Paul's Passing Thoughts

Please Support Our Evangelistic Outreach to Calvinists

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on October 19, 2013

CP2013

On December 27-30, we will attend the Cross Conference in Louisville, Kentucky and reach out to the Calvinists there with the true gospel of Jesus Christ. We will be supplying many materials to them for free depending on the support we receive for this missionary endeavor.

We will engage Calvinists there and plead with them to repent of salvation by Christ plus antinomianism. If Christ keeps the law for us in sanctification, that means we have to believe that to remain saved. We will also address the belief that Christians need to receive a perpetual and ongoing salvific forgiveness for sins committed in sanctification, and if that is not received by “preaching the gospel to ourselves” we will lose our salvation.

Please pray for us. We will find many who are not aware of what Calvin really believed. Inquiries for more information should be sent to mail@ttanc.com. Donations can be sent to PO Box 583, Xenia, Ohio 45385. For PayPal, use the same email address.

TANC

A non-profit LLC.

Tagged with: ,

MacArthur’s Strange Fire Conference: Sigh; Ok, Let’s Go Over This One More Time

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on October 19, 2013

ppt-jpeg4I have written two other articles on this year’s Strange Fire Conference hosted by the confused, possibly heretical John MacArthur. MacArthur and the shameless hacks he invited are staunch Calvinists. I have tried to state as simply as possible that Calvin et al taught a false gospel. Why? Because the essence of the false Reformed gospel is that you must live by faith alone in sanctification to keep your justification. It’s salvation by Christ plus antinomianism. And by the way, Antinomianism will be the one world religion of the last days headed by the “man of anomia.”

This is nothing new. James confronted the same thing in his letter to the Jewish church before the Gentiles were officially noted as equals in God’s kingdom. But yet, doctrine is not the crux of the issue here. The cessation of particular gifts issue is not the crux. And behavior is not the crux. Calvin did not go to the Bible and discover that he agreed with Augustine without presuppositions. Neither did Luther. Both approached the Bible with a Platonist worldview.

They simply made Christ the culmination of the true forms, and EVERYTHING else shadows of the true form, including the other two members of the Trinity. Hence, Christ must be seen in every reality of life, and all of life must be interpreted through Christ.

Granted, the way the Reformers dressed it all up in biblical garb is pure genius. Plato’s objective true forms descending into progressive subjectivity is now “the centrality of the objective gospel outside of us,” and “the subjective power of an objective gospel.” Google those terms at your own leisure. It is also comprised of the Platonist idea that matter is evil and spirit is good, so grace cannot be “infused.” This philosophy is the basis of total depravity. And by the way, if you know what to look for, these guys are not even ambiguous about it.

So let me state it again: MacArthur’s problem with the Charismatic movement is that it puts value on life in the here and now. Everything else is just window dressing. He tolerated CJ Mahaney for a time because Mahaney shares his disdain for human existence, MacArthur’s general confusion between his former grammatical interpretation of reality and his present Christocentric interpretation of reality notwithstanding.

This is why these guys brazenly brag about their endearment to the Puritans who despised those who “live in the shadows” of this forsaken world. This is why they boast of their endearment to those who hung Quakers and drowned women; they relate to the same Platonist disdain for putting stock in the ability of man to improve the conditions of this fallen world.

And like the Quakers, Charismatics believe in “infused grace.” MacArthur cannot have them hung, not yet anyway (perhaps his grandchildren will have the Puritan privilege), but the Strange Fire conference is the next best thing.

paul

Destroying Eve-il is a Reformed Family Tradition: Today Danvers, Tomorrow the Gallows

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on October 18, 2013

Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatarPaul's Passing Thoughts

Great pizza party last night with an author who is writing a sci-fi novel. As I sat and listened to him share his shocking  plot designed to invoke terror in his future readers, my recent research for “Reformation Myth” (due to be published in January 2013) made the chilling plot seem mundane in comparison to sexy witches being hung, burned, and impaled with images of Mary fitted with large spikes.

On the one hand, the Reformers were supposedly brilliant for recognizing Plato’s theory that pure truth and beauty is immutable, while on the other hand, their brutality was merely the “mentality of the age.” It is also understandable why Reformed folks are so big on, “all truth is God’s truth” because the Catholic church had a lot of ideas that the Reformers thought were pretty cool; specifically, that because of Eve, women in general are predisposed to evil, or Eveil.

View original post 2,417 more words

The Elephant’s Debt .com: MacDonald the Gambling Man; Post 20 of 20

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on October 18, 2013

An Answer for Lisa and Jane Doe

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on October 18, 2013

Ref. Church s5

Noah’s wife must have been an interesting person. Imagine being married to one of the few men on earth who is right. If Noah wasn’t a compromiser, and I tend to think he wasn’t, Noah’s wife would have lived in isolation for the most part. I was surprised to find a significant amount of data on her. Though it is debatable, some think her name was Emzara, but that assertion is mostly tradition. Her major role in Noah’s ministry was behind the scenes, and apparently, she never did anything to rock the boat. Pun intended.

I will admit it, I have the best commenters here at PPT available on the internet. They are not many, but they are thinkers. They also love the truth. Some, like Lisa, are searching. Not for A truth, but for THE truth. That’s important. Lisa is an anti-type of the kind of “Christianity” that the apostles predicted would be prevalent in the last days. Here is her comment:

Hi, Paul-

I have been reading through your posts for a few months. I am on a truth quest, and have been awakening over the course of the last 15 months to the amazing amount if deception in the American church. I must say I am greatly dismayed–it seems that any teacher of note is a fraud of some sort. We spent years in the SBC, then went looking for something “real.”

After escaping the mindless crush of Stepford Christianity (seeker driven/church growth), and awakening to the underlying dogma (courtesy of Peter Drucker), I began looking into the various reformed denoms. Early on, we discarded the YRR/ Driscoll crowd. After some investigation and disappointment, Piper was out. Then, I began to look at the differences between Calvinism and Lutheranism.

That is about where I came across your blog. You make very compelling arguments against Luther, Calvin, Protestantism as a whole, and virtually every remaining pastor I hoped had something helpful to teach. I am not saying I think you are wrong, but I have a pretty good idea of what you DON’T believe, but no clue what you DO believe. What is left? Help!

Thanks!

Lisa

While writing this post, I received an email that echo’s Lisa’s concerns as well. The writer’s identity is protected by referring to her as “Jane Doe.”

Hi, I came across your blog while doing my own research on James MacDonald and his controversies.  I have read through many of your past blogs and comments, in particular those relating to Calvinism.

Honestly, my head is spinning and my heart aching because I don’t know whether I am an even bigger fool than I thought for falling for MacDonald’s dog n pony show, or am I heading down another path of false teaching/opinions.

When I read your blog and others’ with your same opinions I realize that basically everything I listen to on Moody radio is essentially a farce.  YIKES!..  I really thought I was headed down the right path but now I think I might be a Calvinist and I am alarmed by this.

I’m just a mom, raised in the [omitted] tradition. I attended a [omitted] university and over the last 20 years found myself clinging to Moody radio and my local congregation. I’m questioning Moody and am wary of most churches because they all seem to tout McArthur, Piper, Francis Chan, Rick Warren, Platt and guys lined up with JM.

I’m afraid I researched myself out of any affiliation with anyone.  All I can hope for is to read my Bible with fresh eyes.

Sorry, you take the brunt of my sadness.

Jane Doe

Everybody just stop right now. Jane and Lisa are asking the same thing: “Where is THE truth???”  When the truth is hard to find for truth-lovers, that’s a bad life. But Jane and Lisa are in a good place filled with hope. Jane and Lisa are experiencing what the apostles said would be taking place in the “latter part of the latter days.” This is twofold. First, “Christians” will be looking for A truth rather than THE truth:

2Timithy 4:3 – For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, 4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

Secondly, sound doctrine will not be tolerated.

Is this not descriptive of the day we are in?

As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.

This is in a manner of speaking, it won’t be technically as bad (the gates of hell will not prevail against the church), but why do thousands upon thousands of “Christians” pay 100-400 dollars each plus travel expenses to hear from mere men with a bunch of Plato Academy titles after their names? It’s insane. These men will not give an account for our lives before Christ, and Lisa-n-Jane know it. They are taking responsibility for the sum and substance of their own lives before God—the lives that bear their names. Good for them.

Salvation is NOT found in Augustine’s institutional church; Jane and Lisa know that also.

Now, we first address Lisa’s question:

…but I have a pretty good idea of what you DON’T believe, but no clue what you DO believe. What is left? Help!

What we do believe can be found here, here, here, here, and here. TANC is a research institute that is also offering alternatives to the false Protestant church. Like Lisa, we are on a “truth quest” as well. Welcome to the quest Lisa. Christ said that those who seek truth will find it. The quest’s end is assured. TANC is far from claiming to have all of the answers, but we are developing frameworks to help the priesthood of believers in their exodus away from the Augustinian church herehere. and here.

The alternative is the unpublicized massive home fellowship movement afoot in this country. Christians are figuring out that the authority of the church is found in the Scriptures, not an institution created by Platonists. TANC is trying to set the example with The Potter’s House Home Fellowship movement. This is not difficult. We meet every Sunday night at 6pm for a fellowship meal. At 7pm, we have a Bible lesson till 8pm, and then more fellowship.

“But where in the world would we start if we decided to do that?” Well, can you cook and talk? That takes care of the fellowship part. As far as the Bible study part, we have several key studies to help people get started. Our study through the book of Romans is very foundational in regard to a framework to start with. Some people merely print copies of our Romans series, read them, and have a group discussion. This is not a difficult start. Let the authority of God’s word guide you from there.

Have you been duped? I will only speak for my wife Susan and myself. Susan and I have 80 years of Christian experience between us, and we have learned more in the past year than we have in all of our Christian lives. Were we formally duped by the traditions of men?

Yes. Big time.

paul