Paul's Passing Thoughts

Galatians 2:20 – Does Christ Live Our Life For Us?

Posted in Uncategorized by pptmoderator on November 19, 2015

Originally posted June 10, 2014

pdf  Trifold: Gal 2.20 trifold

A passive approach to Christian living has not served the Western church well. Few will disagree that Protestantism is predicated on the idea that the Christian life should be lived out in the same way we were saved, by faith alone. By far, the most popular proof text for this is Galatians 2:20;

I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me (ESV).

On its face, the verse does seem to say that we are dead and unable, and Christ is living out our lives for us and through us. The English Standard Version, a Neo-Reformed translation, adds to the idea by excluding the following words that are underlined:

I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me (KJV).

The apostle Paul is saying that there is a sense in which we are dead, but also alive. How can we be both alive and dead? The crux of the problem in interpreting Galatians 2:20 is a Protestant propensity for confounding  justification and the Christian life. Galatians 2:20 is not addressing the Christian life, it is addressing justification. This should be evident because Paul addresses the subject of justification specifically in the immediate context several times (three times alone in Galatians 2:16, Galatians 2:17, 2:21, 3:8, 3:11, 3:24, 5:4). Note what Paul states in the verse immediately following verse 20:

I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose.

The word for “justified” (dikaioō) and the word for “righteousness” (dikaiosynē)mean the same thing. Paul’s point is that Christ “died” in vain if justification is by the law. By “law,” Paul is not referring to an astute observation of the finer points of the law, but the traditions of men that propagate salvation by some ritual, and a dumbing down of the finer points of the law for maintaining salvation through additional rituals (Gal – 2:3, 2:12, 2:17, 2:19, 4:10,11, 4:21, 5:2, 5:3, 5:6, 5:11, note 5:2-5:5 as a summary of these ideas).

Paul is not saying that Christians are dead in the Christian life, and it is Christ alone living through us, he is saying that Christians are dead to the law for justification. Christians died with Christ, but are also resurrected with Christ. Hence, Galatians 2:20 begins with… “I have been crucified with Christ.” Christ died to end the law’s ability to condemn us (Rom 4:15, 5:13, 6:8, 8:1,10:4). We are no longer under its jurisdiction (Rom 7:1-6).

In regard to our justification only, we are, and remain dead while Christ lives, but this does not include the Christian life in which we are alive and new creatures. The usual rendering of Galatians 2:20 makes justification and the Christian life the same thing. Justification is a finished work, while we are continually separated from our old self by learning God’s law and obeying it. That’s commonly referred to as “sanctification.”

Gal 2:20 is ONLY talking about justification. Making Gal 2:20 about the Christian life is tantamount to rejecting half of the gospel pictured in baptism:

Romans 6:3 – Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.

And frankly, it also keeps the believer under law instead of under grace (Rom 6:14). If we are not now able to keep the law as a way of loving Christ and others, the law of the Spirit of life has not set us free from the law of sin and death:

Romans 8:2 – For the law [nomos] of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law [nomos] of sin and death.

The law now becomes the Spirit’s instrument of changing us (Jn 17:17, Gal 5:7 Rom 6:6). Our death with Christ stripped the law’s ability to condemn us for we are no longer UNDER it, but what many miss is the fact that being under grace means that we are now able to obey the law in order to please God (Romans 8:1-8).

To be under grace is to be under the law of the Spirit of life. The aforementioned rendering of Galatians 2:20 makes the law of the Spirit of life and the law of sin and death the same thing, and rejects the freedom from the law of sin and death made possible by the new birth (regeneration, or quickening).

This is why Galatians 2:20 is rendered that way accordingly: the “Christian” is still under law (being yet dead), and Jesus must therefore keep the law of sin and death for the believer. This is what drives the idea that Galatians 2:20 applies to the Christian life, BUT the law of sin and death has been ENDED by our death with Christ. We are no longer under its jurisdiction (Rom 7:1-4)—Christ does not need to fulfill the law of sin and death for us, that law was ended by Christ (Rom 10:4). Said rendering turns the gospel completely upside down and rejects the new birth. If the law of the Spirit of life and the law of sin and death are the same, “Christians” are still under the law of sin and death.

Moreover, take note as well that Paul doesn’t say the Galatian error was trying to be sanctified by the law; the error is an attempt to be “justified” by the law (5:4). If Paul’s primary issue with the Galatians was an attempt to apply the law to sanctification in order to justify themselves, why wouldn’t he simply state it plainly?

The real issue in Galatians was a justification by ritual, and a ritualistic dumbing down of the law in order to maintain salvation. This is necessary when the law of sin and death is not properly understood as ended, and replaced with the law of the Spirit of life.

The real issue in Galatians is a justification by ritual, and a ritualistic dumbing down of the law in order to maintain salvation. This is necessary when the law of sin and death is not properly understood as ended, and combined  with the law of the Spirit of life.

In fact, the law of the Spirit of life is redefined as something done by Christ instead of the Spirit using the “perfect law  of liberty” to change us (James 1:25, Matthew 7:24-27).

John MacArthur’s Utterly Delusional Assessment of Roman Catholicism, Part 2

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 18, 2015

blog-radio-logo

The Protestant Pot Calling the Catholic Kettle Black 

Saturday 11/21/2015 @ 4pm. Podcast Link: Utterly Delusional: John MacArthur’s Assessment of Roman Catholicism part 2

Paul will evaluate a sermon preached by John MacArthur Jr. in 2005 against Roman Catholicism. While this sermon serves as a typical Protestant rebuttal against Catholicism, it also serves to show how Protestantism is guilty of the exact same biblical anomalies not excluding the gospel. Paul and Susan will be addressing MacArthur’s evaluation in light of documented Protestant orthodoxy, not the typical misunderstanding among Protestants regarding its true documented beliefs. Paul will be referencing the Heidelberg Disputation and the Calvin Institutes throughout.

The audio and transcript of the sermon can be found here: http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/90-291/the-pope-and-the-papacy?Term=Are%20Catholics%20saved

Something to Ponder: The Night Real Death Visited a Celebration of Death

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 18, 2015

EODM“Can we, or should we, separate death and evil as an entertainment theme from the true reality of death and evil?”

It’s safe to assume that if most Christians really don’t understand justification, and they don’t, they understand sanctification even less. Sanctification deals with Christian living after salvation, and the wisdom thereof. More specifically, it’s knowledge in loving God and others.

The manual for such wisdom is the Bible, or in other words, the law (see Gal 3:21-23). Elsewhere in Scripture, the antithesis of love is a direct rejection of Scripture, or what we call antinomianism (Greek: anomia). This is the word translated “lawlessness” in Matthew 24:12, or without law (anomia).The process in Matthew 24:11,12 is worthy of notation: cold hearts are the result of people being led astray from the law by false teachers. In the latter days, the days we are in, this will involve “many.” This is why the flippant discernment among Christians in our day, and an overall inability to think drives me nuts, and in my estimation, the very reason that love is lacking in the church. In fact, the one’s labeled “unloving” among Christians are those who call for holding leaders accountable. Think about this: are we obligated to obey “God’s anointed” if they are leading us into lovelessness? How many of the guys in Matthew 24:11 insist that we “put ourselves under the authority of Godly men”? No, you never trade love for obedience to men and their definition of love whatever that might be.

In Romans 2:12-16, we find that the works of the law are written on the hearts of every individual born into the world along with a conscience that speaks words to the mind. These words that come from the conscience either accuse or excuse. Therefore, the law, or law-like principles inform the judge, ie., the conscience. Based on this, I buy into what I heard a police detective say: “Psychopaths aren’t born, they’re made.” Information intake makes the judge, and a person is the product of the judge speaking to their minds. This is what you are doing when you read to your children at bedtime: you are informing and training their judge.

Of course, this is critical in regard to the spiritual development of our children, and I am not sure where this interconnects with the actual salvation of our children, but the apostle Paul seemed to have a radical view of right thinking for all professing Christians. He demanded that EVERY thought, that is “every” thought, be taken captive, interrogated, and brought into alignment with the law of love (2Cor 10:5). Furthermore, it was Paul’s objective to “destroy” EVERY…mere opinion? This is very interesting in light of an accusation leveled against me on a continual basis: “Why do have to over-think everything?” And in addition, “Why do you have to argue about everything? Oh, here we go again, Paul thinks that error—go figure!”

So this post is some more “over-thinking.” I’m not much for do’s and don’ts and the condemnation thereof, but I wonder in light of the law of love: should Christians celebrate death? Should Christians continually seek out contradictory thinking in their lives? Based on the fact that we are commanded to take every thought captive, the answer to the latter is probably, “yes.”

This is where the recent terror attack in Paris has me pondering, specifically in regard to the attack on the Bataclan Concert Hall where the band, “Eagles of Death Metal” were playing. Can we, or should we, separate death and evil as an entertainment theme from the true reality of death and evil? You make your own observations, but I find myself pondering the visitation of real death and evil on a celebration of, well, death and evil. Whether the answer is yes or no, what are the implications for our lives and even the functioning of our conscience? Are the two categories of entertainment theme verses reality something that can really be completely separate? If nothing else, this is a question pertinent to our youth, no?

Aside from the fact that it goes without saying the act was horrific, consider the opening song that was playing when the terrorists entered: “Kiss the Devil.” Some of the lyrics follow:

Who’ll love the devil?…
Who’ll song his song?…
Who will love the devil and his song?…
I’ll love the devil!…
I’ll sing his song!…
I will love the devil and his song!…
Who’ll love the devil?…
Who’ll kiss his tongue?…
Who will kiss the devil on his tongue?…
I’ll love the devil!…
I’ll kiss his tongue!…

Wow, just wow. This whole scenario is just stunning to think about. Is there a lesson here somewhere? What does the Bible, the law of love say about the devil? It says “He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.” And, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning” (Jn 8:33 KJV). So, as this song was being played to the jubilant crowd, those who share this lust for murder walked in and begin mowing people down with assault rifles who just moments before were celebrating the father of murder. This is indeed a bizarre scene.

But let’s consider other hits by this band that more than likely would have been played that night. Here are the lyrics of “Midnight Creeper,”

Well I come in through your window
I see your family there
Yes I’m the midnight creeper
When I go creepin y’all better beware
Well Your child is gently sleeping
Pleasant dreams are in his head
That wife of yours is a sweet young thing
When I leave your wife’ll be dead
Well my steel is sharp and silent
The devil guides my hand
Well I just love to slit them throats
And creep all around this land

Somebody help me out here. What is the logical disconnect that would have kept the concert-goers from actually embracing the terrorists? In fact, one survivor initially thought the attack was part of the show. Are celebrant thoughts of murdering children simply cool, and not their own deaths? For Christians, does death as an entertainment theme fall into the category of love, or at least liberty?

Phil 4:8,9 says to dwell on “lovely” things and peace will follow. Perhaps that’s something to think about in all of this.

paul

Evil

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 18, 2015

Kevin DeYoung: Assurance Comes from Elders Proclaiming You Saved; 12 minutes

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on November 17, 2015