It’s antinomian let go and let God theology.

Again, these guys have been running the show for twenty years and the results speak for themselves. One result is the GARB response to the ABWE scandal. It’s sad but true: Christians continue to pay good money in the name of a gospel that will not sanctify, or save.

paul

Reference: http://www.jthomaswhite.com/2013/05/13/theological-truths-for-the-morning-after-the-ruling-by-korman/

WHITE 3WHITE 6

 

WHITE 8

 

WHITE 9

What Christ Would Say About, “Preaching the Gospel to Ourselves”

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on June 7, 2013

ppt-jpeg4The more I learn about Jesus Christ the more I stand in awe of Him. He was/is  for the little guy. He wants to be glorified in little people doing great things in His name. Hence, if one pays close attention, he taught His truth in a way that it could be understood by the least gifted. I am not saying that the Word is not deep at times, but I am saying that depth does not stand in the way of the knowledge we need for individual “life and godliness.”

Plato was different. He wasn’t like Jesus. Knowledge was the only way to understanding reality, so vast giftedness in regard to intellect was critical for the wellbeing of society. That gift was only found in a few who should rule the masses for the betterment of “the group” or “the whole.” Knowledge is it.

And that’s the American church. Obviously, in our mindset, a Ph.D. equals intellectual giftedness that must rule over others for the sake of “the group.” We have lots of them telling us that we need to “preach the gospel to ourselves every day.” John Piper and Al Mohler et al continually warn us not to think we can be saved by the gospel and then, “move on to something else.” The brilliant Dr. Horton tells us that we must continually visit the gospel “afresh” in order to live the Christian life. Supposedly, the spiritual peasantry should listen to them because they are the gifted ones appointed by God to, as Al Mohler put it, “save God’s people from ignorance.” Ahmen.

But what did Jesus say thou spiritual ditch digger? Well, He told us a story about a woman He met at a well:

John 4:7 – A woman from Samaria came to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give me a drink.” 8 (For his disciples had gone away into the city to buy food.) 9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “How is it that you, a Jew, ask for a drink from me, a woman of Samaria?” (For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.) 10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, ‘Give me a drink,’ you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.” 11 The woman said to him, “Sir, you have nothing to draw water with, and the well is deep. Where do you get that living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob? He gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did his sons and his livestock.” 13 Jesus said to her, “Everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again. The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” 15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water.”

Obviously, Christ was talking about the gospel, salvation, or whatever idiom you want to use. The one drink results in a continuous spring of living water with no need to drink of it again. Then why would we need to continually drink of the gospel “afresh” for our Christian life? Christ is clearly saying that one drink is enough and that particular thirst/need will never reoccur. “But Paul, He wasn’t speaking of the gospel per se.” Then what was He speaking of?

Bottom line: Jesus’ illustration completely refutes the idea that sanctification, or the Christian life, has a realized or unrealized thirst that needs to be satisfied by the gospel. We drink of the gospel once for salvation and have no need to drink again.

paul

Calvinists Say the Darndest Things

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on June 7, 2013

ppt-jpeg4“Calvin didn’t write that….I have read Calvin.”

Paul,

It seems you have finally stated our position accurately. I would go to the stake to defend the doctrine of “perpetual” justification. Perpetual means ” Neverceasing; continuing forever or for an unlimited time; unfailing; everlasting; continuous.”  Once God has declared believers to be righteous in his sight, we cannot and need not do anything to perpetuate that standing. “Through whom [Christ] we have an access into this grace in which we stand and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.” This bears no resemblance to “progressive justification.”

Paul: It’s perpetual only as long as one lives by faith alone in sanctification.

C: Your statement makes no sense whatsoever.

Paul: Why is that? What’s so hard about the concept of keeping yourself saved by not obeying the law in “your own efforts” in sanctification because a perfect obedience is needed to maintain justification. What is so hard for you to understand about that concept?

C: There is nothing difficult about it except that no one believes it. You are clearly confusing concepts and statements and putting them together in a statement that is sheer nonsense.

Paul: Calvin clearly taught that any Christian who believed that they can please God by keeping the law in sanctification are condemning themselves (CI 3.14.10). Calvin Also taught that sin in the Christian life “separates” us from the “grace” of God.” Got that? Sin in the Christian life SEPARATES us from God’s GRACE. And moreover, that forgiveness for the grace-separating sin has to be continually sought in the church “daily” in order to “keep us in the family of God” (Calvin’s Commentaries, Vol. 45: Catholic Epistles). Give it up dawg, the gigs up. Calvin was a stark raving heretic.

C: Calvin didn’t write that. He did not teach that sin in the believer’s life separates us from the grace of God. Give me the quote.  Even if he had taught that, it doesn’t mean Calvinists have followed him in that belief. Calvin believed many things that Calvinists don’t believe. If you want to discuss real quotations, I would be happy to do that. Don’t just try to tell me what Calvin wrote. I have read Calvin.

Paul:

John Calvin: Commentaries on the Catholic Epistles. The Calvin Translation Society 1855. Editor: John Owen, p. 165 ¶4

“Secondly, this passage shows that the gratuitous pardon of sins is given us not only once, but that it is a benefit perpetually residing in the Church, and daily offered to the faithful. For the Apostle here addresses the faithful; as doubtless no man has ever been, nor ever will be, who can otherwise please God, since all are guilty before him; for however strong a desire there may be in us of acting rightly, we always go haltingly to God. Yet what is half done obtains no approval with God. In the meantime, by new sins we continually separate ourselves, as far as we can, from the grace of God. Thus it is, that all the saints have need of the daily forgiveness of sins; for this alone keeps us in the family of God”

C: …. you need to remember that Calvinism did not come from Calvin. His body had long been decayed in the cold ground when the system we know as “Calvinism” was born. The Scriptures, not the Institutes, are our authority. I would not spend a second of my time defending Calvin or his writings. However, he was used of God to revive important truths that had lain buried for centuries. He was not inspired, but he was hardly a heretic.

Calvinism didn’t come from Calvin? Really? And sorry, this, “Calvin didn’t write that….I have read Calvin.” is more than one second.

paul

Tagged with: ,

The Real Meaning Behind “We Must Preach the Gospel to Ourselves Everyday”

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on June 6, 2013

ppt-jpeg4In his commentary on the Catholic Epistles, volume 45, Calvin states the following:

“Secondly, this passage shows that the gratuitous pardon of sins is given us not only once, but that it is a benefit perpetually residing in the Church, and daily offered to the faithful. For the Apostle here addresses the faithful; as doubtless no man has ever been, nor ever will be, who can otherwise please God, since all are guilty before him; for however strong a desire there may be in us of acting rightly, we always go haltingly to God. Yet what is half done obtains no approval with God. In the meantime, by new sins we continually separate ourselves, as far as we can, from the grace of God. Thus it is, that all the saints have need of the daily forgiveness of sins; for this alone keeps us in the family of God” (John Calvin: Commentaries on the Catholic Epistles. The Calvin Translation Society 1855. Editor: John Owen, p. 165 ¶4).

Calvin is clearly stating here that sin in sanctification separates us from grace:

by new sins we continually separate ourselves, as far as we can, from the grace of God.

Hence, there is no distinction between sonship and justification. Sin can only separate us from grace, and not intimacy with the Father. Sonship, which should be under the auspices of sanctification, is fused with justification. Then the shocker:

Thus it is, that all the saints have need of the daily forgiveness of sins; for this alone keeps us in the family of God.

Notice also that this “gratuitous pardon” is “offered” daily. So in the same way we are initially offered salvation for forgiveness of sins, we have to continually accept this daily offer of forgiveness. And moreover, that “keeps us” in the family of God. “We must preach the gospel to ourselves every day.” Sound familiar?

Now we know why.

paul

Press Release on 2013 TANC Conference

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on June 6, 2013

green-logo3Please help us! Distribute this press release/invitation to your pastor and fellow Christians. It can be attached to emails, printed as a flyer, or posted on a blog.

Here is the pdf file: 2013 TANC Conference Press Release 6.6.2013