Why “Lawless” Equals “Heartless”
Foul doctrine always has consequences. One of the many unfortunate consequences seen in the “Gospel-Driven Life” movement is the merciless, cold-blooded behavior of its leaders and followers. I have counseled spouses who have begged their partners not to divorce them because the marriage “doesn’t look like the gospel.” I have looked into begging eyes pleading for me to explain how “elders” could counsel people to do things that plainly contradict the literal, plain sense of Scripture. Apparently, their broken hearts just didn’t understand that all Scripture must be seen in its “gospel context.”
I have seen the hostile takeover of churches and listened to the many testimonies; for example, Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church where those who took over mercilessly trampled underfoot the memory and work of James D. Kennedy. Whether he was your cup of tea or not is beside the point. I used to attend an early morning Bible study with a group of men in which an “elder” of the Sonship variety attended. He had a reputation for being a very tender, loving, soft-spoken person. On more than one occasion, he shared his exasperation in regard to his terminally ill mother-in-law mourning the fact that she would not be around to see her grandchildren grow up. Stern-faced, he shared his disappointment that she was not rather rejoicing that she would soon be with the Lord. Apparently, she had a Grandchildren Idol.
I can’t help but to wonder if this is the result of GS’s devaluing of God’s law. Why do I say that? Well, observe what Christ said in Matthew, chapter four:
“At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.”
Recently, John MacArthur wrote a book entitled, “Slave” in which he presented the idea that a translation fraud has been perpetrated in the English Bible regarding the word slave. Even though his approach was passive (the book lacked the usual Mac life application), and more or less presented the picture minus detailed life application, he hasn’t been invited to a GS function since the book’s publication. Apparently, even the suggestion that we are in any way, shape, or form, slaves to Christ is more than the GS brain-trust can handle. Well, Mac needs to write another book about the same fraud being perpetrated in regard to the word translated “wickedness” (most translations, “iniquity”) in this passage. He might as well—he’s in the doghouse anyway.
The word is “anomia.” It’s “nomia” (law) with the particle “a” prefixed to it, or “anti-law.” It is were we get the English word, “antinomian.” Some translations have “lawlessness” or better yet, “without the law.” The idea is being a rejecter of God’s law, and has very little to do with governmental laws, if anything. Take note: in the latter days, love will “grow” cold BECAUSE of antinomianism. A cold heart doesn’t cause lawlessness—lawlessness CAUSES the heart to become cold. So much for, “ALL change is from the inside out” (of course, ANY real change is impossible without the indwelling Holy Spirit).
Will my theory hold water? “Because” is a conjunction showing cause—let’s look at a verse with a conjunction that shows contrast: “Their hearts are callous and unfeeling,
but I delight in your law” (Psalms 119:70). Hence, those who delight in God’s law are contrasted with those who don’t; the lawless have callous, unfeeling hearts. Also, the Psalmist didn’t just ask God for compassion, curiously, he asked God’s compassion as found in His law: “Your compassion is great, O LORD; preserve my life according to your laws” (Psalms 119:156).
A movement that devalues God’s law—what’s that look like? It looks like Sonship and Gospel Sanctification: merciless, cold, and uncompassionate.
paul

Oh yeah, the connection fits. We want to go to the “home of righteousness” where hearts of love do not grow cold.
Romans 1 has the progression, bad to worse, lawless to heartless:
“For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but in their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened…they are senseless, faithless, heartless…”
Interesting, notice how things fit together and are related to each other.
Christ, law, love, and freedom fit together like a hand shake; their friends!
“His command is that you walk in love” and “walk in obedience to His commands.”
The law of Christ is a law of love. Righteousness is the uprightness of divine love. “This is love for God: to obey his commands.” The law that Christ gives is “the perfect law that gives freedom.”
In contrast:
Sin is a contradiction to the law and love of Christ. Since He’s the one who gives freedom, sin is the hate of freedom. “Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact sin is lawlessness.” Therefore, lawlessness is bondage and hate of Christ too.
Cypher on that.
Arkansas Bill
LikeLike
From the previous comment a great application is apparent. Since there is unity between love, law, obedience, and freedom throughout Scripture, it has meaning for our Christian world view and practice. The Apostle Paul says faith, hope, and love will remain (1Cor 13:13). But the greatest is love. God’s love has been poured into our hearts (infused into the inner man) by the Holy Spirit (Rom 5:5). Since love for God is “to obey his commands (1Jn 5:3),” we know our competency to obey comes from God. So we fix our eyes on Jesus (exalted because he “loved righteousness and hated wickedness”) and imitate him knowing we can ACTUALLY DO RIGHTEOUS THINGS because we ACTUALLY LOVE with the love God gives.
The teachings of GS/Sonship are in contradiction to these facts. To be consistent, their Justification model that maintains a “declared righteousness only” should also maintain a “declared love only.” Following the logic, obedience should be “declared only,” and since obedience comes from a source called faith (Rom 1:5), then faith should be “declared only” as well. Second thought, maybe that’s what GS/Sonship is trying to say (declared only holiness; total depravity of the saints)? They insist on looking ONLY to Jesus, because the actual of anything is only with Him. The saints, being devoid of competency disqualifies our looking to them for an example. After all, they are only “declared saints,” not actual.
Arkansas Bill
LikeLike