Paul's Passing Thoughts

Share the Love

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 30, 2013

The Book Thief, Seven Elements of the Complete Person, and Choosing a Church

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 30, 2013

ppt-jpeg4Susan and I saw The Book Thief  last night. It was certainly one of the most thought provoking movies I have ever seen. For those who embrace life through words, the movie will be entrancing. It is a two hour journey into what really matters, so leaving the movie and perusing the other marques on the way out of the theater was a different trip from the sublime to the profane. But in many ways, other movies people find entertaining are indicative of a thoughtless existence that ends up being the same narrative of The Book Thief; people suffering under the tyranny made possible by our own ignorance and frivolous approaches to life. Lack of pondering is where life is most dangerous.

After many hours of pondering the movie, and borrowing from subjects that are important to me, my mind has summarized some conclusions. I conclude that a complete person is one who understands what is important in life, and is on a journey of implementing those principles. Since I am free to share them, I will do so.

A complete person is free.

This is the freedom to pursue happiness and the satisfaction of maximizing the gift of potential. It is the freedom to be responsible for “the sum and substance of your own life.”*

A complete person is reconciled to God.

A complete person is at peace with God according to wisdom. They know how to control their own bodies, and are not enslaved to passions that wrong others. This is made possible by God’s forgiveness of our sins, and a new life in Jesus Christ. You may think it strange that this is not listed first, but man must know he is free and capable in seeking God himself, and that there is only ONE mediator between God and man—Jesus Christ.

A complete person recognizes equality.

A complete person recognizes that people are different, but are equal in regard to the importance of what they contribute to humanity. Therefore, justice is indeed blind and concerned with fairness. Justice takes vengeance on those who do not treat others the way they would want to be treated.

A complete person is courageous.

A complete person knows the seasons of life. They embrace those seasons with their emotions and seek no escape. When times are good, they rejoice. When times are bad, they consider, and they always seek the goodness that is always present in the land.

A complete person is a learner.

A complete person is always seeking wisdom, and is leery of the frivolous.

A complete person is hopeful.

A complete person knows the end of man’s story and rejoices in hope while hiding himself from trouble. But ultimately, when life corners him, he will mock its tragedy.

A complete person believes in the right republic.

A complete person recognizes that government’s purpose is to aid mankind in the other six pursuits. A proper government recognizes that strong individuals make a strong group.

Contrary to that, the wrong government deems man as incompetent to be free, and concludes that the freedom of man will lead to chaos. A contrary government will claim to be a mediator between you and God. A contrary government doesn’t believe men are created equal. A contrary government believes that learning and ideas are dangerous—those two tempt man to be free. A contrary government teaches that man’s only hope is in government. A contrary government believes man is weak, and what little bit he has to offer must be contributed to the group. If he cannot meet the government standard of worthy contribution, he should gladly give his life.

These elements are also useful in choosing a church. Are your ideas a threat? Do they teach that they are needed for you to be reconciled to God? Do they believe leadership has a special anointing that others do not have? Do they offer an escape from the rigors of embracing the emotions of horizontal life? Do they discourage or stay aloof from the idea of independent learning? Do they devalue definitive knowledge of the future? Do they emphasize the weakness of the individual and the strength of the institution? Do they offer an escape from being responsible for the “sum and substance of the life that bears your name”?*

We must remember: bondage started with a tyrant convincing Adam and Eve that they needed a mediator between them and God, and this tyranny trickles down into every aspect of humanity.

paul

*Church historian John Immel.

Rampant New Calvinist Plagiarism, and the Real Reason Mark Driscoll is Upset with Janet Mefferd. Also, New Calvinists are Guilty of Double Plagiarism.

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 29, 2013

ppt-jpeg4“A Calvinist believing in intellectual property is an oxymoron… that’s why plagiarism is rampant in the New Calvinist movement.”   

The radio host Janet Mefferd confronted the New Calvinist Mark Driscoll on air regarding plagiarism in his latest book. I listened to the interview and was struck by the overall lack of education concerning this movement that presently owns American Christianity.

During the interview, Driscoll, like many, many New Calvinists, continued to promote the idea that New Calvinism is still an upstart movement representing the only pure remnant of American Christianity. That’s absurd. New Calvinism has completely owned American evangelicalism since 1999. The movement is about 43 years old, and it took them about 25 years to reach this point. The present-day tyranny in the church that New Calvinism is responsible for kicked in around 2000. This provoked the mass of discernment blogs that we see today.

Another thing that came up, and Driscoll played along with, was Mefferd’s idea of “intellectual property.” That is an Enlightenment era idea and absolutely despised by New Calvinists. Be sure of this: when Mefferd said that, it totally torqued Driscoll off. Here is what folks continue to miss historically: New Calvinism is a return to authentic European Reformed theology. This is the same theology that the Pilgrims brought with them from Europe.

So, originally, America was a European church state and the only thing that saved America from that was the American Revolution which was inspired by Enlightenment thinking. Furthermore, the Great Awakening during that time was expressed in churches, that’s true, but the fundamental inspiration for the Great Awakening was the Enlightenment idea that ALL men are created equal and free. This also inspired the Abolitionist movement.

Hence, the idea that any average Joe can have relevant ideas, and those ideas should be their intellectual property, is an Enlightenment idea, and the Enlightenment era has always been the archenemy of Calvinism. A Calvinist believing in intellectual property is an oxymoron. Calvinists having to play along with the idea of intellectual property is a classic cultural clash between Puritan tyranny and the Enlightenment gospel that inspired the American idea. Calvinists don’t take intellectual property seriously and that’s why plagiarism is rampant in the New Calvinist movement. If Driscoll was honest, he would have laughed in Mefferd’s face. Only the enlightened have relevant intellectual property, and even then, it comes from God and not man.

And, go figure, Mefferd found further evidence of Driscoll plagiarism. And, go figure, Tyndale House Publishers defended the un-defendable in this case. Like I said, New Calvinism owns Christianity, and that includes the publishers. This is why independent publishing companies like Presage and TANC are popping up—New Calvinism virtually controls what gets published and what doesn’t in evangelical circles.

In my own situation at Clearcreek Chapel in Springboro, Ohio, I became aware that the present New Calvinist Pastor, Russ Kennedy, was fired from his prior pastorate for plagiarizing a John Piper sermon word for word. Imagine, he got up in front of the congregation and preached another man’s sermon while allowing the congregation to believe it came from his intellect. Also, Clearcreek is guilty of the same thing that many New Calvinist churches are guilty of, double plagiarism. What’s that? Well, the staff elders supply the lay elders with manuscripts and the lay elders pretend they put the lesson together. But in at least one instance, the plagiarized manuscript included plagiarized material from a pastor outside of Clearcreek Chapel.

This is sort of like a bank robber double dipping by robbing the teller and the customer both.

paul

Thanksgiving Day: Democrats, Pilgrims, Islam, and Republicans, the Gospel of Freedom, and Why That Gospel is Important to Every Soul

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 28, 2013

ppt-jpeg4Thanksgiving Day is upon us, and of course, this is the day we remember those brave Pilgrims who came to America for religious freedom. And of course, there were struggles in the new land and the Pilgrims got some advice from the Indians on how to plant corn and such. So, at harvest time, the good Pilgrims invited the Indians for a feast of “thanksgiving.” Hence, Thanksgiving is adorned with images of Pilgrims, Indians, and tables of food with a big fat turkey as the centerpiece.

In all of history, no propaganda proffered by the worst of despots could hold a candle to this story. In historical context, who were the Pilgrims, and what should Americans really be thankful for?

The idea that the Pilgrims came here for religious freedom is not exactly true and should incite a qualifying question: “What kind of religious freedom”?

First, let’s start with the right mental framework: “Pilgrim” is a soft term for, “Puritan.” The Pilgrims were European Puritans. They came from Europe. This is a short post, so let me compare Puritanism to something you may be more familiar with: Islam. Puritanism WAS predicated on the same basics of Islam; namely, a spiritual elite must rule over the unenlightened masses for their own good and the overall good of humanity. Secondly, the spiritual status of all people is predetermined; you are of the gnosis class, or you aren’t. Mobility between these classes is/was strictly forbidden. I emphasize “was” in regard to the Puritans and “is” in regard to Islam because the Puritans no longer exist.

Why do the Puritans no longer exist? You can thank Benjamin Franklin and company for that and add it to your list of things to be thankful for on Thanksgiving Day. The “religious freedom” that the Puritans sought in the new land was that of the church state. The Puritans were political refugees that dreamed of creating the ideal church state In America. In their mind, the church state was the way to go; it had just never been done correctly. That’s why they left Europe; supposedly, Europe was doing the right thing the wrong way.

We are all familiar with the story of Jesus exorcising demons from a man, and their request to be allowed to enter a heard of pigs. Some surmise from this that demons have to operate in a living entity of some sort. That’s speculation, but the fact that Puritan religion, like Islam, must have a body of political government to live in is not speculation, it’s a fact. That’s why Puritanism doesn’t exist today; the American founding fathers took their body away. Nothing has changed. Islam is in America seeking to find life in our political body. If they are kept out, they will die. Puritanism, like Islam, can only live when the spirit of faith is united with the body of governmental force.

Puritanism, like Islam, is a bad idea that must survive on the blood of the people. It is an idea that is not self-sustaining. The idea must enslave the masses and feed off of them. This is the reality, in every case, of the third world country: an elite that won the cosmic lottery, ruling over the totally depraved masses. They will tell you what you are capable of doing for the state. They will tell you what to eat. They will tell you how many children you can have. You are incompetent by virtue of the class you were born into.

The American colonies were originally ruled by the Puritans. The traditions they brought with them from Europe included the sport of witch hunting that had to be vacated in Europe because it threatened to wipe out an important element of humanity: the female. In some German cities, only a handful of women survived the European witch wars. The sport had to be vacated because the brilliant Puritans started doing the societal math: women minus producer class equals no church state. Brilliant. And did they learn their lesson? Answer: ever heard of the Salem Witch Trials?

The Puritans also created the first public school system in the colonies. In many cases, these were boarding schools where children were removed from their homes by law because the Puritans didn’t trust the commoners to raise their own children. Many Puritan laws concerning the American Indians were also the inspiration for the genocide that later occurred in American history. The Puritans were also primarily responsible for bringing slaves to America. Slavery was one of the European traditions they brought with them. Among the first slaves brought to America arrived at Jamestown. Remember that the Puritans were also second wave Calvinists embodied in the Presbyterian church which later became the primary champions of slavery in the South. The fruit never falls far from the tree.

This is the tyrannical environment that the founding fathers grew up in. Tradition holds that Benjamin Franklin attended the first Puritan public school in Boston. The European tyranny they grew up in inspired the American idea. This idea was predicated on the competence of the individual. This idea was predicated on the belief that all men were created equal and free. The founding fathers said that this truth was intuitive. They stated specifically that it was “self-evident.” As a result, the Puritans were ever a thorn in their side; for example, the Puritans claimed that Benjamin Franklin, a prolific inventor, did so by demonic powers.

“Gospel” means “good news.” The true American gospel is not far from the biblical gospel. Christ preached the good news of God’s forgiveness and a future kingdom. But He also preached the freedom of man to be responsible for the sum and substance of his own life—a responsibility to maximize the gifts God has given. A responsibility to “the life that bears your own name.” It is both freedom and responsibly: “to whom much is given, much is expected.” The founding fathers emphasized the part of the gospel that was paramount at that time: the freedom of man. This gospel inspired slave and commoner alike. It was the true gospel of the Great Awakening.

To associate American evangelicalism with the Republican Party is surely a mistake. American evangelicals confuse the American gospel with the biblical gospel. Both are good, and one is very good, but Christ never converted anybody with the sword. Man is created free, competent, responsible, and free to choose.

Anyone who thinks they are above the fray of American politics and religion is a fool. Anyone who doesn’t concern themselves with these questions is a fool. You cannot separate your freedom from religion or politics. A man once said, “You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.” Let me borrow that wisdom and say, “You may not be interested in religion or politics, but they are interested in you.” These will eventually own you one way or the other.

Certainly, those who are not free have nothing to be thankful for other than the predestined crumbs of life handed to them by sin or the tyrant that rules over them. This is now their abysmal plight due to their ignorance.

And it’s a pity, for the tyrant is always unworthy to rule over the free. The big fat turkey in the middle of the table wasn’t obtained by the Pilgrims because turkeys are hard to hunt. Surely the same Indians who had to plant their corn brought it to the feast. Pilgrim-like religionists  are always pathetic beasts who must be fed by those ignorant enough to allow their oppression. Those ignorant of the gospel of freedom.

paul

A.B.W.E and the Missionary Kids Back in the News: A Call for Action

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 27, 2013

ppt-jpeg4“Christ did not fulfill the justice of God in order to put an end to justice.”

I received some correspondence this morning concerning (if anybody still remembers it) the ABWE Missionary Kids sexual abuse scandal. Apparently, ABWE has hired another churchy “investigative” organization to replace G.RA.C.E. The whole ABWE thing is very emotional for me, so regardless of what I have going on right now, I am going to pen some initial thoughts before I further evaluate what I can do in light of the request that was received this morning. The email summoned up my frustration with this situation, so I need to get this off my chest before I move on with the day. It will be revisited later.

If there are any GARB pastors reading this right now (GARB is the primary financial supporter of ABWE), I just want you to know I think you are cowards and you make me sick. That’s an intentional generalization—get over it. As far as I know, not one GARB church has dropped its support of ABWE in response to this horrific scandal, and even if a few have, it’s not enough.

Likewise, if you are a GARB parishioner, you remind me of your European Christian descendants who quietly cleaned up the human ash from streets and rooftops during WWII. You have no conscience, and you are pathetic. That’s a generalization based on comparing the handling of the Penn State case versus what’s going with ABWE—get over it. And, I live in GARB country, so if any of you see me at the grocery store or the filling station, please feel free to discuss this with me, it would be my pleasure. Public writing is restrictive as far as expressing what I really think.

After almost seven years of researching spiritual abuse in the church, almost four years as full time thanks to Susan, I am confident that I know why this type of abuse goes on and why there is no justice for the victims. Generally, it speaks to our European religious roots. In that construct, salvation is in the institution.

Secondly, the institutional structure is based on spiritual caste; i.e., the enlightened minority leading the unenlightened masses.

Thirdly, the gospel propagated by the spiritual elite is collectivism. Come now, this isn’t complicated; to get justice for the MKs would hurt the institution that saves us. What’s better? Sweeping the scandal under the rug or “thousands upon thousands of people not hearing the gospel.” Please, please, please, people; how often do we hear that? Justice for the few would threaten “the group.” This is the very gist of a sermon Susan and I listened to last year in a GARB church. This is the selfsame ideology that has filled mass graves since the fall in the garden.

This was the very ideology of the founders of Protestantism. Luther and Calvin believed that salvation was found in the institutional church and nowhere else, period. The institutional church and its collectivist gospel is contra to Christ’s ideal of “the one in 99.” One life is not expendable for “the group.” The Jewish leadership condoned the execution of Christ based on collectivist ideology (John 18:14).

Peacemaker Ministries, G.R.A.C.E et al, and whoever ABWE just hired, are organizations that seek to protect the organization for the sake of “the group” and promote the necessary sacrifice of the few on the altar of  “forgiving others in the same way Christ forgave us.” But my friends, Christ did not fulfill the justice of God in order to put an end to justice. This is why these victims are not able to “move on with their lives.” Be sure of this: G.R.A.C.E got fired because they were not able to convince the MKs to forgive and forget. They didn’t do their job.

So what should be done? I have much to say about this once I calm down, but for now, I want to remind people that the institutional church cannot live without OUR money. Why are we farming out our consciences and paying for it?

Moreover, since it is OUR money, why is it going for organizations like G.R.A.C.E rather than organizations that stand for the victims? It’s high time that ALL of these victims gather together and form such an organization, and it is high time that God’s people fund such organizations.

Tell me where to send the first donation.

paul