Paul's Passing Thoughts

The True Gospel Verses Calvinism: Part 1

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on July 15, 2012

“The difference between Calvinism and the true gospel is a fine line of distinction with eternal consequences.”

Justification is a finished work  that guarantees glorification apart from anything that happens in progressive sanctification….Justification is a finished work that guarantees glorification completely apart from progressive sanctification.”

“All bible verses must be interpreted by, verse….for justification, or verse….for sanctification.”

This post is actually in reply to the following question posted in the comment section of this blog:

Paul, please explain in layman’s terms how Calvinism views justification and sanctification.  I am trying to understand this. Does this have anything to do with the saint’s persevering?

My initial response was several hundred words which were deleted somehow when I was near completion; I must have hit a wrong key or something, but this time I will be smart and type it on Microsoft Word first.

Let me begin by addressing this part of the reader’s question first: “Does this have anything to do with the saints persevering?” No. Please, let’s just focus on the foundation—you can address all of the many other issues later, but you will be unable to address them definitively until you have an understanding in regard to the first part of your question: “….how Calvinism views justification and sanctification.”

Short answer: It views them as being the same thing, and that’s a false gospel, and I will explain why (the forthcoming long answer). But first, know this: election does not necessarily mean that God predetermined before creation who was/is going to be saved and not saved. How God weaves His sovereignty together with our choices is a mystery. For example,  “The heart of man plans his way, but the Lord establishes his steps (Proverbs 16:9).”  Does this mean that we shouldn’t bother planning because the Lord has already determined our steps? Hardly. Proverbs 16:9 is speaking of the mystery/paradox of God’s weaving together of what we do and His sovereign will. Does prayer change things? Certainly it does. When we present the gospel to someone, do we say, “I am just here to find out whether you are one of God’s chosen or not. So, I am going to present the gospel to you, and if you believe and repent, you are one of the chosen, if you don’t, you are toast for eternity.” No, we persuade with all diligence and knowledge (like the apostle Paul did) as if it depends on us, because to some degree, it does. Bottom line:

How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? (Romans 10:14).

God’s offer of salvation is a legitimate offer.

Justification 101 (For now, forget about sanctification, this concerns justification only!)

Nevertheless, when they/we believe, we know it’s because of Romans 8:30, which will be the focus of my explanation/long answer. Let’s now observe Romans 8:30:

And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

Done deal. Finished before the creation of the world. He predestined us, then called us, then justified us, and finally, glorified us. The word “justified” is dikaioo. It is a legal declaration of innocence that sets one free. Christians are declared righteous before creation, and glorification (when we will be instantly transformed completely at the resurrection) is guaranteed. We cannot mess that up. It’s a finished work by God before we were born. How can we possibly mess that up? We can’t.

Law/Justification [Gospel]

Also, the law can’t touch us. Why? We are already declared righteous, that’s why. Stop everything you are thinking about and take note of this: the law is no longer the standard for maintaining our salvation/justification.  Do not turn your mind off here because of familiarity—this is not what you think it is. Pay attention! The difference between Calvinism and the true gospel is a fine line of distinction with eternal consequences. Caution: this is a concept that it so simple that it escapes us. We are no longer ….key word alert,….UNDER the law. In the book of Romans, Chapter 7, Paul compares our relationship to the law as a marriage covenant that is no longer valid because one of the spouses died:

Do you not know, brothers —for I am speaking to men who know the law—that the law has authority over a man only as long as he lives? 2 For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage. 3 So then, if she marries another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress, even though she marries another man.4 So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God.

Now, I will slightly digress and bring danger of confusion, but will then quickly return to the subject of justification. Paul is talking about justification in this passage, and then finishes the thought with a mention of justification’s purpose; sanctification: “….in order that we might bear fruit to God.” BUT, as we shall see, other than the fact that justification makes sanctification (our kingdom living) possible, the two are totally separate, and the separation of the two is the key to understanding the issue at hand, and the true gospel in general.

….for justification.

We, as Christians, are dead to the law. It can’t touch us. We are no longer UNDER it:

Romans 2:12

All who sin apart from the law will also perish apart from the law, and all who sin under the law will be judged by the law.

But not us. The law can’t judge us, we are no longer under it:

Romans 3:19

Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God.

Note that the world is under the law, but we are not. We have no regard for the law whatsoever, ….for justification.

Slavery/Justification

Paul also described our relationship to the law in regard to not being enslaved by it. To be evaluated by the law is to be in bondage to it:

Romans 6:14

For sin shall no longer be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace.

Galatians 4

21 Tell me, you who want to be under the law, are you not aware of what the law says? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and the other by the free woman. 23 His son by the slave woman was born according to the flesh, but his son by the free woman was born as the result of a divine promise.

In fact, Paul said  for us Christians, ALL things are lawful!

1 Corinthians 6:12

All things are lawful for me, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be mastered by anything.

All things are lawful, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful, but not all things edify.

But not expedient, or profitable….

….for sanctification. Sanctification 101

There are two kinds of sanctification, but only one kind of justification, and the two sanctification are totally separate from justification. If not, we are eternally doomed. Justification must be a finished work that we have no part in except for showing others how they can be justified like we are; saved, if you will. Note: Romans 8:30, the epic verse of justification, does not include the subject of sanctification because the two must be separate. One is a finished work (justification), the other, sanctification (or, kingdom living) is progressive. In fact, Dr. Jay E. Adams states well that sanctification (our Christian life) does not in any way draw it’s life or power from justification because justification is a legal declaration that determines our POSITION:

The problem with Sonship™ [same thing as New Calvinism prior to 2008] is that it misidentifies the source of sanctification (or the fruitful life of the children of God) as justification. Justification, though a wonderful fact, a ground of assurance, and something never to forget, cannot produce a holy life through strong motive for it. As a declaration of forgiveness, pardon, and adoption into the family of God, it is (remember) a legal act. It changes the standing, but not the condition, of the person who is justified.

That’s because justification is a finished work, and discipleship (sanctification) is not; it’s progressive. But, there is also a positional sanctification that is also a finished work that even preceded justification. But like justification, it is a finished work and cannot produce progressive life, because for crying out loud, a finished work doesn’t continue to produce a progression. This would seem evident. Remember this: sanctification is a word that merely means, “to set apart.” So, sanctification is a progressive separating from the world. As we progress in our sanctification, we look more like Christ, and less like the world. But there is also a positional separation from the world that is also a finished work that includes predestination, election, calling, justification, and a setting apart:

Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God (1Corinthians 6:11).

Notice the past tense of the verse. Our position is a finished work. We were washed, set apart, and justified. Peter asked Jesus to wash him. But Christ told him that there was no need for him to be washed because it had already been done, he only needed a daily washing of his feet:

The evening meal was being served, and the devil had already prompted Judas Iscariot, son of Simon, to betray Jesus. Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that he had come from God and was returning to God; so he got up from the meal, took off his outer clothing, and wrapped a towel around his waist. After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.  He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, are you going to wash my feet?” Jesus replied, “You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand.”  “No,” said Peter, “you shall never wash my feet.” Jesus answered, “Unless I wash you, you have no part with me.” “Then, Lord,” Simon Peter replied, “not just my feet but my hands and my head as well!” Jesus answered, “A person who has had a bath needs only to wash his feet; his whole body is clean. And you are clean, though not every one of you.” For he knew who was going to betray him, and that was why he said not everyone was clean (John 13:2-11).

Justification and the New Birth

Though justification is a finished work, it passes the torch to something that is a mark of true salvation. This is where sanctification draws its power. This element of sanctification is a Proof of Purchase Seal that you and I have been purchased by God with the price of His Son. It is the new birth. We are born of the Holy Spirit into new creatures. Our spiritual growth is now a colaboring with the Holy Spirit who indwells us. He also colabored with saints of old, but His permanent indwelling of New Testament believers is probably related to the engrafting of the Gentiles. But whatever the reasons, remember that the saints of old were also justified by faith alone, and like us, they were not UNDER the law….for justification.

Paul makes this point in Galatians 3:13-18:

Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.” He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit.

Brothers, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case. The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say “and to seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” meaning one person, who is Christ. What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise. For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on a promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.

Hence, the law CANNOT be our standard…. for justification. Paul makes that clear by pointing out that the law didn’t come for 430 years after Abraham was justified according to the covenant of promise. Nevertheless, we must be born again (new birth). Again, the new birth is proof of Justification, but is not powered by it. The new birth is the indwelling Holy Spirit colaboring with His new creatures. Theologians call this, regeneration. We, like the saints of old, MUST BE BORN AGAIN. Before the cross, and before Pentecost, Christ made this clear to Nicodemus in the present tense, and expressed surprise that he was ignorant of the new birth (John, chapter 3).

And this is very, very important: regeneration does not work towards/for glorification. Sanctification (the progressive type) is NOT a link to glorification. Remember, glorification is a finished work. Romans 8:30 speaks of it in the past tense. It is the guarantee of our justification. Both happened before the creation of the world. Some theologians call glorification, “final sanctification.” Perish the thought! Glorification is the manifestation of positional sanctification (both are final, finished works), NOT the completion of progressive sanctification. Though the completion of progressive sanctification happens at the same time as glorification—glorification is a finished work, and therefore is not the culmination of progressive sanctification’s progressive work; it is rather, redemption. Redemption is the manifestation of glorification when God cashes in on his purchase:

There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea.  People will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken. At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near  (Luke 21: 25-28).

Though the Bible speaks of glorification as a future event, Romans 8:30 refers to it in the past tense. This is because it does not need progressive sanctification to complete it (again, progressive sanctification is not included in the list of Rom. 8:30), and the past tense usage points to the guarantee that accompanies justification.

Justification and progressive sanctification are totally separate. Progressive sanctification DOES NOT link justification to glorification. Justification is a finished work  that guarantees glorification apart from anything that happens in progressive sanctification. This is why progressive sanctification is excluded from this paramount justification verse….for justification, and speaks of justification and glorification in the past tense. Justification is a finished work that guarantees glorification completely apart from progressive sanctification.

One Law; Three Relationships/Standards

Hence, the law, which includes all of Scripture (see Matthew 4:4, 2Timothy 3:16) must always be read in this context: ….for justification, or….for sanctification. The standard/relationship…. for [our] justification is ZERO LAW. The standard/relationship….for [our] sanctification is….100% law! Why not? It’s not related to our justification anyway! Therefore:

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven  (Matthew 5:17-20).

The word for “set aside” is lou. It means to “relax” or loosen. That is, in regard to the “least of these commandments.” So, do we interpret this way: “Whoever practices and teaches these commands”….for justification; or, ….for sanctification ? The framing of a house and the rightness of its foundation will determine its quality. Are the frame and the foundation going to be perfect? No. But is that the standard? One would hope so. We should strive for perfection in sanctification for many reasons, but most of all, because it has no bearing on our justification which is a settled issue. However, Christ links a poor attitude towards the law in sanctification to an absence of the new birth/ new creaturehood:

For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Unfortunately, the relationship/standard in regard to the unregenerate is perfection ….for justification because they are UNDER the law and in bondage to it. Christians are free from the law for justification and “uphold” (Romans 3:31) it…. for sanctification. That is why James refers to it as the “perfect law of liberty” in James 1:25. All Bible verses must be interpreted by, verse….for justification, or verse….for sanctification.

Eschatology and Justification

This is why in the study of biblical last things (eschatology), we find two resurrections and two judgments. One resurrection and judgment for the saved, and a separate resurrection and judgment for the unsaved. Unfortunately, the standard for the second set will be perfection, and nobody will measure up (Revelation 20:4-6; 11,12). We will be a part of the “resurrection of the just” (Luke 14:14) and will not stand in such a judgment because we have already been declared just. Our judgment will be for rewards:

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad (2 Corinthians 5:10).

Obviously, we can’t do this:  2Cor 5:10…. for justification. That would be a huge problem.

I will conclude with a visual chart to help clarify the above. In the second part, we will examine the difference between this and Calvinism.

176 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 9:44 PM

    Argo,

    Please understand that “all men” means all peoples not every individual. Therefore, there is no contradiction between “I came to redeem the elect” and I came to redeem “all peoples.” If he came to redeem every individual on the face of the earth, why aren’t all redeemed? Did he fail his mission? In John 17, he clearly stated that he “prays not for the world but for those whom the Father had given him.” The high priest intercedes for none but those for whom he has offered sacrifice.

    Like

  2. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM

    Argo,

    Now perhaps you could answer my question about how anyone ever comes to Christ if no one seeks him and,in fact, all sinners run from the light. If no one seeks him, how does anyone ever find him? Is that by accident?

    Like

  3. Argo's avatar Argo said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:12 PM

    Lin,

    Thank you. That is really, really nice of you to say.

    JeffB,

    Yes, I do hear you loud and clear. Believe me I used to walk in the presumptive paradox of election and free will for years and years as a staunch neo-Calvinist. However, I must confess that I am on a fundamental level so very uncomfortable with that paradox, and always have been…and one of the reasons is that I’m just not convinced that scripture draws the same conclusions regarding paradox that we do. That is, I understand the verses say what they say (e.g. John 6:44), but I’m not convinced that commonly held conclusions about those verses referring to election are, in fact, as true as many assume. Bottom line is, I need much more evidence before I’m going to cop to “It’s very clear from scripture that this issue is very unclear”. I know this puts me in the minority (and likely in the corner wearing a tall, conical hat and wondering who is going to be kicking my ass on the playground later). Again, a good example is John 6:44. How many times have we read that and just categorically assumed that it was referring to the doctrine of election? While at the same time a simple cursory reading of the chapter reveals the verse isn’t speaking to election at all; for if it were, it would be the proverbial round peg in the square hole. It just doesn’t fit: “I think I’d like a Coke, Fries, and a Cheeseburger. I like clouds. And the apple pie for dessert.” You don’t need some sixty-dollar concordance, or a MDiv to discover what Jesus is really talking about. But our hypnotic devotion to our orthodoxy has made what should be so easily graspable to our rational minds (and is, if you just let go and READ IT) so very, very confusing. For example, we have confused the idea of scripture’s infallibility. What that really means is that major concepts addressed in the bible should be viewed as axiomatic and necessary to a happy, fulfilled, God-glorifying life: seeking wisdom, sobriety, love of neighbor, love of God, atoning work of Christ, responsibility to truth and honesty, hard work, etc., etc., and on and on. But the neo-Calvinists don’t believe that. What they believe is that infallibility means that any verse can be taken utterly out of context, stood suspended in space like the Earth, and declared to mean whatever the Calvinist wants it to mean…because it’s infallible.

    Finally, I might add, I often wonder why people like me are so berated because I believe in man’s rational ability to choose, with the tentative admission that predestination may indeed be a Biblical concept that exists in tension with free will, but the Calvinists never get pressed about how they essentially teach that ONLY election is true and free will is rank heresy. According to them, we can’t even be of any use in sanctification…it’s all gospel. Don’t mean to whine but…waaaay unfair.

    Why do I have to explain John 6:44, but they never have to explain John 6:45b (choosing to listen, choosing to learn, so that they may be drawn to Christ), or John 6:47(choosing to believe), or John 6:51 (choosing to eat of the Bread of Life). Or the rich young ruler, “One thing you lack GO and SELL…”. Looks like Jesus is explicitly telling him to DO something that will CONTRIBUTE to his salvation. So…er, is Jesus now a heretic as well?

    I’m just saying…

    Like

  4. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:18 PM

    Since people here seem to like J. C. Ryle so much, I thought it might be interesting to post Ryle’s comment on John 6:44. He wrote, “The general lesson of the sentence,. apart from the connection, is one of vast importance. Our Lord lays down the great principal ‘that no man whatsoever can come to Christ by faith, and really believe in Him, unless God the Father draws him so to come, and inclines his will to believe.’ The nature of man since the fall is so corrupt and depraved , that even when Christ is made known and preached to him, he will not come to him and believe in HIm, without the special grace of God inclining his will and giving him a disposition to come. Moral suasion and advice alone will not bring him. He must be ‘drawn.’

    This is no doubt a very humbling truth, and one which in every age has called forth the hatred and opposition of man. The favorite notion of man is that he can do what he likes,–repent or not repent, believe or not believe, come to Christ or not come, entirely at his own discretion. In fact, man likes to think that his salvation is in his own power. Such notions are flatly contradictory to the text before us. The words our Lord here are clear and unmistakable, and cannot be explained away.”

    Like

  5. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:23 PM

    Argo,

    Actually, we do not contend that John 6:44 refers to election at all. We contend that it refers to effectual calling that is according to God’s eternal purpose.

    Like

  6. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:28 PM

    Argo,

    Perhaps you can point us to a scripture that says sinners have a free will.

    Like

  7. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:32 PM

    Argo,

    So you think the rich young ruler could have contributed to his salvation by selling his goods and giving to the poor? Wow! That sounds like works salvation to me.

    Like

  8. Argo's avatar Argo said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:33 PM

    Randy,

    It is impossible to be both elected AND saved. If your going to hell was never a possibility in the first place, then you weren’t ever saved, and the Cross is moot. How can you be saved from hell if hell was NEVER in the cards for you?

    Being neither a Catholic in Spain, nor a citizen in Calvin’s Geneva, I’ve never suffered inquisitions, and I’m not starting with yours. You can say “With God, all things are possible”. You can say “It’s a paradox”. You can shrug. You can cry blind faith, or level accusations of ignorance. You can subterfuge with a thousand filibustering questions. But you simply cannot say that it makes sense. Sorry about that.

    Like

  9. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:40 PM

    Argo,

    Please clarify for me whether we are talking about New Calvinists or Calvinist. Which is it who believes that ” that infallibility means that any verse can be taken utterly out of context, stood suspended in space like the Earth?” I am a Calvinist and I know I don’t believe that.

    Like

  10. Argo's avatar Argo said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:42 PM

    Randy, I’m trying to be civil. Please stop being petulant and abusive. Jesus was telling him that salvation required a conscious decision to die to self, and follow Christ whole heartedly. That’s not “works” salvation; that’s just work. And you know what, yeah, it’s not easy following Christ. It takes work. It takes a conscious, purposeful decision to work to glorify God in your life…it takes obedience, effort, and a rational mind. I’m sorry that poses a problem for you. I guess Piper would have said, “Go home and enjoy your mansion…it’s possible you’re saved; you’ll find out if you wait around long enough”.

    Like


Leave a reply to Argo Cancel reply