Paul's Passing Thoughts

A Disturbing Post by John MacArthur

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on March 22, 2014

JM Road SignConfusion over sanctification, thanks to the Reformed camp, continues to reign in Christianity. The few who do get it in the institutional Reformed church are not calling out the perpetrators by name, and I think that is a big mistake. A post by John MacArthur is indicative of the horrible confusion being propagated among God’s people in regard to sanctification.

Per the typical, the grave concern is “Counterfeit Sanctification.”  This concept in and of itself is confusing and unbiblical. The overriding concern among the apostles and Christ was counterfeit justification, not a micromanaging of our motives in sanctification. To this point, in vogue among the Reformed is the idea that Galatians is primarily a sanctification concern. Hence, the tone of Galatians is lent to confusing justification and sanctification. The post by MacArthur reflects the reason that paralyzing fear and confusion are rampant in Christianity. Most Evangelicals in our day are ill prepared to lead others to Christ because they are unclear themselves on the difference between justification and sanctification.

Though much of the post is agreeable (no surprise since error always swims in the lake of truth), MacArthur begins to state confusing concepts in the third paragraph:

But that’s not true spiritual growth—it’s counterfeit. If you truly love the Lord, you can’t be willing to move the goalposts on biblical sanctification.

Then in the next paragraph…

There are many varieties of counterfeit sanctification. Some are easier to spot than others, but all lead to the same kind of spiritual shipwreck. Here are a few to be on the lookout for in your own life.

For sure, sanctification is deep waters, but notice the close correlation MacArthur makes between properly understanding sanctification and the separate issue of justification; viz, “If you truly love the Lord,” and “all lead to the same kind of spiritual shipwreck.” And there are “many varieties” with varying degrees of difficulty in ascertaining. But then MacArthur follows that up with warnings about things that the Bible specifically tells us to practice in sanctification!

Restraint is another possible kind of counterfeit sanctification. People don’t always avoid sin in favor of righteousness—sometimes they’re simply afraid to face the consequences of sin. They don’t necessarily have a heart to obey God or His Word. They’re just afraid of pursuing temptation because of the results.

The Bible instructs Christians to “abstain” (2Thess 4:3) from unrighteousness and even posits the fear of judgment as a motivation (2Thess 4:6). When offering an example of “counterfeit sanctification” that is something the Bible instructs us to do, it would seem that further qualification would be in order to prevent confusion. Nevertheless, MacArthur continues:

That fear could be the sign of a well-trained conscience. Maybe the person was raised in a Christian home and has built-in convictions about right and wrong. Maybe he grew up under the moral standard of God’s Word and can’t shake the nagging of his conscience. Rather than face a troubled conscience or the consequences of his sin, he’ll simply not do it.

But again, the New Testament, in many places, commands us to “keep a clear conscience before God.” The New Testament writers had much to say about utilizing and developing the conscience for purposes of spiritual growth. The Bible even speaks directly to a well-trained conscience being the opposite of spiritual immaturity (Romans 14).

My primary point of contention here is MacArthur’s steroidal hypocrisy. While chiding others for not being biblically clear and concise, he warns Christians against specific biblical imperatives with little qualification.

It’s eerily similar to the whole Reformed motif of sanctification being something that we shouldn’t try at home without the infinite wisdom of Reformed thought. Learn and do is a concept that is grasping at shadows without their deep knowledge of God’s word.

paul

58 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 3:40 PM

    DELETED

    Like

  2. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 3:58 PM

    DELETED

    Like

  3. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 4:24 PM

    Paul,

    You asked about judgment, not resurrection. “First resurrection” refers to the believer’s resurrection from spiritual death. The second [eternal] death has no power over them. Remember, this is apocalyptic literature and as such is highly symbolical. Still, your comment has nothing to do with the issue we are discussing. I don’t believe in the fusion of justification and sanctification. I don’t know why you insist that I do.
    No one believes law brings justification, but the reason it cannot justify is that sinners will not obey it and thus meet its righteousness requirements. It can only justify [declare righteous] righteous behavior. Only one has been born under it and fulfilled its rigorous demands. God has made him to be “righteousness” for the believer (1 Cor. 1:30). The law can now say nothing to us in regard to justification because Jesus has satisfied its demands for us.

    Now, I would appreciate it if you would at least attempt an answer about condemnation/justification. How can law be the standard [not basis] for one and not the other since both are but the opposite sides of the same issue?

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on March 24, 2014 at 4:37 PM

      Blah, blah , blah. Same old Augustinian filth. The first resurrection is associated with a judgement, look at verse 4. The second death is associated with one judge while the first has multiple judges, viz Matt 19:28.

      Like

  4. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 4:26 PM

    I have noticed a pattern here. Every time someone asks a question you can’t answer, you delete the comment.

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on March 24, 2014 at 4:31 PM

      You filthy liar–I have gone round and round with you on these issues.

      Like

  5. Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on March 24, 2014 at 4:59 PM

    Argy,

    Ya, and you can add, “never separate, but distinct,” “already, but not yet,” etc, etc, etc, ad nauseam.

    Like

  6. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 5:00 PM

    Sorry, “Jon” since words don’t really mean what they mean, I see no point in posting your comment.

    Like

  7. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 5:04 PM

    Paul,

    Surely you are not so obtuse that you can’t understand that justification and sanctification will always be found in the same people, but are at the same time separate and distinct works of God. That really isn’t a difficult concept.

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on March 24, 2014 at 5:20 PM

      It’s not difficult for you thou philosopher king. Your knowledge is soooo deep that words don’t say what they say and synonyms are really antonyms. Gag, you make me sick.

      Like

  8. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 5:49 PM

    DELETED

    Like

  9. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM

    DELETED

    Like

  10. Jon's avatar Jon said, on March 24, 2014 at 5:57 PM

    DELETED

    Like


Leave a reply to paulspassingthoughts Cancel reply