Paul's Passing Thoughts

Ephesians 5:22-33: The “Church” is NOT the Bride of Christ nor an Institution

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on January 9, 2016

We often hear references to the “institution of marriage.” However, evangelicals usually shy away from the idea of the “institutional church” because that detracts from the we are family motif that they want to portray. The church continually presents itself as a living body that has the market cornered on love while functioning as an institution.

In Ephesians 5:22-33, a passage often used to make the case that the church is the bride of Christ, the apostle Paul is making the following point: like the body of Christ is one body with many parts, the two married are also one body in the exact same way, like the body of Christ—like marriage.

The institutional churches and their marriages are train wrecks for the following reason: Christ’s body is not an institution, and marriage is not an institution, both are bodies. Evangelicals claim their local temples are bodies, but the smoking gun is authority versus love. Authority is the deal breaker. Consequently, almost every evangelical who reads this passage will interpret it as Christ having authority over His church, and in the same way, the husband has authority over the wife. And likewise, Christ has authority over the church because He is the husband of the bride, viz, the church. NOT.

Where does this passage say those things anywhere?

No, like a real body, Christ is the head of the body in the same way that the husband is the head in the one-body marriage relationship. Um, actually, I use “relationship” in a manner of speaking—marriage is a body. “Head” is not used in regard to someone having authority over someone or something, it refers to the actual head of a body. I mean, read the passage for yourself and note what the words mean. in context.

As the head of your body, if you are wise, you make good choices because, “ For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church,  because we are members of his body.”

Get the picture? And look, if you want to say that you have authority over all of your body parts, like your heart, go ahead, but authority isn’t the point—love is. People submitting to your pseudo authority will not bring love to bear. Your heart will do what you want it to do if you, “nourish(es) and cherish(es) it, just as Christ does the church.” That means you eat heart-healthy foods etc.

And that is done with the word of God—the law of love—not condemnation.

Also husbands, if you want to know how to be one, merely study how Christ led his body. When did he ever demand submission? Where is it? Where are the verses? No, He persuaded, He led, He taught, He set the right example, He served need, He…“having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word,  so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish.”

That’s done by loving leadership, not being the boss.

Because of church orthodoxy, troubled Christian marriages usually come to you for advice with two things: the authority issue and two sets of condemnation lists. You know…“if she would just obey me,” or…“if he would just obey the elders,”…“we would have a good marriage.” Really? Well, that apes the words of every tyrant that ever lived.

Just stop it, and start living this way: “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.”

Husbands, leave your parents, and especially John Calvin, and cling to your wife. Wives, respect your husband—not the “under shepherds.”

Where are they in this passage?

paul

A Passing Thought on the Roles of Christian Women in the Church

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on February 17, 2012

Funny, this website was originally designed to tweet “passing thoughts.” Obviously, it’s more like passing books and essays instead. Recently, I have made  some friends with those who are active in proclaiming the equality of women in the church. Ok, I will just be honest here, the mere stating of  that invokes visions of the second century feminists who ran through the streets of Corinth topless while spearing pigs. And I understand they wore helmets also. However, I have also thought about how delightful it would be for such a group to show up at this year’s T4G conference. I would even be willing to supply pig costumes free of charge to keynote speakers. Of course, under the guise that it is a great way to show our total depravity and worthlessness before God. Farfetched? Well, you ever heard of the “Scream of the Damned”?

I received an email yesterday from one such friend and browsed some of the links that were supplied. Nervously, I might add. Why the curiosity? I will tell you. I am concerned with an issue I have seen in New Calvinism for some time , but there is so much major error in the movement that I have not had time to address it; namely, the gargantuan expectations on men in regard to leading their families. I have watched this for some time and strongly suspect that I know what is behind it. As Yoda would say, “Suspect strongly, I do.”

Sorry, but I have watched this long enough to make a charge: control, it’s a control tactic. The lightbulb switched on when I was watching a how to be a good husband video by Mark Driscoll. Halfway through, I thought, “Geez, when would you have time to study the word of God and teach it to your family?” Then the next thought was, “duh.”  According to Cultwatch.com, one of the primary elements of a cult is “time control.” That rings a bell with me. While attending a dinner that I was invited to by concerned parents of a young man who attended a New Calvinist church, one of their primary concerns was, “They always have something going on; everything he is learning is coming from them corporately or from an invited speaker. We have wanted to question him about this church, but there is no time; he is always there!” Exactly.

Then consider the movement’s position on women bloggers and those who show discernment. I have written a few articles on this. I am just really uncomfortable with the whole  busy husbands and silent women in the kitchen motif. And as far as the women’s role? The Scriptures are clear, no man sits at the city gates without a Proverbs 31 wife. And husbands with Koolaid drinking wives only appear to be sitting at the city gates—they are really the gates of appeasement and cowardliness.

So, I partook in a flyby of the material. Some initial points were made that caught my attention. I will be back, with my hand on my spiritual wallet, but also with curiosity fueled by disturbing trends that I see concerning the roles of women in the church.

paul