Paul's Passing Thoughts

PPT Called Out By Pastor Matt Higgins, and I Totally Accept the Challenge

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on January 17, 2015

HigginsI have been called out by the pastor of Calvary Heights Baptist Church in Martinsville, IN, and I intend to answer his challenge fully, personally, and expeditiously. In a recent post written by him, two of my articles were cited as examples of “discernment” blogging. For the other bloggers cited, see the endnotes.

Said pastor, Matt Higgins, defines “discernment bloggers” in this way: stalkers (trolls) who partake in witch hunts, and spend all of their time searching the internet for pastorate error to write about. The catchall nomenclature used by these bloggers is “heretic” which is a word Higgins claims they don’t properly understand, yet his corrective definition of “heresy” is something that I will address in this post. Also, according to Higgins, they seek to destroy ministries and force pastors to resign. Furthermore, according to Higgins, discernment bloggers are busybodies who have no right to address heresies taught in local churches they are not members of; they are sticking their noses in other people’s family matters. Moreover, according to Higgins, they are cowards who aren’t accountable to anyone and don’t have to face the pastors they criticize. They “hide behind” their PC monitors. Lastly, Higgins is calling on me to repent along with all other discernment bloggers. All in all, the crux of this probably boils down to his view of elder authority. 

Since I do not desire to be a coward, perhaps Higgins and I can meet together along with the elders or deacons at Calvary Heights Baptist Church. Since they pay his salary and have enabled him to falsely accuse me publically on the World Wide Web, maybe I will make the three hour drive out on a sunny Sunday afternoon and confront the whole lot of them. While we are at it, I could make sure the leadership of the church understands what this YRR type really believes. For certain, I am going to make sure the congregants thoroughly understand his soteriology. Trust me, especially in Southern Baptist circles, on average, 90% of a given SBC congregation has no real idea what these guys coming out of Southern or SW really believe.

First of all, let me define for Pastor Higgins what a discernment blogger is and why PPT is not discernment blogging. If he is going to bash discernment bloggers, he should know what one is.  A discernment blogger seeks to save the Protestant institutional church from harm and error. I do not believe the Protestant church is worth saving, and I can prove it was founded on the false gospel of progressive justification. I write about pastors to make that point, and could care less how many people follow them and whether or not they remain employed. However, I do believe people should have truthfully informed choices. For example, let’s make sure Higgins’ congregation really knows what he means when he speaks of the new birth just in case there may be a misunderstanding.

Secondly, if Higgins wants to bash discernment bloggers for using the word “heretic” while not knowing what it really means, he should also know what it really means before he criticizes others. The biblical definition of “heretic” follows: it is a person who belongs to a sect that divides with errant doctrine, or “sectarianism,” not the definition Higgins offered in his lame effort to correct others.

This brings to mind some things that his congregation may be interested in. I suppose it’s possible that Higgins may not qualify as a New Calvinist, but from what I gather so far, I seriously doubt it. New Calvinism is a super-sectarian movement that has split innumerable churches and families since 1970 and slowly integrates dictatorship-like leadership into local churches. The present emphasis on church membership and small groups at Calvary Heights Baptist is an all too familiar step to the iron fist control eventually demanded by New Calvinist pastors. Here is a schematic of how it works. Perhaps this is looking familiar to some at Calvary. Ironically, the discernment blog culture that Higgins decries skyrocketed in 2009 as a direct result of the New Calvinist movement which is based on gospel contemplationism and Calvin’s Sabbath Rest salvation whether the New Calvinist label is rejected or not.

Thirdly, notice how criticism of pastors and possible harm to the local church is the bottom line with Higgins and not the substance of the complaints. Why is that? Probably because like most YRR types that come out of Southern or SW, he believes the local church and the body of Christ are synonymous; ie., you’re saved by church membership and submission to “men of God.” Depending on what octane of YRR he is, he may also believe in elder absolution in the form of Calvin’s “power of the keys.” Basically, church discipline, not confined to public sins of the baser sort but rather anything that the elders deem sin, is a process that actually blots you out of the Book of Life upon elder authority.

People being excommunicated for merely asking too many questions is now an epidemic in SBC churches accordingly. If you are at Calvary and feeling pressure to become a formal member, and have not yet signed on the dotted line, you better pause and get educated as to what is going on in the SBC right now.

Note the double standard: Higgins, in the post being addressed here, bemoans discernment bloggers sticking their noses into the business of local churches, but yet, what happens if someone is excommunicated from a local SBC church in a given association? Right, they notify the other churches that the person is under discipline. See the double standard? Heresy charges against teachers who teach publically is a local issue, but grievances against parishioners who commit local sin is public? Really?

Another assertion by Higgins that didn’t make my introductory list is the idea that discernment bloggers claim infallibility. This is just more irony as Higgins argues from the standpoint of the Nicene Creed and Reformed orthodoxy in general. I doubt discernment bloggers claim infallibility, but I know they do reject Al Mohler’s assertion that Reformed elders are preordained of God to save God’s people from ignorance. If someone at Calvary can do it without being brought up on church discipline, they may simply ask Pastor Higgins, “Are you preordained by God to save me from ignorance?” If Higgins denies it, a good follow-up question would be, “So, you completely disagree with Al Mohler on that, right?”

A book could be written here if I addressed every creepy red flag raised by Higgins in his single post, but one may simply take note of his idea that pastors are ONLY accountable to “Christ and Scripture.” Calvary would do well to think about that statement and what it reveals about his mindset.

But my dog in the fight is not my disdain for the run-of-the-mill New Calvinist tyranny running amuck in the SBC (I am perfectly content to let the dead bury their own dead),  but that he came into my locale looking for a fight. His parishioners may excuse his bullying and cower under it, but I will not. He has zero authority.

So, is this what Calvary pays him for? To police discernment bloggers?

Dear friends, if he has a problem with discernment bloggers that he doesn’t even know, who apparently have not even talked about him until now, what will become of those at Calvary who dare to express an opinion?

paul

Endnotes:

https://1peter315.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/three-reasons-why-rick-warren-is-a-heretic/

https://adaughterofthereformation.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/is-n-t-wright-wrong-on-jesus/

http://surphside.blogspot.com/2012/01/matt-chandler-is-no-different-than-john.html

http://www.firstplumbline.net/html/francischan.html

https://biblicalconnection.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/quoting-heretics-tim-keller-and-others/

http://www.atruechurch.info/macarthur.html

http://truthwithsnares.org/2012/07/02/ed-stetzer-defends-mystic-francis-of-assisi/

http://www.jesusisprecious.org/wolves/billy_graham.htm

http://defendingcontending.com/2009/11/05/piper-the-slope-to-heresy/

http://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2013/01/wayne-grudems-pneumatology-identifies.html

http://www.onlinebaptist.com/home/topic/18042-reformed-pastors-and-the-kjv/

20 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on January 18, 2015 at 12:46 AM

    I deem it my duty to make sure all members there have thorough understanding of what he really believes.

    Like

  2. lydia's avatar lydia said, on January 18, 2015 at 10:40 AM

    So ask the members if they want to voluntarily give up their free speech? The problem is people don’t see it for what it is: Control. Does he really want to publicly declare you have no right to blog about doctrine?

    Many pastors are running scared, too. This is how they make their living. They actually start unwise fights.

    Like

  3. Andy's avatar Andy said, on January 18, 2015 at 11:30 AM

    There is only one way to deal with bullies. Since he’s thrown down the gauntlet, maybe you do need to take him up on his challenge and drive out to Indiana, pay a visit on a Sunday morning and punch him square in the “spiritual nose”, so to speak. (So there’s no misunderstanding, that was a figure of speech for those who don’t recognize it.)

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on January 18, 2015 at 12:49 PM

      Andy,
      That’s where it’s going because it looks like he has somehow insulated his congregation from the internet.

      Like

  4. johnimmel's avatar johnimmel said, on January 18, 2015 at 1:17 PM

    “To my fellow pastors, let’s ignore this garbage. Don’t write it. Don’t respond it. Don’t forward it. Don’t re-tweet it. Don’t listen to those podcasts. Don’t acknowledge it exists. God has not made you responsible to every rigid theological puritan located across the country with an axe to grind.”

    This is hilarious. I love it when these pots call kettles black. His entire post is an appeal to theological purity as a moral excuse to ignore an argument.

    Didn’t he do EXACTLY what he said no one else should do? hahahahahaha.

    He didn’t ignore you. He DID write … he DID respond. He has a twitter thingie on his blog . . . that is too funny.

    These guys are such a joy to watch.

    He is wrong on so many fundamental issues. I honestly can’t imagine taking this joker seriously.

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on January 18, 2015 at 1:55 PM

      Thanks for filling in what I don’t have all week to add John. Really, where to start with these guys? You read his post, and it’s like standing in front of Mount Everest with a shovel.

      Like

  5. johnimmel's avatar johnimmel said, on January 18, 2015 at 1:20 PM

    And like so many intellectual cowards I don’t see any place for comments on his blog.

    Am I missing something… is it hidden from me?

    If not… see point above.

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on January 18, 2015 at 2:00 PM

      John,
      It would appear that his congregants are unaware of his internet accounts.

      Like

  6. johnimmel's avatar johnimmel said, on January 18, 2015 at 1:29 PM

    “The free-for-all wrestling match of the Internet is no Council of Nicaea. Where the Council of Nicaea brought clarity and consensus, the discernment blogosphere and attack podcasts of our post-modern age only bring confusion and division.”

    This is so ridiculously wrong as to be a theological crime. The Council of Nicaea was a theological brawl that makes the internet look like a girls gone wild pillow fight.

    The “clarity and consensus” was obtained at the point of a sword and had been at the center of most of Church histories bloodiest fights ever since. They cut the heads off of 5000 Saxons who maintained the Homoian doctrine for heaven sake.

    This is like a Muslim defending Islam as a religion of peace …. sure its peaceful as soon as Allah rules the world via Shria law.

    There is no excuse for a seminary graduate to be this historically vacant.

    Like

  7. johnimmel's avatar johnimmel said, on January 18, 2015 at 2:23 PM

    Well… maybe his 124 followers will make everyone aware of his intellectual vacancy.

    Wait . . . what am I saying. Silly me… they have him as their pastor because they want intellectual vacancy.

    Like

  8. Christian's avatar Christian said, on January 18, 2015 at 5:43 PM

    He even has the “neo” beard!

    Like

  9. lydia's avatar lydia said, on January 18, 2015 at 8:58 PM

    “This is so ridiculously wrong as to be a theological crime. The Council of Nicaea was a theological brawl that makes the internet look like a girls gone wild pillow fight.

    The “clarity and consensus” was obtained at the point of a sword and had been at the center of most of Church histories bloodiest fights ever since. They cut the heads off of 5000 Saxons who maintained the Homoian doctrine for heaven sake.

    This is like a Muslim defending Islam as a religion of peace …. sure its peaceful as soon as Allah rules the world via Shria law.

    There is no excuse for a seminary graduate to be this historically vacant.”

    So true!! So is it an ignorance of history or they agree with it??? That is what I want to know!

    Like

  10. trust4himonly's avatar trust4himonly said, on January 18, 2015 at 9:58 PM

    Funny how he calls you to STOP “harassing” because you have no business telling him and HIS church the errors of Calvinism YET he calls on you to repent as if he has some authority over you. Contradiction , hmmm…… These self appointed “men of god” are truly special

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on January 18, 2015 at 10:11 PM

      In the original post? Not aware that he has responded to my pushback.

      Like


Leave a reply to paulspassingthoughts Cancel reply