Paul's Passing Thoughts

Horton’s Systematic Theology Adds To The Sonship/Gospel Sanctification Massive Subculture: Revised

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on May 30, 2014

[NOTE: This was written before I discovered that New Calvinism is in fact the same gospel that the Reformers taught. The resurgence movement began as COG in 1970, became Sonship circa 1986, Gospel Transformation in 2000, dubbed Gospel Sanctification by detractors in 2007, and finally New Calvinism in 2008. This was also written before I understood that orthodoxy is a part of spiritual caste in general]. 

“Gospel Sanctification,  as Sonship is now called, will begin to totally rewrite orthodox Christianity”  [Note also that I no longer equate “orthodoxy ” with truth per se].

[Further revision: much has been learned since this post, but the general idea is very accurate: the Neo-Calvinist movement is seeking to develop a subculture within American culture that will eventually, if all goes as planned, devour American culture as we know it. This is part and parcel with Calvinism’s dominion theology. This post submits a sketchy framework of useful categories under the general idea. For instance, one college that focuses strictly on the Neo-Calvinist vision is a far cry from the fact that this movement owns (in an intellectual capacity) most of the seminaries in America. Other categories could be added as well, e.g., Christian publishing ].   

The Fix is now in. The false doctrine of the centrality of the objective gospel (COG) which found new life in  Sonship Theology about thirty years ago—now has its own theology, hermeneutic, practical application, defined experience, ecumenical (inclusiveness) movement, history, college, counseling organization, missionary organization, Bible—and now, its own systematic theology. Gospel Sanctification (GS), as Sonship is now called, will begin to totally rewrite orthodox Christianity. It won’t be long; those who we minister to will have to be deprogrammed before we can help them, starting with convincing them that the Bible is to be taken as literal instruction from God as our authority for ministry and life. Not understanding GS beforehand will make any attempt to help people with the word of God—dead on arrival.

GS Theology

The movement started with a very powerful concept in the minds of its perpetrators. Supposedly, we grow spiritually by revisiting the gospel that saved us every day. Proponents were convinced (and still are) that this thesis stands alone as truth; therefore, all other propositions must bow to it.

The GS Hermeneutic

A literal interpretation of Scripture will continually contradict GS. So, the proponents have changed how we read/ interpret the Bible accordingly. The GS hermeneutic is an interpretive prism that will always yield results that make GS plausible. Unlike the rest of the elements (which are very contemporary), the hermeneutic (known as Biblical Theology or Redemptive-Historical hermeneutics) was borrowed from times past. It originated in Germany under the liberal teaching and writings of Johann Philipp Gabler (1753-1826), who emphasized the historical nature of the Bible over against a “dogmatic” interpretation thereof. Nearly a century later, Geerhardus Vos (1862-1949) was instrumental in taking the discipline of biblical theology in a, supposedly, more conservative direction. Graeme Goldsworthy tweaked the doctrine to facilitate COG, and today, Goldsworthy’s “Trilogy” is the pillar of interpretation within the movement.

Practical Application

The GS narrow approach to sanctification must be embellished and applicable to life in some way in order to be sold. This is Heart Theology, and was developed through David Powlison’s Dynamics of Biblical Change at Westminster Seminary. In 1996, two former students of Powlison articulated Heart Theology in a book entitled, “How People Change.”

Defined Experience

John Piper seeks to articulate how Sonship is experienced via Christian Hedonism. Because GS makes our works and the work of the Spirit an either/or issue, someone needed to develop a thesis that explained how the difference can be ascertained. John Piper answered the call with the development of Christian Hedonism.

Ecumenical Bent

GS now encompasses any group that agrees with its primary view of plenary monergism and the synthesis of justification and sanctification. All other disciplines are seen as secondary and irrelevant to fellowship and joint ventures. The Gospel Coalition (holding national conferences on odd years, 2011, etc.), and T4G (Together For The Gospel, holding national conferences on even years) work together to promote GS/S while promoting inclusiveness among denominations and religions.

History

GS proponents claim a historical precedent dating back to Creation, and also claim to be the second part of the first Reformation. Of course, this is laughable. Sonship, the Antioch school, TGC, T4G, NCT, CH, and HT have no historical precedent prior to 1970. Many of the notable proponents of GS are associated in some way with the father of  Sonship Theology, Dr. John “Jack” Miller. Tim Keller and David Powlison were followers of Miller. Paul Tripp and Timothy Lane are followers of David Powlison. Jerry Bridges attributes his view of the gospel to Miller as well.

College

The Antioch School of leadership training has GS as its foundation and basis for training. It is located in Ames, Iowa.

Counseling Organization

The upstart Biblical Counseling Coalition, which seeks to network other counseling organizations as well, is intimately associated with T4G and The Gospel Coalition. The who’s who of Gospel Sanctification sit on its governing board including David Powlison and Paul David Tripp.

Missionary Organization

It’s primary missionary organization was founded by the father of Gospel Sanctification / Sonship—Dr. John “Jack” Miller. Banner of Truth states the  following in The Movement Called Sonship: “Miller encouraged New Life Presbyterian Church into originating the ‘World Harvest Mission’, a non-denominational missionary organization. Sonship became its main teaching vehicle.”

Bible

The English Standard Version (ESV) was first published by Crossway in 2001. Its vice president of editorial is Justin Taylor who also authors The Gospel Coalition Blog, the multimedia propaganda machine for GS doctrine. One of the translators was Wayne Grudem, also well known as a major proponent of GS doctrine. The ESV’s GS connection has made it the most purchased English Bible in the past ten years. The latest promotion of the ESV by Crossway, “Trusted: Trusted Legacy [a whopping ten years]; trusted By Leaders; Trusted For Life,” features an endorsement by the who’s who of  GS doctrine.

The Complete Fix

With Michael Horton’s recent publication of “The Christian Faith: A Systematic Theology for Pilgrims On the Way” (2011), the total fix is in place. The GS machine will now begin to move forward—rewriting and re-forming orthodox Christianity. I confidently predict that Horton’s book will be widely used in seminaries nationwide. Seminary students will be pumped into the local churches with a skewered view of truth—but using all of the same terminology that was formally orthodox.

What Can Be Done?

This doctrine thrives on the fact that Christians are theologically dumbed-down. If most Christians do not know the difference between justification and sanctification (and they don’t), they are helpless against this false doctrine. If most Christians don’t realize the importance of understanding hermeneutics (and they don’t), they are even more helpless. Local churches need to start in-doctrineating their people.

paul

An Answer for Child Abuse in the Church: Bikers Against Child Abuse

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on May 27, 2014

Since the church can’t it done on the issue of child abuse, let’s try BACA–they get it done and stand with the victim.

bacaworld.org

baca 1

Lying About Tchividjian: Exhibit A; John Piper and “Infused Grace”

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on May 26, 2014

The Gospel Coalition has parted ways with Tullian Tchividjian because he doesn’t have enough veiled honesty about John Calvin’s antinomianism. Like Calvin, and especially Luther, Tullian doesn’t have any use for the law save its ability to show us how wretched we are, and that is making the herd uneasy. Tchividjian continually puts the Calvinist cartel in a position of calming the herd.

Keep in mind that while Kevin DeYoung is out there calming the herd by talking about sanctification in a justification way, and frankly, telling dog-faced lies, John Piper and the Reformed issue of infused grace lurks in the background. What is it?

Basically, according to the elder statesman of Neo-Calvinism, whom no one will lay a hand on, the primary difference between Rome and Evangelicalism, and the very crux of the Reformation, is the issue of infused grace. Infused grace, what Rome is guilty of according to Calvinists, is the idea that there is goodness in the believer INCLUDING the very works of Christ. So, this view not only has a problem with goodness (infused grace) being inside the believer, this view even has a problem with the idea that Christ works within us! ALL righteousness is outside of the believer. This is Luther’s alien righteousness; sound familiar?

No matter how good Kevin DeYoung sounds in proffering obedientism in sanctification—keep in mind that this is what he really believes. That is why he and the whole lot are a bunch of stinking liars. Again, their problem with Tchividjian is that he is telling like it is about the true Reformed gospel.

“But Paul, how in the world does that supposedly work in real life?” I explain it in “Pictures of Calvinism,” but I will reiterate it here. Yes, yes, I understand that they talk about “Christ in us” and “us in Christ” and the “vital union,” but they by no means mean what they say with those words. ALL of that is…By faith…, and now we must discuss what their definition of faith is. Faith is like an eye that only sees outward, and is able to experience righteousness, but not participate in it. It’s like standing in the rain: you feel the rain, you experience the rain, but you have no control over the rain, the rain is something that is done to you, but you don’t do anything to the rain. If you could do anything to the rain, well, that means you can create righteousness.

Another way this is stated is, “heart change.” That doesn’t mean we actually change. “Heart change” is a changed capacity, or increased capacity to experience “vivification.” Mortification and vivification is a Reformed doctrine that defines sanctification as a perpetual death and rebirth that increases our capacity to experience in part the actual glorification that we will experience when we are resurrected.

Mortification, a deeper and deeper understanding of our need for grace via meditating on our depravity as exposed in the Bible, leads to death, and a subsequent resurrection/rebirth. This is what the Reformed mean by, “living by the gospel.” It is a perpetual death and resurrection, or “living by the cross.” It fuses justification, sanctification, and glorification together into a progressive experience culminated by full glory. Spiritual growth is defined by an increased capacity to experience the joy of our future glory.

Vivification

In covering for the mess that Tchividjian makes with his honesty, the Calvinist cartel dances around all of this by redefining ALL of the known terms and adding many.

My case for this is thoroughly documented in Pictures of Calvinism and It’s Not About Election. The ebooks are below.

Pictures of Calvinism

It’s Not About Election ebook

Progressive Justification: It’s Life Application 

 

 

Tchividjian Booted from The Gospel Coalition for Being Too Concise

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on May 21, 2014

ppt-jpeg4“Tullian Tchividjian is John Calvin. Period.”   

Be sure of this: Tullian Tchividjian thoroughly understands Reformed doctrine and its gospel. Tchividjian doesn’t believe one whit different from anybody who writes or speaks for The Gospel Coalition, and they ALL know it.

The problem with TT is that he does not follow the philosopher king script of nuance for the sake of the totally depraved herd that is “not ready” for the true Reformed gospel of justification by faith…plus the dirty little secret of faith alone for both justification and sanctification. It’s like total depravity this, and total depravity that, and “oh, we forgot to mention that includes the saints as well.”

TT is not nuanced enough. In this interview here, it is absolutely clear that this is the reason he was sent packing. Because of him, The Gospel Coalition, T4G, and others have to recruit sanctification gurus Jerry Wragg, Kevin DeYoung, and Mike Fabarez to cleanup his mess and calm the mindless totally depraved zombie sheep. They are tired of cleaning up the messiness of questions raised as a result of TT’s accurate articulation of the Reformed gospel.

There is only one thing better than a rank antinomian, an honest one. Charles Spurgeon once said that Calvinism isn’t a nickname, Calvinism is the gospel. Let me take that a step further for our purposes: Tullian Tchividjian is John Calvin. Period. I will debate anyone out there who has a problem with TT’s Calvinism  and will show clearly from the Institutes that TT is spot on. Get over it. Please debate me on this, you will lose.

In my disdain for the Neo-Calvinist movement, a weird respect is floating to the top for the few who know what Calvin really believed and are honest about it. In fact, who else is there other than TT and Joseph Prince? (see here for explanation). How bad is it when I have to admit that I respect these guys because A, they know what they are talking about, and B, they are honest about it? Prince’s life application is beside the point, he understands the Reformed version of justification by faith, and the rest of the story mostly untold.

The two other camps annoy me to no end: those who think  there is a difference between New Calvinism and Old Calvinism, and for that matter, Sonship theology as well, and those who know grade-A-well that there is no difference and are lying about it. I have also lost all patience with those who think they can help the spiritually abused while retaining some supposedly respectable remnant of Reformed theology. Name one aspect that passes a grammatical interpretation of Scripture: it’s not there.

So there it is. TT is very important to this ministry because people have to know what they believe before you can convince them. We think followers of TT know what they believe. The rest? It’s really just a massively confused personality cult with a plethora of discernment bloggers adding to the confusion by dissecting all of the symptoms.

Get with the program: it’s either Tullian or something else.

paul

 

 

“< Tweet, Tweet

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on April 29, 2014