I can’t seem to view the article. It doesn’t seem to pull up on either of my computers. Is it just me or is there something else I need to do? perhaps send me the link??
Paul,
Founders did publish the first edition of In Defense of the Decalogue. Not sure why they are no longer. You can read their announcement at the bottom of this page: http://www.founders.org/journal/fj43/news.html
Paul,
Founders did publish In Defense of the Decalogue when it first came out. Don’t know why they aren’t any longer. You can read their announcement about it here: http://www.founders.org/journal/fj43/news.html
(I googled “In Defense of the Decalogue” and “Founders Press” and this was the first hit.)
paulspassingthoughts said, on August 26, 2012 at 2:26 AM
Scott,
Just because they announce such on their blog does not mean there is a copy out their that they printed. This ministry has challenged Founders to produce proof that they published it, and to no avail. “Don’t know why they aren’t any longer.” That’s an easy one: either they never did, or soon realized that it is a damning treatise against a New Calvinist view of the law. Founders, and Ascol, have never been strangers to deception. Since 1981, their plan to take over the SBC has been contrived and covert.
paulspassingthoughts said, on August 26, 2012 at 2:27 AM
Scott,
Just because they announce such on their blog does not mean there is a copy out their that they printed. This ministry has challenged Founders to produce proof that they published it, and to no avail. “Don’t know why they aren’t any longer.” That’s an easy one: either they never did, or soon realized that it is a damning treatise against a New Calvinist view of the law. Founders, and Ascol, have never been strangers to deception. Since 1981, their plan to take over the SBC has been contrived and covert.
paulspassingthoughts said, on August 26, 2012 at 7:16 PM
Scott,
Look, this whole debate started because some folks want to disassociate the dots between New Calvinism, Gospel Sanctification, NCT, John Zens, Robert Brinsmead, and the Australian Forum. That’s impossible, unless John H. Armstrong is a liar. That wouldn’t surprise me, but there is too much additional documentation to back up what he has stated. Bottom line: Brinsmead rediscovered the lost Reformation gospel of progressive justification, and everything went from there. This is why I am continually harassed by people who want to disassociate the “Resurgence” (and indeed it is) from Brinsmead because he is SDA. It’s bad enough that the authentic Reformed gospel is progressive justification, but worse yet, a SDA guy rediscovered it. This is why I am being harassed to the point of seeking legal help that will hopefully include law enforcement in the near future. Regardless of the fact that Ascol and Reisinger might have differed on some NCT nuances, they all believed, and Ascol still does, in the false gospel of progressive justification. He is a vile false teacher who promotes a false gospel–the same gospel rediscovered by his buddies who founded the AF. This is just all documented fact.
Paul's Passing Thoughts 
Thanks Paul,
I can’t seem to view the article. It doesn’t seem to pull up on either of my computers. Is it just me or is there something else I need to do? perhaps send me the link??
Thanks so much,
Brenda
LikeLike
Brenda,
I posted an alternative link–please let me know.
LikeLike
If that doesn’t work and you have adobe (able to open pdf files), I will just send you the file. Email me at pmd@inbox.com
LikeLike
i cant get this up� i am not got with computers
http://www.thegoodtest.net/
http://www.gotquestions.org/
http://www.wayofthemaster.com/
http://www.markcahill.org
LikeLike
Paul,
Founders did publish the first edition of In Defense of the Decalogue. Not sure why they are no longer. You can read their announcement at the bottom of this page:
http://www.founders.org/journal/fj43/news.html
LikeLike
Paul,
Founders did publish In Defense of the Decalogue when it first came out. Don’t know why they aren’t any longer. You can read their announcement about it here:
http://www.founders.org/journal/fj43/news.html
(I googled “In Defense of the Decalogue” and “Founders Press” and this was the first hit.)
LikeLike
Scott,
Just because they announce such on their blog does not mean there is a copy out their that they printed. This ministry has challenged Founders to produce proof that they published it, and to no avail. “Don’t know why they aren’t any longer.” That’s an easy one: either they never did, or soon realized that it is a damning treatise against a New Calvinist view of the law. Founders, and Ascol, have never been strangers to deception. Since 1981, their plan to take over the SBC has been contrived and covert.
LikeLike
Scott,
Just because they announce such on their blog does not mean there is a copy out their that they printed. This ministry has challenged Founders to produce proof that they published it, and to no avail. “Don’t know why they aren’t any longer.” That’s an easy one: either they never did, or soon realized that it is a damning treatise against a New Calvinist view of the law. Founders, and Ascol, have never been strangers to deception. Since 1981, their plan to take over the SBC has been contrived and covert.
LikeLike
Here is the faculty bio for Barcellos at Reformed Baptist Seminary. It says that it was published by Founders Press.
http://reformedbaptistseminary.org/faculty.php
LikeLike
Scott,
Look, this whole debate started because some folks want to disassociate the dots between New Calvinism, Gospel Sanctification, NCT, John Zens, Robert Brinsmead, and the Australian Forum. That’s impossible, unless John H. Armstrong is a liar. That wouldn’t surprise me, but there is too much additional documentation to back up what he has stated. Bottom line: Brinsmead rediscovered the lost Reformation gospel of progressive justification, and everything went from there. This is why I am continually harassed by people who want to disassociate the “Resurgence” (and indeed it is) from Brinsmead because he is SDA. It’s bad enough that the authentic Reformed gospel is progressive justification, but worse yet, a SDA guy rediscovered it. This is why I am being harassed to the point of seeking legal help that will hopefully include law enforcement in the near future. Regardless of the fact that Ascol and Reisinger might have differed on some NCT nuances, they all believed, and Ascol still does, in the false gospel of progressive justification. He is a vile false teacher who promotes a false gospel–the same gospel rediscovered by his buddies who founded the AF. This is just all documented fact.
LikeLike