The James MacDonald White Paper: Repost from the Elephants Debt .com; Post 3 of 20
A fifth church has separated from the Harvest Bible Fellowship.
On the 10th of February 2013, James MacDonald and the leaders of HBC held a meeting for the staff and lay-leaders of the church. Among other issues that were discussed, MacDonald shared his thoughts regarding congregationalism as a form of church governance. You may recall that back in June of 2011, MacDonald posted an article on his blog entitled, “Congregationalism is from Satan.” This hyperbolic blog post was nothing other than his personal response to Winnetka Bible Church’s second vote declining Harvest’s offer to be absorbed into the Harvest Bible Fellowship. In his most recent comments on the subject, MacDonald informed the leaders that congregationalism was undermining Christian Barbosu’s ministry in Romania, leaving Harvest Metanoia on unstable footing. Even if one is willing to believe that congregationalism is partially responsible for the troubles in Romania, it would be grossly unfair to the situation on the ground to only cite Congregationalism for the troubles in Romania.
On the 11th of February, 2013, The Elephant’s Debt was contacted by an individual with strong ties to Harvest. According to this source, a member of Harvest Metanoia (Romania) had recently translated The Elephant’s Debt from English into Romanian; and was passing the site around within the local congregation. According to other sources that are active in the congregation, Metanoia’s Senior Pastor, Christian Barbosu, attempted to calm the growing storm by preaching a sermon on the topic of MacDonald’s character. According to these sources, the congregation was reportedly distressed over MacDonald’s admission of gambling and his excessive salary.
Compounding the problem was the fact that Metanoia had only two years prior discovered that their senior pastor, Christian Barbosu, was being compensated from the United States. What made this particularly troubling to the conservative, Eastern European congregation was that they had been sacrificially giving so that their pastor might have an average salary according to Romanian standards of living. They knew nothing of Barbosu’s support coming from the United States; and were greatly troubled by their pastor’s failure to inform them of this practice.
Since these revelations, Christian Barbosu has willingly resigned from the pastorate, and two former elders who had left the church in protest were brought back to lead the congregation. Since the change in leadership, Metanoia has severed ties with Harvest Bible Fellowship, maintaining their association with the Baptist denomination. For further details, you can visit their homepage, which can be translated here via Google translator.
Since the initial publication of this post, a reader informed us that Christian Barbosu replanted a church on the 26th of February, 2013, in Arad, Romania, the same city as Metanoia. Also, the Harvest Bible Fellowship web page indicates that the Arad, Romania HBC will be “launching” in 2013. It is not clear from either website the nature of the relationship between Barbosu’s new church and HBF.
So once again, MacDonald is leaving his congregation ill-informed and ill-equipped to ask meaningful questions about the affairs of Harvest Bible Chapel and the Fellowship that it leads.
[And from other sources….]
As some have speculated online and elsewhere, it appears that the fallout from the “Elephant Room 2” continues to rain down on James MacDonald, Harvest Bible Chapel and the evangelical world. Late yesterday, Harvest Bible Chapel of Prescott Arizona, one of the largest plants in the Harvest Fellowship, became the second church to publicly announce its withdrawal from the Harvest Bible Fellowship. According to the official statement issued by Pastor Skip Breyer and the Elder Board,
“[Over the last 11 months], we have repeatedly and privately expressed our concern with the leaders of Harvest Bible Fellowship. After many months of prayer and consideration, we have reached a point in time that we believe to continue our association with HBC Chicago would appear to be endorsing their decisions, which would cause confusion for the flock that is under our care. So it is with a heavy heart, out of what we see is our obedience to our responsibility to our Lord to care and shepherd His flock, that we must end our association with HBC Chicago.”
NOTE FILE SHARING WIDGET FOR THIS SERIES ON BOTTOM RIGHT SIDE PANEL
The James MacDonald White Paper: “Why Not Name the 13 Accusations?” Post 2 of 20
In this video, Harvest elders claim transparency, but do not explain the 13 accusations brought against them by three other elders. They want the congregation to assume that none of the 13 accusations have merit just because they say so. This point doesn’t even scratch the surface of the treachery found in their words overall. Moreover, in the introduction, James MacDonald makes the claim that elder majority speaks with the authority that is directly from God. My friends, the only authority that speaks directly for God is His truth found in holy writ.
Pastor James MacDonald: I am so thankful to be a part of this church. This church is such a great blessing to me and our family and I just want to remind you that God has entrusted a spiritual authority to the local church and every local church has an authority under God. We believe that the Bible that the authority of the church is vested in the elders. And that when the elders speak collectively in agreement, they speak for God to our church. That’s about as serious as serious gets. Here are four of the elders in our church that have a message for us that we would do well to take heed to, so listen very carefully. These four men are speaking on behalf of the entire elder board of our church on every campus – listen now.
From Left to Right:
My name is Paul Inserra.
My name is Steve Houston
My name is Randy Williams
My name is Jamie Harrison
Paul Inserra: All but one member meeting is successfully behind us. We come to you today further fulfilling our pledge for greater transparency with a sad but necessary message from our entire elder board of our church. We need to communicate with you regarding the discipline of two former elders and their combined effort with other former elders, all outside Harvest working to discredit our elder board and destroy our pastor.
Jamie Harrison: Three elders who broke with the rest of our 30-member elder board in June have continued to spread discord through their false and unrelenting viewpoint. It was unanimously rejected by the elders over many months and with finality in our June meeting. They made their point, we rejected their opinions, but they refused to submit to elder consensus, choosing instead to sew discord and create division. This is a very, very serious sin, one that we are told in Proverbs 6 that our Lord hates.
Steve Houston: This week, the elders received a letter with 13 accusations against our pastor and his integrity, all of which the elders have already unanimously rejected multiple times, nothing new, just a continued refusal to accept the consensus of the elders of Harvest Bible Chapel.
If these men would express even a fraction of the constant and ongoing grace and humility that we see so frequently in our pastor, they could move beyond their bitterness to healing. Their current refusal to do so is defiling many people and that is great sin.
Randy Williams: Scott Phelps and Barry Slabaugh have been notified that they are under church discipline and no longer welcomed in our church until they repent. A copy of our board resolution regarding their conduct was given to them personally, and can be seen online under Elder Updates. Please pray for their repentance and victory over persistent spirit of superiority and self-righteousness.
Paul Inserra: Together these men continue to lead and seditiously promote an attack on the credibility of the church elders, our governance of church staff and the integrity of our pastor.
Jamie Harrison: Their goal is to discredit our pastor and to divide this church and we call upon the people of the Harvest family to make sure this does not happen. This problem is not new.
As Paul said in 2nd Timothy 4, “Alexander, the coppersmith, did me great harm. The Lord will repay him according to his deeds. Beware of him, yourself; for he strongly opposed our message.”
Steve Houston: Church matters are not to be tried in the court of public opinion. Publicizing viewpoints rejected by the elder majority, for any reason, is satanic to the core and must be dealt with very directly. Those who have no standing in a local church, but continue to assault it from outside with factious messages must be rejected according to the word of God. We warn the people of Harvest Bible Chapel to separate themselves from these false messengers. Don’t stand in the middle, don’t seek to mediate. Please avoid these former Harvest elders at all cost, lest you incur great detriment to your own soul.
Randy Williams: To be clear, the elders of Harvest Bible Chapel – 30 men – who meet frequently and closely with Pastor James and know first-hand his character and conduct, want you to hear that we the elders of Harvest Bible Chapel are completely satisfied with Pastor James’ growth and grace, including the way he responded to the three dissenting elders from January through June, and sought reconciliation with former elders as directed. Pastor James has gone out of his way repeatedly, to seek counsel, submit to consensus, and welcome and even solicit contrary opinion for the betterment of the church. The elders of Harvest stand behind his character and integrity without reservation or ongoing concern of any kind. Great pains have been taken to review and learn from these accusations. But there are no ongoing issues of any kind. We are satisfied and grateful to our pastor for his Christ-like behavior.
Steve Houston: We call upon the people of Harvest Baptist Chapel to support these actions of the elder board as biblical. Titus 3:10-11 says, “as for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is warped and sinful; he is self condemned.”
Also 1st Timothy 5:20 says, “as for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, [which, is, what we are doing] so that the rest may stand in fear.”
Randy Williams: Before honor, comes humility. In one week, we gather in one service to celebrate God’s amazing 25-year faithfulness to this church, but God is winning a mighty victory in and around us today. Nothing is covered, nothing is unresolved, nothing is ongoing – only this attack from the enemy. Let us examine ourselves, for unconfessed sin and seek to live in fear of the Lord, lest bitterness overtake us.
NOTE FILE SHARING WIDGET FOR THIS SERIES ON BOTTOM RIGHT SIDE PANEL
The James MacDonald White Paper: “2 or 3 Elders in Christ’s Name”; Post 1 of 20
“I want to begin this twentyf-part white paper by encouraging the former elders of Harvest that have been persecuted by the New Calvinist weapon of choice, bogus “redemptive church discipline.” We will be looking at this issue very closely in this series. Take heart, you are the two or three gathered in Christ’s name. Let me explain.”
Pastor James MacDonald didn’t get up one morning and decide to become a spiritual tyrant. His life is now bearing the fruit of his ideology. I have chosen to clear my schedule and focus on his behavior as overseer of Harvest Bible Chapel. This is because his present behavior, the culmination of indoctrination, is a classic model of how New Calvinist ideology functions and the inevitable results that always follow.
In my six years of research on New Calvinism, three of those fulltime, I have never seen a more neatly arranged motif of New Calvinism’s inevitable despotism.
Harvest Bible Chapel is the same show that has been played out innumerable times throughout church history and on a daily basis in our day. The pattern of behavior that follows the exact same script is uncanny. It is an underground version of Calvin’s theocracy restrained by an open society. Be certain of this: illusions to modern juggernauts and human catapults speak of a heart-lust that can only want in this culture. It is a restless evil that must settle for character assassination in the stead of burning stakes, the gallows, and the guillotine.
Many still follow MacDonald, and will continue to follow him, and we will discuss why in this series. Our purpose is simple: future prevention, and learning how to be better Christians through antithesis. James MacDonald is an antithetical example of how we should not do ministry and think about others.
There is no hope for Harvest Bible Chapel. But if we are wise, we can learn from the autopsy. Once a ministry goes down this antinomian road, there is no return. Those at Harvest who have not yet soiled their garments must come out from among them. Those presently involved must let the dead bury their dead. On the other hand, the situation must be fully exploited for its educational value. For those presently involved, it is far from being a tragedy that will not bear abundant fruit.
Right now, I am reproducing media that has come out of Harvest that I think will eventually disappear; particularly, the infamous “5 Things….” sermon. I have reproduced the video (pretty decent quality) in a windows format, and the audio in wma, wav, and mp4. I am also in the process of having the sermon transcribed. At least one post will delve deeply into the lives and video produced by the four elders at Harvest. The post will be entitled “The factious Four.” If the Lord so allows, their treachery dressed in the demeanor of Mr. Rogers will be recorded on the internet for future posterity. Any follower of James MacDonald should be as infamous as he is. Maybe more so. These men certainly act like men of renown; therefore, I will do all I can to make their fruits widely known among God’s people for better or worse.
I want to begin this twenty-part white paper by encouraging the former elders of Harvest that have been persecuted by the New Calvinist weapon of choice, bogus “redemptive church discipline.” We will be looking at this issue very closely in this series. Take heart, you are the two or three gathered in Christ’s name. Let me explain.
In Matthew 18, we have the familiar process of going to the one who has offended you alone, then returning with one or two witnesses if necessary. If the offender will not listen, “tell it to the church.” NO ONE is excluded from that process, especially elders. But after the finality of the process, and seemingly for no reason at all except for a poorly structured narrative, Christ states this:
18 Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. 19 Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything they ask, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven. 20 For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.
Why would Christ drop that in there out of nowhere? Why wouldn’t He speak of the congregation agreeing on the matter? And by the way, there is NO mention of elders in this passage anywhere. Why not? So what is this passage teaching? It is teaching that TRUTH is the authority, not the elders or the congregation. The “two or three” speak directly to the second step before it goes to the congregation. Surely, if the elders are paramount figures in this process, Christ would not have excluded a reference to them accordingly. Christ is saying that he stands with those who are in the truth regardless of what the congregation does. Those standing in the truth have Calvin’s “power of the keys,” not sinning, Reformed elders. They are to be rebuked publically by those standing in the truth.
And this is exactly where the former elders of Harvest find themselves. The sinning elders of Harvest are speaking continually of “elder consensus.” Where is such in Matthew 18? The binding of heaven is on the few, not the majority. They must know Christ stands with them, not James MacDonald. And those in that congregation will do themselves good by recognizing that as well.
We will learn much together for the sake of elders who find themselves in this situation hereafter. Lord willing, a suggested course of action will not give a majority of sinning elders undue authority.
Please pray for this project, and give thanks to those who love the truth; the embattled Harvest elders. Refer to them as elders, not former elders. Their love for the truth is their sterling qualification.
paul
NOTE FILE SHARING WIDGET FOR THIS SERIES ON BOTTOM RIGHT SIDE PANEL
INS Repost: “What’s in a Name? Part 2”
What’s in a Name?, Part Two
Last week we published an article on our blog explaining why, even though it grieves us, we were in favor of the name change the NANC board was asking us to ratify at our annual conference next month. If you have not read that article it might be helpful for you to read it before proceeding here. I came to that position only after assurances that the name change is in no way intended to be a repudiation of Dr. Adams and what he has taught about nouthetic counseling, especially in his foundational books on counseling.
Then, this past weekend, a communication appeared in my inbox from NANC promoting this change. My heart sank as I read the explanation for dropping the word “nouthetic.” It contradicted the assurances I had received about not repudiating nouthetic counseling as taught by Dr. Adams and revealed a lack of understanding of what nouthetic counseling is. It did, however, confirm me in my opinion that we should indeed change the name so as to conform to what is indeed the reality—that NANC is no longer nouthetic.
Here is that paragraph:
First, the word nouthetic is a perfectly good Greek word, which most people simply do not understand. Most of us in NANC spend more time explaining the meaning of a Greek word than we intend to when we mention the name of our organization. Once people understand the meaning of the term it does not help us that much. The term means “to confront or admonish,” and this only describes a narrow slice of the kind of counseling endorsed by NANC. Of course biblical counselors admonish people in their sin, but at NANC we also encourage our counselors to comfort the fainthearted, help the weak, pray, encourage, instruct, take care of their physical bodies, and 101 other things the Bible says to do. In its precise meaning the word nouthetic is a truncated expression of the many and varied counseling styles that God communicates in Scripture.
Let’s unpack this. First we have this statement:
the word nouthetic is a perfectly good Greek word.
No, “nouthetic” is an English word coined by Dr. Adams in the late 1960’s and explained carefully in his bookCompetent to Counsel. Its etymology is Greek and it is derived from the Greek word that can be transliterated “noutheteo” in its verb form or “nouthesia” in its noun form. But it is an English word. The email defines it like this:
The term means “to confront or admonish.”
Because the English was confused with a Greek word it is unclear which is meant here. While “confront” and “admonish” are two possible translations of the Greek word they do not explain the robust and colorful nature of the word and neither translates it literally. Noutheteo is a compound word blending nous (“mind”) and tithemi(“to place” or “to lay”) producing a word that literally means “to place (or lay) on the mind.”
In Competent to Counsel Dr. Adams goes to great length to demonstrate that Paul uses the term to communicate how he gently and compassionately counseled those to whom he ministered. In Acts 20:31 it is something he did “with tears.” In 1 Cor. 4:14 he did it as though his readers were his “beloved children.” In 2 Thess. 3:15 he did it in a serious situation “as a brother.” In Ephesians 6:4 it is what fathers are to do with their children.
Anyone curious about the definition of the Greek word can consult any number of reference works for help. TheTheological Dictionary of the New Testament (Kittle) has a thorough discussion that is quite helpful. Better still, one can read Competent to Counsel pp. 41 – 56 where Dr. Adams does the research for us. Long before Dr. Adams became well known for his work in the area of counseling he had become an accomplished Greek scholar having studied Koine and Classical Greek under the foremost scholars of the day at Johns Hopkins University.
But none of this is the point, however. The issue before us is the English word “nouthetic,” not the Greek word from which it was derived. Before casting this vote we should be sure we understand what exactly this word means that we are discarding. At about the same time NANC was founded Dr. Adams wrote a short book entitled What About Nouthetic Counseling in which he sought to set straight many of the canards his critics had devised. This is how Dr. Adams says he used the word:
I have used the word nouthetic . . . simply as a convenience by which the biblical system of counseling that has been developed in such books as Competent to Counsel and The Christian Counselor’s Manual might be identified most easily.
So while Dr. Adams derived the English word “nouthetic” from the Greek word “noutheteo” it was understood by him, and each of the men who founded NANC, to be shorthand for that system of biblical counseling taught by Dr. Adams in his foundational books. Adams was concerned that supporters would attach some awkward adjective like “Adamsonian” or “Adamsian” to it so he preempted them with the word “nouthetic.” The assertion that the term “nouthetic” means “to confront or admonish” is spurious.
So let’s get this clear:
Nouthetic counseling is that system of counseling that is defined by and flows from the foundational books written by Dr. Jay Adams.
Continuing from the NANC email:
Most of us in NANC spend more time explaining the meaning of a Greek word than we intend to when we mention the name of our organization.
Every form of counseling practiced on the planet has an adjective attached to it—Freudian, Adlerian, Rogerian, Humanistic, Existential, Jungian, Cognitive, Behavioral, et al. Each requires that the practitioner be able to explain his method to those who inquire. Pity the poor counselor who has to explain his Gestalt therapy! Why is it a burden too great to bear for us to explain Nouthetic Counseling?
Listen again to Dr. Adams from page 52 of Competent to Counsel:
I have no great zeal for the label “nouthetic” beyond its obvious advantages. However, since every school of thought eventually must be identified by an adjective, I should prefer to choose that adjective for myself. The importance of the word, however, as describing a regulative central activity involved in the ministry of the Word should not be missed.
The name of our organization (The Institute for Nouthetic Studies) includes the word “Nouthetic” as well and I have it stitched onto the polo shirts I wear. Several years ago at Christmas my daughter gave me a vanity plate for my pickup bearing the word “nouthetic.” I get questions about it everywhere I go and I have never considered it a burden. It has opened the door to a number to wonderful conversations. I even had one person pull up beside me at a stop light and ask what it means. I gave a two sentence explanation before the light turned green!
If you find explaining the term difficult let me help. Next time you are asked try this:
It is derived from the word the Apostle Paul used in the Greek New Testament to describe the kind of counseling he did. We use it to communicate that our counseling flows from our understanding of what Paul and the other biblical writers taught.
Now if that quick explanation elicits more questions, GREAT! I have a two minute version, a five minute version, and a ten minute version. If there are still more questions I can launch, with great glee, into my 30 minute lecture! If, however, one does not himself understand what it means, it would indeed be difficult to explain it to others.
But regardless of how heavy a lift it may seem for some to explain positively what we mean by “nouthetic” counseling it is a far lighter load than explaining negatively what we are NOT when we use the term “biblical.” With this change it will become necessary to clarify that we are NOT like the scores of others who use the term “biblical” promiscuously. That will be true, of course, only if we really are different and want to be seen as different.
The paragraph continues:
. . . this only describes a narrow slice of the kind of counseling endorsed by NANC. Of course biblical counselors admonish people in their sin, but at NANC we also encourage our counselors to comfort the fainthearted, help the weak, pray, encourage, instruct, take care of their physical bodies, and 101 other things the Bible says to do.
This is a sad and unfortunate assessment. To claim that nouthetic counseling does not “comfort the fainthearted, help the weak, pray, encourage, instruct, take care of their physical bodies, and 101 other things the Bible says to do” is inexcusable and dishonors Jay Adams. This “more compassionate than thou” attitude must end. Even a cursory reading of Competent to Counsel, The Christian Counselor’s Manual, or More Than Redemption should convince any skeptic these are spurious charges. In these books there are entire chapters about prayer and comfort. Adams has written entire books about instruction and encouragement.
In its precise meaning the word nouthetic is a truncated expression of the many and varied counseling styles that God communicates in Scripture.
This is just not true. Again, because the English and the Greek words have been confused it is not clear what is meant. The English word does indeed encompass all “the many and varied counseling styles that God communicates in Scripture.”
It is in the final paragraph that we get insight into the real issue here:
Because “NANC” is in our constitution it cannot be changed without the approval of our membership.
It seems clear that if the word “nouthetic” was not a part of our constitution the board would have made this change unilaterally and merely announced it to the membership. In my naïve desire for peace and unity in NANC circles I have not come forward widely with my concerns about the actions of our board. As a result the board has become confirmed in their direction and we have come to this place. Let me now correct what I should have reported more widely before now.
A little over three years ago the NANC board was “confronted and admonished” because they were not following the constitution. This was manifest in two important areas. First was in the makeup of the board. In the previous two years three veteran men retired from the board—Jay Adams, Wayne Mack, and John McConaughy. The constitution required that these men be replaced unless there was a vote of the general membership not to. Yet the board decided they would not be bound by the constitution and refused to replace them. This had the effect of concentrating decision making into the hands of a fewer number of men.
Second was the matter of finances. The constitution required that an annual budget be submitted to and approved by the general membership each year and that a financial report for the previous year also be submitted. Neither was done and all financial matters were handled behind closed doors. Thus, when one influential board member asked NANC to help fund a Biblical Counseling Coalition the board considered themselves free to give him $30,000 for this project. The constitution required that such an expenditure be part of a budget approved by the general membership. It was not. Nor was it ever reported to the general membership.
Rather than conform to the constitution when confronted about these irregularities they decided instead to ambush the general membership with several amendments to the constitution at the next annual meeting. I use the word “ambush” purposefully as there was no advance notice given that there was to be a vote on amendments. The amendments were not made available prior to the meeting. Members were not even given a copy at the meeting. Instead they were flashed on an overhead screen. When I asked to see a copy one day before the meeting I was refused. Because the general membership desired to trust and follow the board’s leadership the amendments passed and the board became a completely autonomous, self-appointed, self-perpetuating entity that no longer had to answer or report to anyone outside of itself on any matter. Thus NANC is now an organization in which the general membership has no voice or input on any issue—save this one.
We are poised on the precipice of a slippery slope. Others have lost their footing and plummeted down the hill before us. One well known example should be instructive. CCEF was founded by Dr. Adams in 1968 to serve as a kind of laboratory as he developed his counseling model. Today, CCEF has so far distanced itself from Adams that Ed Welch can “shamelessly” write that CCEF has “never identified itself as Nouthetic but steered a more moderate course” (Transformative Encounters, IVP, 2013).
Let me reiterate what I said in my last article. I love NANC. I am grateful for the ministry it has had to me and that I have been able to have through it. I continue to count our new Executive Director as a friend and I know, in spite of these differences, he will continue to befriend me. I know he desires the best for NANC and is burdened to see positive changes in the days to come. I do believe, however, this proposal is an unfortunate distraction at a time when at least a dozen more pressing issues require attention. I am glad, however, that it has given me an opportunity to clarify what exactly is meant by “Nouthetic Counseling.” Understand also that what I have written here are my views. Even though I work closely with Dr. Adams he has not contributed to this article. He has endured far more slings and arrows in his lifetime than those I report here. Sadly, in the past those projectiles have largely come from his integrationist critics. These days they are launched by his friends.
In light of this you may ask, “OK, so what should we do now?” Well, my advice is that you should come to Alabama in October, enjoy the conference, and vote. If you are happy with the direction NANC is going and have confidence in the board you should, of course, vote yes on their motion. If these things concern you and you believe there remains the possibility that NANC can be steered back to its nouthetic roots you can vote no.
It is my view that NANC’s orientation is irremediable. I would love to be proven wrong. From my own selfish and self-serving perspective, this change will help us at the Institute for Nouthetic Studies preserve the integrity of the term “nouthetic.”
Finally, I believe this proposal lays open an undo concern many of our leaders have about what our critics think of us. We can reassure each other as we talk among ourselves that nothing is changing with this vote and how much we appreciate our founder. But regardless of how many press releases we issue about this change, these critics will see it as a repudiation of Dr. Adams and the stand those who founded NANC took supporting him. It will be difficult to refute them.


2 comments