Paul's Passing Thoughts

The True Gospel Verses Calvinism: Part 1

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on July 15, 2012

“The difference between Calvinism and the true gospel is a fine line of distinction with eternal consequences.”

Justification is a finished work  that guarantees glorification apart from anything that happens in progressive sanctification….Justification is a finished work that guarantees glorification completely apart from progressive sanctification.”

“All bible verses must be interpreted by, verse….for justification, or verse….for sanctification.”

This post is actually in reply to the following question posted in the comment section of this blog:

Paul, please explain in layman’s terms how Calvinism views justification and sanctification.  I am trying to understand this. Does this have anything to do with the saint’s persevering?

My initial response was several hundred words which were deleted somehow when I was near completion; I must have hit a wrong key or something, but this time I will be smart and type it on Microsoft Word first.

Let me begin by addressing this part of the reader’s question first: “Does this have anything to do with the saints persevering?” No. Please, let’s just focus on the foundation—you can address all of the many other issues later, but you will be unable to address them definitively until you have an understanding in regard to the first part of your question: “….how Calvinism views justification and sanctification.”

Short answer: It views them as being the same thing, and that’s a false gospel, and I will explain why (the forthcoming long answer). But first, know this: election does not necessarily mean that God predetermined before creation who was/is going to be saved and not saved. How God weaves His sovereignty together with our choices is a mystery. For example,  “The heart of man plans his way, but the Lord establishes his steps (Proverbs 16:9).”  Does this mean that we shouldn’t bother planning because the Lord has already determined our steps? Hardly. Proverbs 16:9 is speaking of the mystery/paradox of God’s weaving together of what we do and His sovereign will. Does prayer change things? Certainly it does. When we present the gospel to someone, do we say, “I am just here to find out whether you are one of God’s chosen or not. So, I am going to present the gospel to you, and if you believe and repent, you are one of the chosen, if you don’t, you are toast for eternity.” No, we persuade with all diligence and knowledge (like the apostle Paul did) as if it depends on us, because to some degree, it does. Bottom line:

How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? (Romans 10:14).

God’s offer of salvation is a legitimate offer.

Justification 101 (For now, forget about sanctification, this concerns justification only!)

Nevertheless, when they/we believe, we know it’s because of Romans 8:30, which will be the focus of my explanation/long answer. Let’s now observe Romans 8:30:

And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

Done deal. Finished before the creation of the world. He predestined us, then called us, then justified us, and finally, glorified us. The word “justified” is dikaioo. It is a legal declaration of innocence that sets one free. Christians are declared righteous before creation, and glorification (when we will be instantly transformed completely at the resurrection) is guaranteed. We cannot mess that up. It’s a finished work by God before we were born. How can we possibly mess that up? We can’t.

Law/Justification [Gospel]

Also, the law can’t touch us. Why? We are already declared righteous, that’s why. Stop everything you are thinking about and take note of this: the law is no longer the standard for maintaining our salvation/justification.  Do not turn your mind off here because of familiarity—this is not what you think it is. Pay attention! The difference between Calvinism and the true gospel is a fine line of distinction with eternal consequences. Caution: this is a concept that it so simple that it escapes us. We are no longer ….key word alert,….UNDER the law. In the book of Romans, Chapter 7, Paul compares our relationship to the law as a marriage covenant that is no longer valid because one of the spouses died:

Do you not know, brothers —for I am speaking to men who know the law—that the law has authority over a man only as long as he lives? 2 For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage. 3 So then, if she marries another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress, even though she marries another man.4 So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God.

Now, I will slightly digress and bring danger of confusion, but will then quickly return to the subject of justification. Paul is talking about justification in this passage, and then finishes the thought with a mention of justification’s purpose; sanctification: “….in order that we might bear fruit to God.” BUT, as we shall see, other than the fact that justification makes sanctification (our kingdom living) possible, the two are totally separate, and the separation of the two is the key to understanding the issue at hand, and the true gospel in general.

….for justification.

We, as Christians, are dead to the law. It can’t touch us. We are no longer UNDER it:

Romans 2:12

All who sin apart from the law will also perish apart from the law, and all who sin under the law will be judged by the law.

But not us. The law can’t judge us, we are no longer under it:

Romans 3:19

Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God.

Note that the world is under the law, but we are not. We have no regard for the law whatsoever, ….for justification.

Slavery/Justification

Paul also described our relationship to the law in regard to not being enslaved by it. To be evaluated by the law is to be in bondage to it:

Romans 6:14

For sin shall no longer be your master, because you are not under the law, but under grace.

Galatians 4

21 Tell me, you who want to be under the law, are you not aware of what the law says? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and the other by the free woman. 23 His son by the slave woman was born according to the flesh, but his son by the free woman was born as the result of a divine promise.

In fact, Paul said  for us Christians, ALL things are lawful!

1 Corinthians 6:12

All things are lawful for me, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be mastered by anything.

All things are lawful, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful, but not all things edify.

But not expedient, or profitable….

….for sanctification. Sanctification 101

There are two kinds of sanctification, but only one kind of justification, and the two sanctification are totally separate from justification. If not, we are eternally doomed. Justification must be a finished work that we have no part in except for showing others how they can be justified like we are; saved, if you will. Note: Romans 8:30, the epic verse of justification, does not include the subject of sanctification because the two must be separate. One is a finished work (justification), the other, sanctification (or, kingdom living) is progressive. In fact, Dr. Jay E. Adams states well that sanctification (our Christian life) does not in any way draw it’s life or power from justification because justification is a legal declaration that determines our POSITION:

The problem with Sonship™ [same thing as New Calvinism prior to 2008] is that it misidentifies the source of sanctification (or the fruitful life of the children of God) as justification. Justification, though a wonderful fact, a ground of assurance, and something never to forget, cannot produce a holy life through strong motive for it. As a declaration of forgiveness, pardon, and adoption into the family of God, it is (remember) a legal act. It changes the standing, but not the condition, of the person who is justified.

That’s because justification is a finished work, and discipleship (sanctification) is not; it’s progressive. But, there is also a positional sanctification that is also a finished work that even preceded justification. But like justification, it is a finished work and cannot produce progressive life, because for crying out loud, a finished work doesn’t continue to produce a progression. This would seem evident. Remember this: sanctification is a word that merely means, “to set apart.” So, sanctification is a progressive separating from the world. As we progress in our sanctification, we look more like Christ, and less like the world. But there is also a positional separation from the world that is also a finished work that includes predestination, election, calling, justification, and a setting apart:

Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God (1Corinthians 6:11).

Notice the past tense of the verse. Our position is a finished work. We were washed, set apart, and justified. Peter asked Jesus to wash him. But Christ told him that there was no need for him to be washed because it had already been done, he only needed a daily washing of his feet:

The evening meal was being served, and the devil had already prompted Judas Iscariot, son of Simon, to betray Jesus. Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that he had come from God and was returning to God; so he got up from the meal, took off his outer clothing, and wrapped a towel around his waist. After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.  He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, are you going to wash my feet?” Jesus replied, “You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand.”  “No,” said Peter, “you shall never wash my feet.” Jesus answered, “Unless I wash you, you have no part with me.” “Then, Lord,” Simon Peter replied, “not just my feet but my hands and my head as well!” Jesus answered, “A person who has had a bath needs only to wash his feet; his whole body is clean. And you are clean, though not every one of you.” For he knew who was going to betray him, and that was why he said not everyone was clean (John 13:2-11).

Justification and the New Birth

Though justification is a finished work, it passes the torch to something that is a mark of true salvation. This is where sanctification draws its power. This element of sanctification is a Proof of Purchase Seal that you and I have been purchased by God with the price of His Son. It is the new birth. We are born of the Holy Spirit into new creatures. Our spiritual growth is now a colaboring with the Holy Spirit who indwells us. He also colabored with saints of old, but His permanent indwelling of New Testament believers is probably related to the engrafting of the Gentiles. But whatever the reasons, remember that the saints of old were also justified by faith alone, and like us, they were not UNDER the law….for justification.

Paul makes this point in Galatians 3:13-18:

Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.” He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit.

Brothers, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case. The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say “and to seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” meaning one person, who is Christ. What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise. For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on a promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.

Hence, the law CANNOT be our standard…. for justification. Paul makes that clear by pointing out that the law didn’t come for 430 years after Abraham was justified according to the covenant of promise. Nevertheless, we must be born again (new birth). Again, the new birth is proof of Justification, but is not powered by it. The new birth is the indwelling Holy Spirit colaboring with His new creatures. Theologians call this, regeneration. We, like the saints of old, MUST BE BORN AGAIN. Before the cross, and before Pentecost, Christ made this clear to Nicodemus in the present tense, and expressed surprise that he was ignorant of the new birth (John, chapter 3).

And this is very, very important: regeneration does not work towards/for glorification. Sanctification (the progressive type) is NOT a link to glorification. Remember, glorification is a finished work. Romans 8:30 speaks of it in the past tense. It is the guarantee of our justification. Both happened before the creation of the world. Some theologians call glorification, “final sanctification.” Perish the thought! Glorification is the manifestation of positional sanctification (both are final, finished works), NOT the completion of progressive sanctification. Though the completion of progressive sanctification happens at the same time as glorification—glorification is a finished work, and therefore is not the culmination of progressive sanctification’s progressive work; it is rather, redemption. Redemption is the manifestation of glorification when God cashes in on his purchase:

There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea.  People will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken. At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near  (Luke 21: 25-28).

Though the Bible speaks of glorification as a future event, Romans 8:30 refers to it in the past tense. This is because it does not need progressive sanctification to complete it (again, progressive sanctification is not included in the list of Rom. 8:30), and the past tense usage points to the guarantee that accompanies justification.

Justification and progressive sanctification are totally separate. Progressive sanctification DOES NOT link justification to glorification. Justification is a finished work  that guarantees glorification apart from anything that happens in progressive sanctification. This is why progressive sanctification is excluded from this paramount justification verse….for justification, and speaks of justification and glorification in the past tense. Justification is a finished work that guarantees glorification completely apart from progressive sanctification.

One Law; Three Relationships/Standards

Hence, the law, which includes all of Scripture (see Matthew 4:4, 2Timothy 3:16) must always be read in this context: ….for justification, or….for sanctification. The standard/relationship…. for [our] justification is ZERO LAW. The standard/relationship….for [our] sanctification is….100% law! Why not? It’s not related to our justification anyway! Therefore:

Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven  (Matthew 5:17-20).

The word for “set aside” is lou. It means to “relax” or loosen. That is, in regard to the “least of these commandments.” So, do we interpret this way: “Whoever practices and teaches these commands”….for justification; or, ….for sanctification ? The framing of a house and the rightness of its foundation will determine its quality. Are the frame and the foundation going to be perfect? No. But is that the standard? One would hope so. We should strive for perfection in sanctification for many reasons, but most of all, because it has no bearing on our justification which is a settled issue. However, Christ links a poor attitude towards the law in sanctification to an absence of the new birth/ new creaturehood:

For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Unfortunately, the relationship/standard in regard to the unregenerate is perfection ….for justification because they are UNDER the law and in bondage to it. Christians are free from the law for justification and “uphold” (Romans 3:31) it…. for sanctification. That is why James refers to it as the “perfect law of liberty” in James 1:25. All Bible verses must be interpreted by, verse….for justification, or verse….for sanctification.

Eschatology and Justification

This is why in the study of biblical last things (eschatology), we find two resurrections and two judgments. One resurrection and judgment for the saved, and a separate resurrection and judgment for the unsaved. Unfortunately, the standard for the second set will be perfection, and nobody will measure up (Revelation 20:4-6; 11,12). We will be a part of the “resurrection of the just” (Luke 14:14) and will not stand in such a judgment because we have already been declared just. Our judgment will be for rewards:

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad (2 Corinthians 5:10).

Obviously, we can’t do this:  2Cor 5:10…. for justification. That would be a huge problem.

I will conclude with a visual chart to help clarify the above. In the second part, we will examine the difference between this and Calvinism.

176 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. trust4himonly's avatar trust4himonly said, on July 17, 2012 at 8:59 AM

    Oh yes Lin I read on the TWW about Doug Wilson’s slavery bit- awful….
    I think John MacArthur wrote a book called Slave. Never read it because why get depressed. Also, did not know who Doug Wilson was when I read the article on TWW and saw his face then I remembered him.
    I saw a video of him stating that the churches responsibility was to take over all areas of government and business. Obviously someone is not quite taking Scripture seriously or are putting in their own version of Scripture. Some scathe stuff.

    Like

  2. trust4himonly's avatar trust4himonly said, on July 17, 2012 at 9:01 AM

    My spell check- some scary stuff.

    Like

  3. Unknown's avatar Anonymous said, on July 17, 2012 at 9:11 AM

    trust4himonly,

    Please forgive me for assuming you had a Berean spirit. I didn’t realize your mind was closed on this subject. The reality is, there is a great deal of Scripture you have to ignore to believe as you do. If you are satisfied to remain in your ignorance, I will be happy to leave you to it. The truth is, God predestined that I should be here to try to help you out of it.

    I don’t believe everything Calvinists teach in the broad sense of that term, but I do find agreement with them regarding soteriology. I have tested these things by the Scriptures. Perhaps you should do the same.

    And no, choice language (and I don’t find much even of that in Scripture) doesn’t imply ability.

    Like

  4. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on July 17, 2012 at 9:17 AM

    Argo,

    I didn’t say you are stupid. I said you are ignorant. That can be cured through study. You might want to begin by getting our position right. No true Calvinist says that sinners do not possess reason. If you can find one who says that, please give me the quotation.

    Like

  5. Argo's avatar Argo said, on July 17, 2012 at 9:50 AM

    Randy,

    You are right. I stand corrected. You did not say stupid. I misrepresented that. I apologize for inferring that those with whom I disagree are stupid in my last post. I shouldn’t have done that. That doesn’t give glory to God; sometimes my emotions get the better of me.

    I will find a quotation and document it for you. I don’t mean this in a contentious way, but I don’t think it will be too difficult.

    Like

  6. trust4himonly's avatar trust4himonly said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:37 AM

    So that means you then have that authority to do so? How do you know that you are predestined to do so based on getting me to see your Calvinist views? Is that what Christ would want you to do? I do not go on Calvinist sites to try to argue my side- it is fruitless. I guess I could say I feel that I was not predestined to.
    I believe in Christ Jesus as my Savior. I believe that I was a sinner destined for hell. I believe that Christ is God and was resurrected from the dead. I believe I am now eternally secure in Christ. I believe that I must tell others about Him and live for Him. I love Scripture and read it daily; praying that the Holy Spirit show me truth. And yes I would love to be called a Berean- they were people just like me. They were not perfect nor am I. All I am saying is I DO NOT have to run to Calvinism to get Scripture right and I do not agree at all with some of their teachings. I may not know every detail about Calvinism, but I do know this it confuses and so why in the world would I decide to run back to it?

    I don’t know maybe I am predestined not to.

    Anyway Randy you can win the argument if you want to I am just a woman and don’t have the authority according to some Calvinists. But that’s is fine with me because I am secure in where I stand in Christ. And I am sure if I did not get the predestined thing down it won’t send me to the eternal fire. Adieu my friend.

    Like

  7. Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on July 17, 2012 at 10:42 AM

    Having readers….delightful. Having smart readers….awesome. having readers who will deal with Randy for you….PRICELESS!!!!!

    Like

  8. JeffB's avatar JeffB said, on July 17, 2012 at 12:36 PM

    gracewriterrandy –

    Romans 8:7 means that the unsaved person can NOT choose to obey God’s law if he/she is not ABLE to be subject to it.

    Having said that, you are, of course, correct in your earlier point that we must deal with the text of Scripture, not with what we happen to think about certain ideas. For example, the words “election,” “elected,” etc., turn up over 25 times in Scripture. We can’t pretend that that isn’t so; we must find out what the words mean in the original language and in context.

    Argo –

    “Total Depravity” (and “Total Inability”) are unfortunately misleading terms. They do not mean that man is as bad, corrupt, helpless, and inept as he can possibly be; that would be UTTER depravity or corruption. They mean that our corruption because of our inherited sin nature has affected every part of our being – mind, body, emotion, will. The result is that we cannot do anything good as God defines “good.” (e.g. Rom. 3:9-18). I’m speaking of the “natural” man.

    Folks, criticize Calvinism as much as you want, but please criticize it only to the extent that it does not reflect Scripture. I, myself, think that it’s on very shaky Scriptural ground when it comes to infant baptism, and on no ground at all when it comes to what “Israel” means in the Bible. I think it’s on much firmer ground when it comes to election and atonement, as well as some other things. SOMETIMES CALVINISM IS MYSTERIOUS, PARADOXICAL, AND EVEN OFFENSIVE BECAUSE SCRIPTURE IS SOMETIMES THOSE THINGS. (For instance, the Bible speaks of the “offense of the cross.”) SOMETIMES CALVINISM IS MYSTERIOUS, PARADOXICAL, AND EVEN OFFENSIVE BECAUSE IT GETS SCRIPTURE WRONG. But I don’t think it’s accurate to say that it’s always wrong.

    It may be that Calvinism and/or “New Calvinism” is, at the least, confused and confusing about justification and sanctification, and, at worst, utterly mistaken about them. It’s certainly something worth investigating, in good faith. I know that it’s sometimes difficult to discuss these things without anger, but I think we should try to do so.

    Like

  9. Argo's avatar Argo said, on July 17, 2012 at 2:15 PM

    JeffB,

    Thanks for that even-keeled response.

    I see what you are saying…sometimes I write posts with the assumption that readers understand my familiarity with terms, and so I just plow forward. Let me explain my position better.

    With regard to total depravity. I understand the nuances of the semantics that Calvinists often employ to try to rationally justify their utterly contradictory conclusions. In my world, words mean things. Now, I understand that proponents of a particular orthodoxy diddle around with meanings so that the common understanding of the word no longer applies (this was one of Jonathan Edwards’ problems with Locke’s use of the word(s) “Will”, or “To Will”).

    So, as far as I’m concerned “total” means “total”. Total depravity implies much more than a “taint” of something. It implies that the person who is depraved in such a way is so far from God as to not even be considered in his right mind; to be so depraved they cannot even view reality well enough to render ANY judgement of it that isn’t “shot through with sin”, and therefore bereft of ANY truth. Indeed, this is exactly why CJ can get away with the kind of grotesque hypocrisy and bias he has in dealing with matters relating to his sin. His argument is that anyone “beneath” him is too depraved to even see his sin, let alone render a judgment of it. In short, the Calvinists say that you can never trust what your senses tell you BECAUSE you are totally depraved. This is not a biblical concept. If unbelievers (and believers) are responsible for their sin at the last judgment, then it must follow that they can know “good” and be able to act upon it. That is a fact. This is not some theological paradox. If you are to be justly judged, you must be declared culpable. The ONLY way you can be culpable is if doing the right thing is within your mental and physical capabilities. (Why command people to “repent and believe” if because of their sinful nature,they can do neither…is God really the God of logical fallacy? This isn’t a mystery like the Trinity or the resurrection of the dead.. This is about a JUST God versus a hypocritical one (meaning, demanding people do something and yet not give them the ability to do it.)

    However, being capable of “good” is not the same concept as not being able to earn one’s salvation by keeping the Law. I hold the latter to be axiomatic as a result of the Fall.

    Calvinism is wrong because they teach ideas that are not biblical.

    Like

  10. Argo's avatar Argo said, on July 17, 2012 at 3:24 PM

    JeffB,

    Please, I do not mean this to come across as bitter in tone, so please don’t take it that way.

    I remember CJ saying, and I quote, “Mother Theresa has more in common with Adolf Hilter than with Jesus Christ”. Now, in light of that statement, what do you think the Calvinists mean when they refer to “total depravity”?

    Like


Leave a reply to trust4himonly Cancel reply