Paul's Passing Thoughts

A major theme of church orthodoxy that has completely taken over the evangelical church is the supremacy of Christ. Of course, Christ is central to salvation, but this view clearly relegates the Father and the Spirit to insignificant roles for salvation and even reality itself, at least when compared to Christ. Even the mainline modern-day prince of preachers, John MacArthur, has suggested that preaching about “anyone” or “anything” other than Christ takes away from sanctification. Indeed, the historical-redemptive hermeneutic used by easily 95%+ of all evangelical pastors posits the idea that every verse in the Bible is about Christ directly or indirectly. Ten to fifteen years ago, this idea was even getting significant pushback within evangelical circles, but when the church is fundamentally seen as having authority over salvation on earth, those who pound the pulpit the hardest within the church community are eventually going to win the argument. This is because the audience is captive; where else are they going to get salvation? And if the John MacArthurs of the world don’t capitulate, they would have to get a real job, so….

Yes, Solus Christus, or “Christ alone,” one of the 5 solas, really means just that; Christ alone…period. The specifics of what makes the Father and the Spirit insignificant is left to anyone’s guess as the method used for making Christ the only relevant soteriological figure is the out of sight out of mind communication technique. Clearly, it’s everything Jesus. The answer to every question in church is, “Jesus.” Somewhere around eight years ago, I wrote an article suggesting that the Father and the Spirit had a role in salvation and was labeled as “totally off the reservation.” Indeed. In addition, I could make millions being a Christian song writer. Watch: “Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, oh Jesus. Jesus wow, and wow Jesus.”

The idea came from Martin Luther, there is no doubt about that,  but what links it to the progressive justification tenets of double imputation, mortification and vivification, and the vital union? I don’t know.  At least part of it is linked to the Neo-Platonist/Gnostic ideas of bad gods and good gods. God the Father created the material world and is the god of wrath, and Jesus is the good god of grace that comes and saves us from the god of wrath; so obviously, in that scenario Jesus is who we would want to focus on. This idea was specifically endorsed in Rick Holland’s book, Uneclipsing The Son; a book forwarded by John Macarthur and endorsed by the who’s who of evangelicalism. Though no one wants to face up to it, most of the church fathers were unabashed Gnostics and the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree.

However, there is at least one safe bet: Christocentrism is probably the largest block in the wall against a literal biblical new birth in which all three members of the Trinity are efficacious. The biblical new birth infuses the righteousness of God into humanity resulting in a new state of being which is anathema to the Platonist worldview and antithetical to John Calvin’s total depravity.

Of course, proponents of solus Christus have a myriad of Bible verses that “prove” their point. And of course, verses that prove the contrary point can be supplied as well, but there is irony here that must be pointed out. Christocentrism, even in a cursory observation, is really law-centrist. The overt logical conclusion is that the law is a fourth member of the Trinity. In other words, Christocentrism strikes at the very heart of what the apostle Paul spent his whole ministry fighting against; a justification by the law. Paul argued that there is only “one seed,” but if there is a law than can give life, that would be more than one seed. A primary tenet of double imputation is Jesus came and obtained his righteousness through perfect law-keeping which qualified him to be an acceptable substitution for the penalty of sin. Furthermore, his perfect law-keeping must also be progressively imputed to the Christian life in order to maintain justification. No law, no salvation. Doesn’t that make the law more important than Jesus? Sure it does.

Protestantism is perhaps the most ironic religion in the world; while claiming to be the antithesis of a justification by the law, it is the epitome of such and the overt anti-Pauline soteriology of the ages.

paul

Live Link: Galatians Sunday Bible Study 11/24/2019 @ 11am

From tomorrow’s notes:

“Look, bottom line, if you sin, you are under the Old Covenant and yet a slave in the household who has not received an inheritance. To say that Christians sin is to say that no death occurred. Anyone who sins is under the Old Covenant. Here is the only real “imputation” in the Bible; the imputation of all sin to the Old Covenant. If you sin, you are under that covenant. Christian “sin” and everyday sin is not the same thing and to say that it is denies the cross altogether. To say that Christians are “sinners saved by grace” denies that the death of Christ redeemed us from sins committed under the Old Covenant. The only sin that can be committed against the New Covenant is to deny it by living under the old one. “

It’s difficult to watch people who don’t even know what the gospel is howl and moan over the prosperity preaching of Joel Osteen. It’s difficult to watch those who are complicit in spiritual tyranny, sexual abuse, and child rape criticize Osteen as no such scandals have ever visited his ministry. If it did, I think Osteen would take a scorched earth approach and fully cooperate with authorities immediately because it’s the right thing to do, and he’s smart.

In addition, you have Protestant Churchians attacking Osteen when the prosperity functioning of the evangelical church is covert. God forbid someone would be in the open about it. The medium income in zip codes where the Association of Certified Biblical Counselors offers its services is 50,000 and above. ACBC counselors are non-existent in income areas that are less. Go to any parking lot at any church on any given Sunday and look at the cars parked outside. Look, as a former evangelical pastor, I tried to bring the poor into the church on several occasions and at several different churches; it didn’t go well ever. Look at where evangelicals have their conferences, and check out John MacArthur’s Alaska cruise Bible study trips. Yet, he is the most visible critic of Osteen; the overt hypocrisy is stunning.

But an equally famous prosperity preacher, and close personal friend of Osteen, Joseph Prince, is avoided like the plague and appears nowhere on the evangelical “Ravenous Wolf” list. Why not?

Because he preaches the authentic Protestant gospel in unvarnished terms that people can understand and without nuance. Evangelicals don’t want to draw attention to Prince because there is a danger that he will clarify what Protestants don’t know about their own doctrine. I have written about this in detail here, and here.

As I cannot look at my Twitter account without seeing anti-Osteen material on a daily basis, I thought it was worth another mention.