Why New Calvinists Annoy Me
PPT nor TCANC are platforms to discuss the truth with New Calvinists. They have had their chance. I discussed my thesis with them for four years and their arguments were found wanting (when they weren’t personal attacks, which were rare). But this comment by a self-proclaimed Newbie is indicative of why they annoy me so much:
“Paul, I am what you would call a new Calvinist. I happen to be 52 years old. Your critique above simply isn’t true on several points. For example, you wrote that we “believe justification and sanctification are the same thing.” That’s not even close to being a true statement.”
“….not even close”? Um, excuse me, but isn’t their slogan, “The same gospel that saved us also sanctifies us,” and: “We must preach the gospel to ourselves every day”?
So annoying. First, per the usual, note his profound two-point argument:
- That’s all wrong.
- Not even close to being right.
Second, I’m “not even close,” but yet, note the word “SAME” in their own mantra continually espoused day and night.
It’s just annoying.
paul
Why New Calvinism Must be Destroyed: Part 1; The Larroux Mega-Lie
“The carnage left behind by this doctrine has been bulldozed into landfills long enough.”
“The Southwood parishioners only plead to be taught how to do that, but instead are scolded for clinging to the hope that we are not helpless in the sanctification process—that we can seize upon the promises of God by following him.”
A series by Paul and Susan Dohse
This will begin a new series on Southwood Presbyterian Church. I have perused the website that parishioners have constructed and received some messages as well. The picture is so graphic that I am compelled to go ahead and get this series started. It is a picture of why New Calvinism must be destroyed. I use that word, “destroyed” because that is the word that the apostle Paul used:
2 Corinthians 10:5
We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ,
More information is coming out and there is much to write about, and Lord willing, I will because this situation is New Calvinism in action. The carnage left behind by this doctrine has been bulldozed into landfills long enough. The series will examine the fact that Larroux, like most New Calvinist pastors, is a classic antinomian. It will also discuss why the movement is spreading unabated, and what must be done to stop it. Happenings at Southwood are the why. Susan and I will also examine what the Presbytery could have done to stop the situation and enquire as to why they didn’t.
One thing becomes evident from the letters posted on Southwood info .com and examination of the sermon archives; like all New Calvinist pastors, Larroux incessantly presents the motif that all of human history continues to be awash in mankind’s attempts to please God by working hard. So called, “legalism,” a word that does not appear anywhere in the Scriptures. First, the Pharisees of the New Testament were antinomians; Christ said Himself that they were “lawless” on the inside and the outside, not just the outside. And legalism was hardly the problem in the Old Testament, and Satan certainly didn’t come to Eve as a legalist. Furthermore, the problem at Corinth was hardly “legalism” as well.
Moreover, the Whitney Houston funeral is indicative of the real problem: freebie grace on steroids. For more than a year, Larroux has insulted the intelligence of Southwood parishioners by proclaiming the mega-lie that the whole world lies in the lap of legalism and that he is the great one that has come to set them free. The truth of the matter is that the whole world already lies in the lap of what he teaches at Southwood weekly. The cries heard in the Southwood letters only plead for one of the apostle Paul’s definitions of sanctification:
1 Thessalonians 4:4
that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor,
The Southwood parishioners only plead to be taught how to do that, but instead are scolded for clinging to the hope that we are not helpless in the sanctification process—that we can seize upon the promises of God by following him. But no, instead, they hear that Christian walk Christianity denies the cross. In essence, Larroux wants Southwood to become postmodern and stop believing that words mean things.
And no doubt, one of the goals of this series is to find out who the Presbyterian cowards are who have turned their back on these dear people. These people don’t even know me, but yet, I receive messages that are concerned for my own spiritual wellbeing in the midst of discernment ministry. These godly, loving people deserve better. When the information has been compiled, maybe a “PPT’s Top Ten Presbyterian Cowards” is in order.
paul
TRUTH is still important to some: PPT’s Top Ten Truth Warriors
10.5 Richard Barcellos
Contribution: “In Defense of the Decalogue.” Confronts New Covenant Theology.
Denomination: Reformed Baptist
Ministry association with Tom Ascol.
10. Sam Waldron
Contribution: Contends against New Covenant Theology.
Denomination: Reformed Baptist
Ministry association with Tom Ascol.
9. Mike Fabarez
Contribution: Aggressive Sanctification blog. Church has strong view of exegesis/(8) distinctives.
Denomination: Non-Denominational
Has at least one New Calvinist elder on staff, but in his defense, I don’t think he is aware of it.
8. Chad VanDixhoorn
Contribution: Wrote a notable treatise against Sonship Theology when most were asleep at the switch.
Denomination: Presbyterian
7. Timothy F. Kauffman
Contribution: Trinity Review; Jan-Mar 2012 Sanctification, Half Full: The Myopic Hermeneutic of the “Grace” Movement (Maybe the best article ever written on the subject).
Denomination: Presbyterian
6. Jason Hood
Contribution: Writings against sanctification by justification/Gospel Sanctification
Denomination: United Methodist
5. Terry Johnson
Contribution: Strongly opposes Sonship Theology. Seems to care more about the truth than keeping friends.
Denomination: Presbyterian
4. Dr. Peter Masters
Contribution: Has been very outspoken against New Calvinism specifically and names the names.
Denomination: Calvinistic Baptist
3. Cynthia Kunsman
Contribution: Spiritual abuse/cult specialist. Researches theological movements. Under Much Grace blog
Denomination: Non-Denominational Evangelical Reformed
2. Donn Arms
Contribution: Director of the Institute for Nouthetic Studies. Gatekeeper of the truly orthodox “first generation of biblical counseling.”
Denomination: Calvinistic Baptist
1. Dr. Jay E. Adams
Contributions: “Biblical Sonship: An Evaluation of the Sonship Discipleship Course.” Opponent of Gospel Sanctification and author of the INS Gospel Sanctification archives. Author of over 100 books on the subject of sanctification.
Denomination: Presbyterian
2012 PPT’s Top Ten Heretics of Our Day
10. Ligon Duncan
Heresy: Sonship Theology
Denomination: Presbyterian
9. Paul Washer
Heresy: Gospel Sanctification
Denomination: Southern Baptist
8. Al Mohler
Heresy: Gospel Sanctification
Denomination: Southern Baptist
7. CJ Mahaney
Heresy: Gospel Sanctification
Denomination: Reformed Charismatic
6. David Powlison
Heresy: Sonship Theology
Denomination: Presbyterian
5. Elyse Fitzpatrick
Heresy: Antinomianism, Gospel Sanctification
Denomination: Reformed Evangelical
4. Michael Horton
Heresy: Progressive Adventism, Antinomianism, Gospel Contemplationism
Denomination: United Reformed
3. John Piper
Heresy: Progressive Adventism, Antinomianism, Gospel Contemplationism
Denomination: Reformed Baptist
2. Tullian Tchividjian
Heresy: Hyper-Antinomianism, Gospel Sanctification, Gospel Contemplationism
Denomination: Presbyterian
1. Tim Keller
Heresy: Contemplative Spirituality, Spiritual Mysticism, Gospel Contemplationism, Sonship Theology
Denomination: Presbyterian
Paul Washer’s Objective Gateway to Infinite Subjectivity and Ambiguity
The Gospel Coalition has a sub-website called the “Objective Gospel.” Sound familiar? Does it remind you of “the centrality of the objective gospel”? That was the Australian Forum’s core doctrine, and Robert Brinsmead claims that the doctrine was original with them as far as being rediscovered truth from the original Reformation.
One of the tenets of the Forum was the idea that knowledge about the gospel of justification was infinite because it is about the person of Jesus Christ and not data. By the way, this is also the position of the Emergent Church that New Calvinists pretend to be against. It starts with the objective idea that the Bible is about justification only, but then proceeds to say that knowledge of it is infinite—clearly paving the way to teach anything they want to; such as, the total depravity of the saints, the scream of the damned, repentance from good works, etc.























1 comment