Paul Washer’s Objective Gateway to Infinite Subjectivity and Ambiguity
The Gospel Coalition has a sub-website called the “Objective Gospel.” Sound familiar? Does it remind you of “the centrality of the objective gospel”? That was the Australian Forum’s core doctrine, and Robert Brinsmead claims that the doctrine was original with them as far as being rediscovered truth from the original Reformation.
One of the tenets of the Forum was the idea that knowledge about the gospel of justification was infinite because it is about the person of Jesus Christ and not data. By the way, this is also the position of the Emergent Church that New Calvinists pretend to be against. It starts with the objective idea that the Bible is about justification only, but then proceeds to say that knowledge of it is infinite—clearly paving the way to teach anything they want to; such as, the total depravity of the saints, the scream of the damned, repentance from good works, etc.
Notice also that the name of the video is “rediscovering the gospel.”
New Calvinism and Our Children
PPT is just really swamped right now. I’m talking about information overload because the New Calvinists are not even being ambiguous anymore. No, I haven’t had time to read everything on the Southwood site, but a member there emailed me to ask the following (paraphrase): “Don’t know how you do it, but anyway, if you haven’t had any time to visit the site, you may want to at least focus on the following letter….”
So I did, which invoked the title of this post. I will address the letter as we go:
To the Ruling Elders of Southwood:
On September 4, 2011, our daughter and her family from Atlanta were here and we attended the Sunday worship at Southwood. After the service, our 13 year old granddaughter, who is well grounded in scripture, stated that she was very confused by the message. She had come away hearing that every good thing she does is wrong. Why would she believe that? We have gone back and listened again to that message, entitled “Duh,” and here is what we found.
First, I commend the couple who wrote this letter. Thank God for them. Let me just frame this according to what is going on in my neck of the woods. Susan and I live in GARB territory near Cedarville Christian College. Yesterday, they hosted a conference featuring the heretical New Calvinist Mark Devers and his 9Marks “ministry.” Packed house. I couldn’t even get in to report on the conference, and I didn’t wait till the last minute either. I will be going to a GARB conference in a couple of weeks that I got a ticket for , and many of the speakers are staff members at Skyview Ranch, a GARB youth camp. Long story short, it’s obvious that the Skyview staff is totally in the tank for New Calvinism. So, multiply the experience of the aforementioned thirteen year old times hundreds during the summer, and of course, everybody is asleep at the switch plus clueless. New Calvinism is either indoctrinating or confusing a whole generation of Christian youth.
They letter continues….
The message is from Galatians 3:1-6. Paul is chastening the church for falling prey to the persuasion of the Judaizers, exhorting them again that God’s love for them was not by any of their own works but through the miraculous work of Christ and the Holy Spirit. Jean seems to take the written word beyond its intent. He subtly changes ‘God’s love’ to ‘God’s favor.’ He changes legalism to performance. He takes Jewish law and extends it to almost any action one does. Here are some paraphrased quotes from the sermon. “To keep God’s favor, the Galatians were believing they needed Christ and a dash of obedience which looks like those things called Christian disciplines. Christian walk Christianity is from the Devil. Faithfulness is feeling condemned for work you haven’t finished (as contrasted with faith: resting completely in Christ). Faith is a litmus test for teachers and leaders; the difference between faith in Christ alone and faithfulness is like the difference between truth and falsehood, between Heaven and Hell. Faith alone is all we will teach.” (Here Jean says this is what Paul is teaching but he gives no supporting scriptures to support his interpretation.) “Discern as false any book, sermon, or Bible study where you hear a dash of self justifying obedience. Self justifying obedience is from Satan.”
Southwood Presbyterian Church has been putting up with this for more than a year now. It’s plainly sanctification by faith alone and fuses justification and sanctification together. Therefore, anything you do in sanctification effects justification. Without the New Calvinist formula for tiptoeing through sanctification in a way that won’t affect our justification, we are putting “our souls in peril” according to New Calvinists like John Piper. In essence, doing nothing to keep our salvation, which by the way, is still works salvation
Jean’s statements, combined with the tone and inflections in his delivery, imply that he is scornful of Christian disciplines, preachers, Christian writers, the Christian walk, obedience, faithfulness, good works, and an individual’s efforts. This message can lead to the conclusion that everything we do is evil and, by extension, that God and the Holy Spirit can do nothing through us. The message lacks balance and leaves sanctification out of the equation. A new believer under this teaching would be moribund after accepting Christ, hidebound in fear that he can do nothing right. While it is true none of us have all pure motives, it is also true that God commands us to go forward and that the Holy Spirit will be with us. God says we are His instruments for spreading the Truth. We cannot do this if we are strapped by guilt; we can do this if we seek partnership with the Holy Spirit.
I am going to focus on the key observations of this paragraph:
- “The message lacks balance and leaves sanctification out of the equation [yes, said another way: it fuses the two together and for all practical purposes eliminates sanctification].”
- “A new believer under this teaching would be moribund after accepting Christ, hidebound in fear that he can do nothing right [exactly, because if you do something wrong, it could cost you your salvation! Is this the kind of stuff we want taught to our children?!].”
From here Jean goes back to Paul saying “…since you were 100% depraved when you were brought into the Kingdom by the Holy spirit and by no works of your own, why are you trying to be perfected by your own human efforts? You are being deceived by the Devil.” I believe Jean is paralleling Paul in this. Jean then goes on to “We are like alcoholics ; we use Bible study, prayers, small groups, etc. as a crutch and the church rewards our ‘addiction’ with its approval. How would you know if you were addicted? Stop everything. If you feel anxiety, then you are afraid of leaving your ‘fix.’” So we ask: what does God have us do? Jean’s answer is “rest totally in Jesus.” So in turn we ask, what does Scripture say about resting totally in Jesus? But we hear no clear answer from the pulpit.
- “From here Jean goes back to Paul saying “…since you were 100% depraved ….” [nothing new here, this is the total depravity of the saints taught by New Calvinists].
- “….when you were brought into the Kingdom by the Holy spirit and by no works of your own, why are you trying to be perfected by your own human efforts? You are being deceived by the Devil”
I’m not going to bracket this point because it is an important one. New Calvinists often do this, they cite justification verses to make points concerning sanctification, making them the same. One of the verses they use most to do that is this one in particular, Galatians 3:2,3:
Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?
This verse concerns justification (the preceding verses make that absolutely clear), and “being perfected” really doesn’t properly represent Paul’s idea. That’s why Young’s Literal Translation states it this way:
so thoughtless are ye! having begun in the Spirit, now in the flesh do ye end?
This actually matches Romans 8:30 which shows that justification guarantees glorification. Paul is asking the Galatians a rhetorical question: “Are you going to be glorified (in the end) by the flesh?”
I couldn’t conclude this post with a better statement than concluded the letter to Southwood’s session. Please read it carefully:
We believe It is unfair to critique one sermon and disparage it as unbalanced. However, this same, or very similar, message has been preached throughout 2011. Please do not tell us weekly how ‘messy’ we are. We need occasional reminding but guide us in our sanctification and in our understanding of the whole breadth of the Word of God. Balance from the whole word of God is needed! And consider the youth, like our granddaughter. They have urgent needs to move on to solid food too, as they come into adulthood.
Indeed, take the inventory here. What New Calvinists are doing to adult Christians is bad enough, but what about our children?
paul
“Pastor” Mark Dever’s “Trademark Cross”
Matt Schmucker
Matt Schmucker
525 A Street NE | Washington, DC 20002
_______________________________________________________________
Dear Matt,
I have contemplated [no pun intended] your email and have sorted through many thoughts in regard to it. I have also consulted the coalition. A decision has been made.
My first thought was Peter’s imperative to obey every ordinance of man; and the fact is, T4G has copyrighted an image of our Lord’s gospel and paid good money for it to maximize marketing effect. Since I am not a New Calvinist, I will go ahead and “leap from the imperative to the command” without contemplating the indicative first. I hope that’s ok with you.
Another consideration was the fact that you could sue me because after I gave my life to Christ, I moved beyond the cross and shared it with other people only, and have not preached the gospel to myself every day. And as your friend Michael Horton has said, if we are saved by the gospel, “and move on to something else” we lose sanctification and justification both (Christless Christianity p.62). So, it wouldn’t be like taking another believer to court, right? Or is that to be taken literally? Does that mean the same thing in its “gospel context”?
However, since New Calvinists believe that any sin is fodder for church discipline (like non-attendance x256), and have authority over anyone who says “that Jesus is the Christ,” it occurred to me that Capitol Hill’s elders could bring me up on church discipline for believing a false gospel. Is that why you guys call it “redemptive church discipline”? And with the authority to declare me an unbeliever whether I am or not, well geez, that’s really scary. I bet you guys have a tight ship around there.
Now Matt, is this the first step of church discipline? I’m repenting, but do I have to get elder approval on that? Let me know.
Earnestly contending for the faith once delivered to the saints,
Paul M. Dohse Sr.
________________________________________________________________
Dear Sir, You have presumed much in your email like who my friends are and whether or not I have contemplated a lawsuit. I mentioned none of that and have simply asked you to stop using a design that you did not pay for and is trademark protected. Will you stop using it or not? I think that requires a simple answer, sir. I would appreciate a timely response. Sincerely, Matt Schmucker * * * * *Matt Schmucker** *Vice President, Together for the Gospel 525 A Street NE | Washington, DC 20002 ___________________________________________________________________________ Matt, You can call me "Paul." However, I commend you for respecting the elderly. You misunderstand, I said, "I'm repenting." I wasn't talking about "deep repentance" which would take a long time. Please interpret my email literally. We have changed the "logo." We have "repented." Not "deep repentance," I have no idea what "species of idol" caused me to do what I did. For crying out loud, it took John Piper eight months to find his. I have honored your request, but on the other hand, since I didn't do it the way David Powlison teaches, this change of heart may not be "real and lasting change." Maybe you could have him email me to give some advice on "reorienting the desires of my heart" [Matt, if you read this here, have him suggest which "X-Ray" questions I should ask myself as well]. Geez Matt, cut me a break, I'm tryin' to do the work here! I'm trying to "get used to my sanctification." paul




leave a comment