Paul's Passing Thoughts

The New Calvinist Takeover of Southwood Presbyterian Church: Part 19; Bachman – Turner Overdrive

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on December 10, 2011

Cruising down the highway as a young man, I was feeling pretty good listening to my rock music on the awesome new technology that replaced 8-track tapes, cassettes. One of my preferred bands was Bachman-Turner Overdrive, and one of my favorite songs was “Taking Care Of Business.” Sure, I knew a particular statement in the lyrics made no sense at all; “We love to work at nothing all day,” but I really dug the song man, and at that time of my life, trust me, the tune was way more important than the truth.

Since I have been studying New Calvinism for nearly five years now, that song has constantly been triggered in my mind. As I was perusing Southwood’s blog this morning, stopping to read “Green Grass of Grace,” by Jean (pronounced “ Jon”) F. Larroux (don’t forget: “The Third” hereafter; “JL3”), I observed the opening sentence: “Grace is difficult. It is harder than trying harder.” Then it happened in my head:

“People see you having fun

Just a-lying in the sun

Tell them that you like it this way

It’s the work that we avoid

And we’re all self-employed

We love to work at nothing all day

And we be…

Taking care of business every day

Taking care of business every way

I’ve been taking care of business, it’s all mine

Taking care of business and working overtime.”

In another post, JL3 said, “I’m not arguing for NO EFFORT or WORK I am arguing for GREATER EFFORT and MORE DIFFICULT WORK, the work of humbling ourselves, being broken, repentant, prostrate before God, looking past our ‘symptomatic sins’ to their root causes and being faced with such horror over my depravity that I am left with no other options than Jesus” (not sure, but I think the comment was pulled down).

Tullian Tchividjian, JL3’s obvious mentor stated it this way in “The Tyranny of Accountability Groups”:

The bottom line is this, Christian: because of Christ’s work on your behalf, God does not dwell on your sin the way you do. So relax and rejoice…and you’ll actually start to get better. The irony, of course, is that it’s only when we stop obsessing over our own need to be holy and focus instead on the beauty of Christ’s holiness that we actually become more holy! Not to mention, we start to become a lot easier to live with!

Oh really? I would think that people who focus on Matthew 7:24 with the result of their life being built on a rock would be the ones easier to get along with. And of course, I am constantly told by New Calvinist hacks that for me to say that these kinds of statements insinuate that Jesus obeys for is “reading into their statements.” Whatever. We see four things in Tchividjian’s statement: 1; Christ has done the work of sanctification on our behalf (ie., sanctification’s work was part of the atonement). 2; Doing less results in being “better,” productivity for the sake of the kingdom is conspicuously absent—per the usual. 3; Holiness comes by focusing on Christ’s holiness and not our own, resulting in more holiness. And I am often accused of “reading  things into their statements” regarding the “Gospel Contemplationism” charge. Again, whatever. 4; The either/or communication technique, It’s either Christ’s holiness or our holiness, it can’t be both.

JL3 continues:

We are allergic to resting in the finished work of Christ and the hardest ‘trophy’ to lay down is that trophy of obedience I have been working for my whole life. To make the shift from an life driven by fear to a life motivated by love is very, very painful.

Notice that the finished work of Christ pertains to both justification and sanctification. Accuse me of reading into to this if you will, but what else can be surmised? Also, we gain see the either/or hermeneutic: we are either motivated by love or fear, it can’t be something else—it’s either/or. But the contradictions in JL3’s posts are too massive to document; for example, the Scriptures are clear that at times, God does motivate us by fear. Like all New Calvinists, JL3 validates love as something that is always (as stated by, of all people, John MacArthur) “always sweet, never bitter-sweet.” This removes the self-sacrifice aspect of love through obedience. And it brings us back to Bachman-Turner  Overdrive theology as well: they only worked hard at what they loved, which was doing nothing.

Most of us have obeyed because of fear of reprisal from God. To know that we are loved apart from our obedience or disobedience is a truth that is elusive. This is why it must be pounded into our souls week after week.

This is a bunch of boloney, and notice JL3’s New Calvinist us against them mentality. “Most” obey from fear? Anybody who does counseling knows that isn’t true—fear of God is never been more lacking in recent church history.

We have purposed to drive deep into those fields ripe with the green grass of the grace of God, not into the rocky crags of fundamentalism, legalism and pietism hoping that some nourishing shoot of grace will emerge every now and again. The sheep cannot be sustained on a sparse diet of occasional grace.

Either/or: it’s either grace, or rocky crags. Nuff said, like all New Calvinists, his whole realm of speech is fraught with deceptive communication techniques.

Everything in Christendom tells them to weave for themselves garments of obedience and performance to wear before the Great White Throne of Judgment as ‘jewels in their crown.’

This hearkens back to JL3’s ancestors of the Australian Forum (the cradle of New Calvinism) who mixed Reformed teachings with SDA investigative judgment theology. Christians fear no future judgment concerning our righteousness—the righteousness of God has already been accredited to our account in full.

This is fundamentally no different than Islam! The Gospel offers us freedom from our sin-stained hearts and our obedience-stained garments and bids us rest in the finished work of Christ which is better than us being better!!!’

So, obedience in Islam is no different than obedience in Christianity? Sure it is. Christian obedience is based on T-R-U-T-H. The fundamental difference between Christianity and all other religions is our God given love for truth (2Thess. 2:10), which translates into applying it to our life. Hence, “If you love me, keep my commandments.” You can’t separate love for the truth from wanting to learn more about it, and then making it part of you. We are promised blessings if we do that (James 1:25).

JL3’s  New Calvinistic teachings also has another tone shared by Bachman-Turner theology: the song demeaned people who supposedly wasted their life by doing things they didn’t like to do. New Calvinists often refer to our striving to obey as “rats on a treadmill” etc. Like MacArthur, we are told by JL3 that we should strive for a life that is “sweet, never bittersweet.” The fact is rather this: in pursuing truth, it will often collide with life, and other times  it will bring joy. But when the experience is “bittersweet,” that’s not works salvation, it’s called “self-sacrifice.”

The apostle John reminded us that the Lord’s commands are not “burdensome.” We need to be reminded of this, because his commands are truth, and we love the truth. Sometimes the truth is hard, and it calls for us to reject the tune in exchange for the truth. Whatever the tune may be, whether, “resting is better than being better,” or  a “love to work at nothing all day.”

paul

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Bill's avatar Bill said, on December 11, 2011 at 2:49 PM

    Paul,

    that point you make about self sacrifice and self giving is great. It’s a key to the Christian life. It’s following the Apostle Paul as he follows Christ, the Pioneer of our faith who went before. I also like what you quoted:

    “Nuff said, like all New Calvinists, his whole realm of speech is fraught with deceptive communication techniques. Everything in Christendom tells them to weave for themselves garments of obedience and performance to wear before the Great White Throne of Judgment as ‘jewels in their crown.”

    Interesting, right before that Matt 7:24 (On the Rock) that you mentioned Jesus said (v 21) that only he who “does the will of my Father in heaven” will enter the kingdom of heaven. The reality of the “great crash” that Jesus describes later is hidden from the New Calvinist sheepfold through “deceptive communication techniques.”

    Below I’ve copied another quote from that Southwood JL3’s website that is so deceptive. It’s the COG, outside of us, Justification/Sanctification all done for you on a platter, take life easy (Antinomian Theology 101):

    ABOUT US
    Our Theology: Some of our non-negotiables

    We believe both halves of the Gospel.

    “Many well-intentioned religious people believe that Jesus took care of their law-breaking on the cross, but they wake up daily with the mindset that law-keeping is something which they can accomplish with their pious behavior. Only Jesus was blameless and upright before God in every sense. We believe that Christ dealt with our law-breaking as well as our law-keeping! God requires that we be holy and the holiness he required Jesus earned on our behalf. In that sense the Gospel does have two halves: believing Jesus died for me AND believing that Jesus lived for me.”

    Isn’t that pathetic?

    Arkansas Bill

    Like

  2. Bill's avatar Bill said, on December 11, 2011 at 3:22 PM

    Here’s another, I thought, peculiar statement on the Southwood JL3 website:

    Our Theology: Some of our non-negotiables
    We are grace junkies.
    “Our understanding of grace flavors everything we do…. We don’t love grace because we are ‘good Christians’; we love grace because we are ‘wretched sinners’ who have been loved by God!”

    Notice “we are wretched sinners.” Are we to suppose that the world has wretched sinners and we are too? Is there no difference between Christians and the world? That’s the Christian Identity? That’s who I am? With regard to conduct, are there no righteous, holy, or good people mentioned in the Bible, NT or OT?

    Arkansas Bill

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on December 11, 2011 at 7:20 PM

      Bill,
      Yep, and I am constantly accused of launching “false accusations” against these people for claiming they teach the total depravity of the saints.. But yet, look at the statement you cite. What else came be surmised?

      Like

  3. gracewriterrandy's avatar gracewriterrandy said, on December 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM

    Paul,

    Perhaps it would serve you well to actually read a theological definition of “total depravity.” There is no evidence in any of those statements that they believe the saints are still “Totally Depraved.”

    Like

  4. Unknown's avatar HRW said, on December 17, 2011 at 7:31 PM

    By the way, Jean’s name is not pronounced Jon…think New Orleans style JJJEAHH, with only a HINT of an “n” at the end!

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on December 17, 2011 at 8:46 PM

      Yes, my wife the French/English major pronounced it for me. Alrighty then.

      Like

      • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on December 17, 2011 at 8:49 PM

        In regard to the correction JJJEAHH. I can do it now. Cool, I will use it if I ever have coffee with him.

        Like


Leave a comment