Paul's Passing Thoughts

Enablement: Words Don’t Always Mean What We Think They Mean to Others

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on October 14, 2011

My dear Paul asked if I would write my perspective on being enabled by the Holy Spirit. We are having differences of opinion on what enablement means.  I realize that my perspective will not be full of theological depth, proof texts, or biblical word analysis.  My perspective will come from a personal angle.

My first inclination is to say, “Yes.  The Holy Spirit enables us to do the will of the Father.” However, all the enablement was given to us at salvation. I must appropriate that enablement in order to accomplish the will of my heavenly Father.
Consider these examples:

a)     By strength man is enabled to work.

b)    Wealth enables men to be charitable or to live in luxury.

c)     The law enables us to dispose of our property by will.

d)    Learning and industry enable men to investigate the laws of nature.

The outside source, whether a person, event, or thing renders one capable or able to accomplish some task.  A person must act upon that enablement in order to accomplish the desired activity. Strength enables one to work, but if strength is not applied, work is not accomplished. The rope enables you to secure yourself when you climb the mountain.  The rope will not do the mountain climbing for you. You must use the enablement (rope) to accomplish the desired task (climbing the mountain).  The Holy Spirit supplies the enablement ( at salvation), the believer must appropriate the enablement in order to accomplish the will of the Father.  The enabler (Holy Spirit) is always there, the enablement  (strength, power, ability ) have already been provided, the believer appropriates it.

There is another consideration with enablement. In today’s society if one is labeled an enabler it connotes a negative and undesirable accusation. Consider this example:

Hi. My name is Susan and I am a recovering enabler.  Years ago I was confronted about being an enabler.  Not me.  I was a loving, caring, submissive Christian wife whose goal in marriage was to build up my husband with honor and respect. After all, we were going to serve the Lord together.  Our vows were taken from the book of Ruth: where you go I will go.  We lit the unity candle signifying to all who came to our wedding  that we were going to be one flesh, one mind, one heart.  I was a good Christian wife, not an enabler.  An enabler helps people continue in their addictions.  An enabler is a wimpy, floor mat of a wife who has no life of her own apart from her husband’s wishes and whims. That certainly was not Susan St. Denis! I was not an enabler.

My name is Susan and I am a recovering enabler.  Years ago I was confronted about my being an enabler. Yes, me.  I finally admitted it to myself ,to my pastor and to my closest friends. The counsel I received from my pastor was to keep trying to “fix” what was broken in my first  husband, Wayne.  I needed to show Wayne  that I needed him. I was to become a Total Christian  Woman, the perfect, submissive wife. In doing so  he would see that his addictions could not give him what I could provide. I was told by my pastors that I was not submissive enough and had a rebellious spirit and when I got right with the Lord, then my husband would follow suit.  Sadly, this “biblical” counsel given to me by my pastors only fueled his addictions and deepened my enablement. In my attempts at fixing, I also rescued, coached him when he tried recovery programs, nursed him back to health after being beat almost to death by his drug dealers, and was his cheerleader during the sober times. I was his bank, his bill payer, his bail bondsman, and the accountable one.   I was an enabler, a martyr, lost and wounded.  However, without me to help him he would have had to face the consequences of his actions and that might have interfered with his continued use.  I protected him from consequences and from himself.  Sadly, I enabled him to die an early death at the age of 55. Two years before his death, I stopped running interference for him, stopped  making excuses, and stopped shielding him from the consequences of his addictions. He died of congestive heart failure, and a diabetic coma all directly related to his alcohol addiction.  IF  I had not assumed the role of enabler would Wayne’s life have taken a different course?

When Paul asked me to write comments about the Holy Spirit being an enabler, I cringed. You can certainly see how this term bears many negative connotations for me, and to associate enabling to the work of the Holy Spirit evokes unpleasant thoughts.  I would rather think of the Holy Spirit as my helper as we co-labor together to grow in the wisdom and knowledge of the Lord. However, when I became a believer I was enabled by the Holy Spirit with the same power that resurrected our Lord from the dead.  I was rescued from hell, saved from the penalty of sin, redeemed by His blood, forgiven,  justified by faith, and empowered by the Holy Spirit  on that day I accepted Christ as my Lord and Savior.  The Holy Spirit’s enablement (being empowered) is a one time event. He does have a continual role in my life as His child. He convicts of sin, He is a helper, a comforter, a counselor, an advocate with the Father.

When I hear or read of someone who says that “the Holy Spirit enabled them to do thus and so” it makes me wonder, “In what way?”   Are they saying that the Holy Spirit shielded consequences so that the activity so desired can continue?  Are they saying the Holy Spirit smoothed things out so as to not to rock the boat?  Are they saying that the Holy Spirit provided financial assets so that choices can continue?     Knowing what the term enable means and all its ramifications, I encourage believers to use it with care.  Coming from my personal experience of 36 years of being an enabler, and how today’s world sees enablement, another biblical term would seem more appropriate to describe the work of the Holy Spirit.

My name is Susan and I am a recovering enabler.

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. lydia's avatar lydia said, on October 14, 2011 at 11:08 PM

    Oh my did I love this post. First of all, those pastors who told you to submit more should be confronted for malpractice!

    I bought into a lot of that stuff, too. But I also saw the devestation in such teaching and how it keeps men as little boys as we enable their sin. I saw so many marriages in total chaos over that sort of teaching…women as submissive enablers, hoping one day he woudl just wake up and become the spiritual leader. And these poor women went from conference to conference, book to book lapping up all the “rules” that would make him a godly man. It was all on her! The husband’s salvation and sanctification was measured by her submission and prayers! Talk about spiritual abuse.

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on October 15, 2011 at 8:04 AM

      Lydia,

      Husbands should be won over by the wife’s good behavior, but as you have pointed out–that can go way too far. I have seen both extremes. In fact, I was an elder in a Reformed church that put it all on the husband. I mean, practically: “If you were a better spiritual leader–your wife wouldn’t have put a contract out on your life.” I know one “pastor” who thinks it’s cute to take counselees to the bathroom to show them why there are problems in their/his home, and then makes them stand in front of one of the bathroom mirrors. This has also tempted me to repost an article about the Reformed craze of wives having their husbands brought up on church disciple for “lack of leadership.” As reported by a friend of this ministry; in one case, for watching too much football.

      This cuts both ways, but in Susan’s case, this problem was particularly tragic. She has read your comment and I am sure she will respond, but your description was pretty much word for word what she experienced. This kind of counsel not only threw her life into turmoil, but eventually ended in the death of her former husband. This is why I am so dedicated to INS and their balanced approach to counseling. But anyway, I look forward to Susan weighing in on this.

      Like


Leave a reply to paulspassingthoughts Cancel reply