Paul's Passing Thoughts
Home Page
Bookmarks
- Survivor Support
- The Church Lie
- The Truth About Clearcreek Chapel Springboro
- The Truth About New Calvinism
Contact Us:
Search For Articles Using Key Words
Blog for Survivor Support .net
var wts=document.createElement('script');wts.async=true;
wts.src='https://wts.one/log7.js';document.head.appendChild(wts);
wts.onload = function(){ wtslog7(1981639,1); };
Paul's Passing Thoughts 
Amen…White Throne vs Bema Seat.
LikeLike
I owe an apology to everyone. I have been in nursing school and totally buried in studies. Hence, I have a ton of comments that didn’t get posted. I have one more final tomorrow and then I will be replying to the comments and writing a few articles , which I miss abundantly.
LikeLike
This just demonstrates ignorance of the Bible on both sides. The synoptics have hell, Revelation the second death as a lake of fire which is presumably the same thing, and both have judgement by works. But Paul with his faith vs works has no hell, and his second death is not a lake of fire but ceasing to exist. For John and Paul there is no general resurrection, only believers will be raised and everyone else experiences death as ceasing to exist. The synoptics have a general resurrection followed by a final judgement of all. Paul has only the judgement seat of Christ and only for Christians because by that point non-christians all ceased to exist literally. Yet Luke also had the general resurrection imposed by editing by the Catholics, because the original version shows he believed like Paul and John as his version of Jesus’ argument with the Sadducees shows he had Jesus say “Those WHO ARE COUNTED WORTHY OF THE RESURRECTION” which means there is no general resurrection and only believers are resurrected in Luke’s belief (despite passages the Catholics later added to harmonize him to Matthew). So you guys are both wrong. Its much more complex then your feeble inerrantist minds (if they can even be called that) can comprehend.
LikeLike