Some Passing Thoughts on Obedience and Sanctification
I miss being able to post daily as I am very busy right now, and am also trying to complete part 3 of a previous post. However, I appreciate comments / questions that come in that enable me to launch from a pre-established basis, affording the time to write a post that I wouldn’t ordinarily have. So, the question and my answer will be the post for today:
“Are we able to know by what means he [the Holy Spirit] helps and enables believers? Specifically, is there a way a believer can somehow avail themselves of the HS’s help to love or otherwise obey? If so, how does one do that?”
It’s many faceted, but it boils down to obedience. By what means? And how? Answer: obey. No matter how passive one’s view of sanctification is, you always have to do something; and trust me, knowing us, no matter how minuet it is, we will have to eventually do it whether we feel like it or not. Even if you buy into Piper’s theology that we will do it because it is our delight, our tendency is to always want to be delighted, so we will have to obey and go to work (or something our wife has wanted us to do, for like, 5 years) instead of reading our Bible all day long as a way of “beholding as a way of becoming” (Let me just stop here and share: nobody annoys me more than John Piper).
Ok, get ready to be really offended. But after I say what I am going to say to answer your above question, let me also say that I am in good company and will quote RC Sproul from his book “Pleasing God” to dampen some of the indignation. Here we go: the Holy Spirit helps those who help themselves. O my, anymore, you say that to people and the blood vessels start popping out in their necks. However, I would probably rather state it this way: the HS manifests His power as we walk according to truth. All in all, I think your question is best answered by James in 1:25 – blessings are IN (a preposition explaining where) the DOING.
Well, at the very least, let me be burned at the stake with RC Sproul: “Sanctification is cooperative. There are two partners involved in the work. I must work and God will work. If ever the extra-biblical maxim, “God helps those who help themselves,” had any truth, it is at this point” (“Pleasing God” p. 227).
I heard something amazing from Rush Limbaugh the other day. The Russians supposedly prove to their school children that there is no God by presenting two potted plants; they then tell the children to water one on a regular basis, but only pray for the other plant’s growth. While one should not be surprised that such reasoning comes from reprobate minds, at least such a test recognizes that the one plant will surely die without water, unlike many of the sanctification paradigms of our day.
I don’t think anybody explains this better than the apostle Paul in 1Corintians 3: 5-9;
“What, after all, is Apollos? And what is Paul? Only servants, through whom you came to believe—as the Lord has assigned to each his task. I planted the seed, Apollos watered it, but God has been making it grow. So neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but only God, who makes things grow. The one who plants and the one who waters have one purpose, and they will each be rewarded according to their own labor. For we are co-workers in God’s service; you are God’s field, God’s building.”
paul

If folks get offended bc a glib truism is being contradicted – whether they want God to help those helping themselves or they don’t – their own unhappiness is itself presumptuously vague. Folks need to get past what I call the glibbery. U explained yourself so well that those who disagree won’t do so bc u have eliminated the role of the HS, but only bc they want to eliminate the human role altogether. But for the prevalence of this monewrgism in the national culture of late, your point ought to be viewed as rather pedestrian. The syndicated radio station Klove, which is on in most decent sizEd markets, not only plays the pop tunes supporting the monergistic GS view u constantly decry, but their DJs are spouting off quips from “Crazy LoveL to argue that no one should be worrying that they are feeling conviction for not measuring up, even when they don’t. Tw
Ps I’m surprised u think I’m a monergist after all the pixels I’ve excited on your blogM. Don’t u read the comments carefully? My only beef with u is the extent tro which your rhetoric at times triea rto tie up the HS in a shoebox wqithout showing the Biblical warrant for that soft shoe sidestep which your theological constructs demand. Those presuppositions are neither necessary to maintain your synergistic view nor even remotely suggested in Scripture. So, to that extent. U r promoting traditions of men over the clear pronouncementgs about the 5pirit in the Word. Tw, again
LikeLike
TW
No, I don’t think that about you. Not sure what I wrote to make you think that, but I don’t.
paul
LikeLike