Paul's Passing Thoughts

MacDonald White Paper Followup: HBC Attempts to Expunge Infamous Church Discipline Video, Files Complaint Against PPT, Part 2; Post 11 of 20

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on October 3, 2013

For anyone who runs into this situation with You Tube, I thought documenting my journey in the procedure might be helpful. Besides, several have asked how it is going and if I am back to good standing with You Tube (not yet).  Determining the procedure is not easy, but it boils down to sending the gist of your argument to You Tube via a certain email address:,

On 10/1/13, an invalid copyright claim was made against me concerning video xx0_94DykXw.
Hence, the one strike I have on my account is completely unwarranted for the following

1. The complaint appears to be filed by a third party not the creator of the video.

2. The video is under Fair Use because it was a public announcement.

3. The video is under Fair Use because it was used to critique the announcement.

4. The creators of the video state in the video, that the substance of the video is not
original with them, but they are merely speaking for the Creator.

Paul Dohse.
cc. Ronald P. Keller, Attorney at law.

You Tube sent me a confirmation email with the following information 
that readers have also been asking about:

Re: [5-5592000001758] Invalid Copyright Claim

Thanks for contacting YouTube! You've reached the copyright and DMCA
compliance team. Your message has been received and is now queued for
review. Please note that general help inquiries won't be answered here. For
help with other site-related issues, please visit our Help Center at If you wish to report abuse or inappropriate
content, please visit, or if you
feel you have a privacy request, please visit

If you're requesting removal of a video that is allegedly infringing your
copyright, please make sure that you have provided us with all of the
required information in order to process your complaint. Providing
incomplete information may delay the processing of your claim. For the
requirements of DMCA notification, or if you have questions about our DMCA
policy, please see:

Did you know that YouTube offers copyright owners a tool for submitting
notifications more easily? If there are many videos to be removed, or you
expect to have an ongoing need to remove potentially infringing content
from YouTube, we suggest that you sign up for our Content Verification
Program, which electronically notifies us, removing any room for error, and
significantly increases the speed at which we are able to remove any
infringing content. To sign up for this tool please visit:

The YouTube Team

Maybe a reader can answer a question for me. 
In the following notice, any idea who or what "WITW" represents? 

Youtube warning (2)

Oligarchy Logo

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. A Mom said, on October 3, 2013 at 8:01 PM

    WITW – Walk in the Word.

    From “Since 2009, it has become far more difficult to track and document MacDonald’s compensation. Prior to 2010, Walk in the Word was a legally independent non-profit organization that was separate from Harvest Bible Chapel. But as of 2010, Walk in the Word was brought under the leadership of Harvest Bible Chapel as a ministry of HBC.”


  2. anonymous said, on October 3, 2013 at 8:57 PM

    Just makes your blood boil, doesn’t it? Use WITW and no one will ever be held personally accountable for filing the complaint. Clever stuff. From an organization/cult empire called “walk in the word”.



  3. anonymous said, on October 3, 2013 at 9:11 PM

    Ntice too the whole sorry mess is now under the grand coat of arms: “JM- James MacDonald”.

    Kind of like his pal TD Jakes. Take a look at the two websites and their “logos”.

    pparenly James get ideas from his frends…


  4. Julie Anne said, on October 3, 2013 at 10:07 PM

    Paul – Thanks for posting about this process. I think it is important for others to see how this kind of thing is handled.


  5. james jordan said, on October 4, 2013 at 12:12 AM

    Well, I found the video somewhere else anyway, unless its a different one. Is this the video of the 4 goofball elders where one of them says:

    “Church matters are not to be tried in the court of public opinion. Publicizing viewpoints rejected by the elder majority for any reason is Satanic to the core and must be dealt with very directly.”



  6. Amy Vecchione said, on October 4, 2013 at 7:02 AM

    Here’s the video


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: