Paul's Passing Thoughts

Comments by “Lee” Need a Response

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on February 15, 2012

If anybody thinks a thick skin comes with a ministry like this, you’re mistaken. New Calvinists are mean people, even compared to a street ministry I used to have both in Dallas, TX, and Dayton, OH. I can deal with most of them, but the comments that question my motives always trigger the reasons that I do this ministry to come to mind. More accurately, memories. Even then, I can deal with it, but why am I compelled to answer this particular accusatory comment? I think it is because my daughter is in Africa. Yes, it’s a family thing, and even more when it’s about your “little” girl. I will explain, but first, “Lee’s” comments are following:

What’s hilarious is that people like Passing Thought Paul and his sidekick Joel Taylor devote so much time and energy to displaying their garbage to anyone who will give them a look. I’m sure if Paul would let his thoughts linger a bit longer before he passes them out he would realize that neither the doctrinal nuances he obsessively defends nor the character of his “ministry” are the least bit biblical. I have not read a single article written by you “defenders of the faith” that is rooted in the pages of Scripture. You cry out “sola Scriptura” but your practice is to elevate both your interpretation of what people say and your interpretation of Christian doctrine to the place of authority. Yet, praise the Lord, you’re defending the faith and fighting the good fight. Give me a break.

You are the theological equivalent of a poorly dressed slut crying out for attention. “Look at me! Look at me! I want to be noticed!” I have never seen a self-promotion scheme more disgusting.

If Passing Thought Paul is anything like your side-kick Joel Taylor, you doesn’t even minister to real people. You have a “virtual ministry” that requires no messy contact with people. Nonetheless, the claim is that you care so much about the church that you just have to write about these things. Wrong. The only person you care about is yourself. I don’t have to know you to realize this is obvious.

This T4G guy is criticized for caring about a logo. Please remember that it is the clowns that started the “Coalition Against” that advertised they were developing a logo and who put together a logo and who stole a logo. If anyone deserves criticism over a logo it’s them.

Let me address Lee’s accusations (apart from the logo thing, I think it’s obvious what we were doing with that). I was saved in 1983 and have always been a fairly zealous Christian. My convictions are strong because of what I was saved from. As a child and young man, I experienced the impact of several divorces that occurred in my family. I remember the first one (when I was 9) like it was yesterday. So as a Christian, it is easy for me to hate divorce like God does.

Sometime around 1998, the founding pastor of the church I had been a member of for several years left for another ministry. An elder there took his place, and I endorsed him as a former elder and respected member of the church. The front door had barely hit the founding pastor in the backside when the preaching changed dramatically. In fact, several people left because of it, but I wrote it off as a style issue. What I didn’t know was that several parishioners noticed things I didn’t notice, and were being dealt with behind the scenes. There was a complete turnover of elders, and elder rule was put into place. Still, I had no problems with any of this and was also distracted with building a successful business at the time.

I will never forget what first alerted me to a problem. And let me pause here. At this point, there were absolutely no issues with me or anybody else in that church, and such is well documented. It happened during the introduction to a Sunday School class. The teacher stated emphatically, “The Old Testament is about Jesus Christ.” I thought, “Uh, ok, I’ll buy that, but what’s with all the bravado?” I started paying attention after that.  You ever seen the RCA dog commercial? That was me constantly, “Er?” What in the world was going on? I asked; it got me nowhere, so I started googling phrases. Finally, after connecting enough dots to have some grasp of what was possibly going on, I asked an elder the following question: “Are you guys teaching that we are sanctified by the same gospel that saved us?” Why wouldn’t he just say yes? Why wouldn’t they just meet with me and tell me what was going on? Why? Instead, his response was, “Paul, I am concerned that you are coming to a conclusion about what we are teaching from the internet.”

From there, things just started getting creepy and intense. It became obvious that they were teaching something new, and they weren’t going to reveal what it was. One night, three elders showed up at my front door unannounced. It was obviously done for shock and awe value. My emotional connection to the church was very strong. I had been there twenty years, had been a former elder there for five, and it’s the only church my children had ever known. All of the friends I had in the world were there, and I still trusted and respected the elders very much. And besides, had I been missing something all of those years? Maybe I needed what they were teaching, but how would I know if they wouldn’t tell me what it was!

Finally, I was told that I needed to mind my own business “and not worry about any doctrine they might be teaching or the hermeneutics that they were using.” Hermeneutics?! That’s what you use to interpret the Bible! As the leader of my home, I shouldn’t worry about that? During this time, and unknown to me, they were counseling my wife without my knowledge and teaching her that I was leading our family in a false gospel. They then began to use her to compile a detailed list of my private life, and also had her give them private files from my computer. They were particularity intimidated by my former friendship with an elder that had actually fled the state of Ohio to get his family away from them.

Long story short, I finally took my family and left. It was one of the most grievous things I have ever had to do in my life. About three days later, two elders came to my house and announced that I was under the first step of church discipline. Four reasons were given. I was dazed and confused. The whole ordeal had been surreal to begin with. But praise God, I had the presence of mind to tell them I wanted the charges in writing, and would make no official decision as to whether or not I would submit to the discipline until I had the charges in writing. Finally, that was done. Two ambiguous charges were put in writing, and one was more of a suggestion. The original four accusations were not put in writing. This is all documented. The counsel I received from other pastors was primarily the following: “Paul, this is really weird, but look, you have been there twenty years, go back and play their game for a month and then leave in peace.” Sounded good to me, but one month soon turned into four. I attempted to leave one time, and was told that I would be excommunicated if I did. I did not understand the church discipline process I was in, nor the counseling. I was confused, and often wondered if it was all a dream.

Finally, I was counseled by some pastors that I would have to leave at all cost. I left, and took my family to another Reformed church where my wife and I entered counseling. A couple of weeks later, the elders of my former church, without my knowledge or the knowledge of the pastor who was counseling us, issued a six page document telling my wife that I had been declared an unbeliever, and therefore had no authority in her life. They proceeded to instruct her to return to the former church with or without me. The document also told her that she was free to divorce me, and if she decided to, they would pay for it as well. In an act of abhorrent slander, when I was excommunicated, the parishioners were not given a reason, and were left to assume that I had committed adultery or something worse.

My daughter, who is a missionary and is presently 30,000 feet in the air somewhere between Amsterdam and Kenya, frantically pleaded with parishioners and pastors door to door to intervene, but to no avail. With tears, she begged people who had been her Awana teachers when she was four years old. The eventual divorce devastated my daughter and extended family, and my former wife is not allowed to visit our granddaughter until she leaves that church. It was made clear to me that the only way to save my marriage was to return to that church. Even my daughter and son-in-law, who certainly did not want to see the divorce happen, counseled against going back.

After the divorce, the church tried to separate me from my son through slander and showering him with gifts such as a laptop computer. I fought long and hard to maintain our relationship, and I’m overjoyed to tell you that he is presently living with Susan and me.  It’s true, as I am told by others, I can see it also, Heather is forever changed. That extra gear of joy that lit up a room when she entered it is no longer there. The former pastor married her and David, so the situation has even tarnished their wedding memories. I wonder if her endearment to Africa has something to do with being betrayed by American Christians. In her eyes, her family was ripped apart. And I suppose that is true.

My experience is not unique among those who question the “new Reformation” of New Calvinism. This ministry, yes, ministry, hears of  the testimonies often. Pastor Joel can correct me if I am wrong, but I called every move that his elders made before they made them. But he will soon tell his own story.

If only I had found a “Paul’s Passing Thoughts” website when I was in the midst of that confusing situation! I can’t even imagine! The elders just wouldn’t come clean, and the results were tragic. And folks, that’s why I am here. Not because I am a “slut begging for attention.” I inform confused people so that they can make informed decisions.

And this movement is false, cruel, and arrogant. So help me God, I will fight it with every ounce of strength my Lord gives me. They are fools born of Seventh-day Adventists drunk with visions of grandeur, and Lord willing, that will be made plain.

Please pray for my daughter and her family as they are in Kenya; please pray that my granddaughter can be united with her grandmother and please pray that our loving Lord will deliver churches from the evil clutches of New Calvinism.

paul

Southwood Situation Begs the Question: Why Do We Need the Presbytery?

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on February 15, 2012

It’s bittersweet. On the one hand, it’s refreshing to see everyday parishioners taking a hard stand for the truth. On the other, war is never pretty. Ironically, the book, The Truth War by John MacArthur Jr. (written when he still had his right mind), has probably influenced me more than any other book I have ever read other than the Bible. In fact, I wonder how much of that book has influenced what I am presently doing. Certainly, Southwood parishioners have taken such call to action seriously.

While perusing the website they have constructed, the lightbulb went on. If the laity must   stand for the truth on their own, research the truth on their own, and execute the truth on their own, what do we need the present-day presbytery for? No matter the denomination, what do they do other than take our money and use it to spread false doctrine?

One of the visions of The Coalition Against New Calvinism is a forum that will produce a shovel-ready church polity. This is because in many cities, New Calvinism is the only option for church—it’s all there is. This is the reality because leaders of our day are not taking care of truth business.

I had lunch with a pastor the other day who thinks the laity is fed-up,  and he thinks a movement by the laity may emerge; ie., home churches with lay pastors etc. No doubt, that’s inevitable unless things change.

paul

“Pastor” Mark Dever’s “Trademark Cross”

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on February 14, 2012

Dever_bwDear Sir,

It has come to my attention that you have begun using a logo that our organization paid to have designed and paid to have legally trademarked.  We would ask you to please immediately stop using the cross/logo that you are presently using in “The Coalition Against New Calvinism” logo and to remove all uses from your digital and printed material.
Sincerely,

Matt Schmucker

Matt Schmucker

Vice President, Together for the Gospel 

525 A Street NE | Washington, DC 20002

_______________________________________________________________

Dear Matt,

I have contemplated [no pun intended] your email and have sorted through many thoughts in regard to it. I have also consulted the coalition. A decision has been made.

My first thought was Peter’s imperative to obey every ordinance of man; and the fact is, T4G has copyrighted an image of our Lord’s gospel and paid good money for it to maximize marketing effect. Since I am not a New Calvinist, I will go ahead and “leap from the imperative to the command” without contemplating the indicative first. I hope that’s ok with you.

Another consideration was the fact that you could sue me because after I gave my life to Christ, I moved beyond the cross and shared it with other people only, and have not preached the gospel to myself every day. And as your friend Michael Horton has said, if we are saved by the gospel, “and move on to something else” we lose sanctification and justification both (Christless Christianity p.62).  So, it wouldn’t be like taking another believer to court, right? Or is that to be taken literally? Does that mean the same thing in its “gospel context”?

However, since New Calvinists believe that any sin is fodder for church discipline (like non-attendance x256), and have authority over anyone who says “that Jesus is the Christ,”  it occurred to me that Capitol Hill’s elders could bring me up on church discipline for believing a false gospel. Is that why you guys call it “redemptive church discipline”? And with the authority to declare me an unbeliever whether I am or not, well geez, that’s really scary. I bet you guys have a tight ship around there.

Now Matt, is this the first step of church discipline? I’m repenting, but do I have to get elder approval on that? Let me know.

Earnestly contending for the faith once delivered to the saints,

Paul M. Dohse Sr.

________________________________________________________________

Dear Sir,
You have presumed much in your email like who my friends are and whether or
not I have contemplated a lawsuit.  I mentioned none of that and have
simply asked you to stop using a design that you did not pay for and is
trademark protected.  Will you stop using it or not?  I think that requires
a simple answer, sir.  I would appreciate a timely response.
Sincerely,
Matt Schmucker

*
*
*
*
*Matt Schmucker**
*Vice President, Together for the Gospel
525 A Street NE | Washington, DC 20002

___________________________________________________________________________

Matt,
You can call me "Paul."
However, I commend you for respecting the elderly. You
misunderstand, I said, "I'm repenting." I wasn't talking about "deep repentance" which
would take a long time. Please interpret my email literally.  We have changed the "logo."
We have "repented." Not "deep repentance," I have no idea what "species of idol" caused me
to do what I did. For crying out loud, it took John Piper eight months to find his. I have
honored your request, but on the other hand, since I didn't do it the way David Powlison
teaches, this change of heart may not be "real and lasting change." Maybe you could have
him email me to give some advice on "reorienting the desires of my heart" 
[Matt, if you read this here, have him suggest which "X-Ray" questions I should ask myself
as well].
Geez Matt, cut me a break, I'm tryin' to do the work here! I'm trying to "get used to my
sanctification."

paul

New Calvinism’s Onslaught Against the Plain Sense of Scripture: Romans 15:14-22

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on February 13, 2012

Romans 15:14-21 is yet another portion of Scripture that exposes several different New Calvinist errors within eight verses or less. This is indicative of the fact that New Calvinism is saturated with error.

Verse 14 is a glaring contradiction to the often heard rants by New Calvinists that the saints are totally depraved. The apostle Paul states the following in verse 14:

I myself am convinced, my brothers and sisters, that you yourselves are full of goodness, filled with knowledge and competent to instruct one another.

I honestly cannot think of any statement that could contradict New Calvinism more than this statement by the apostle. Another contradiction in the same verse is Paul’s emphasis on counseling (noutheteho) each other. The idea is that we are to warn each other, instruct each other, remind each other, reprove each other, etc. A far cry from preaching the gospel to ourselves and supposedly teaching others to do the same. Counseling involves far more than having knowledge of the gospel.

Paul continues in verse 15:

I have written you quite boldly on some points to remind you of them again, because of the grace God gave me….

“Some points”? What points? Why wouldn’t he want to continually remind them of the gospel? The same question is begged of 2Peter, chapter 1 where Peter reminds them of seven things, excluding the gospel.

Verse 16:

….to be a minister of Christ Jesus to the Gentiles. He gave me the priestly duty of proclaiming the gospel of God, so that the Gentiles might become an offering acceptable to God, sanctified by the Holy Spirit.

Paul now shifts the subject to his primary ministry as an apostle: to lead Gentiles to the Lord. Notice his emphasis on all three members of the Trinity in regard to the gospel; “a minister of Jesus Christ”; the “gospel of God,” and the “sanctification by the Holy Spirit.” The strong emphasis on Christ alone in salvation is predominant in New Calvinism.

Verses 17-19:

Therefore I glory in Christ Jesus in my service to God. 18 I will not venture to speak of anything except what Christ has accomplished through me in leading the Gentiles to obey God by what I have said and done— 19 by the power of signs and wonders, through the power of the Spirit of God. So from Jerusalem all the way around to Illyricum, I have fully proclaimed the gospel of Christ.

Notice Paul writes that “what I have said and done” played a role in Gentiles coming to Christ. What about the following New Calvinist claim?—being a testimony is an attempt to “be the gospel rather than sharing the gospel.”

Verses 20-22:

It has always been my ambition to preach the gospel where Christ was not known, so that I would not be building on someone else’s foundation. 21 Rather, as it is written: “Those who were not told about him will see, and those who have not heard will understand.” 22 This is why I have often been hindered from coming to you.

This is why we call the gospel “good news” and why Paul wanted to preach where Christ was NOT KNOWN. You see, once people hear the good news, it’s no longer news! This would seem evident. Also, Paul saw the gospel as a FOUNDATION, and because God didn’t want to continue to build on a foundation that had already been laid, “I have often been hindered from coming to you.”

  1. The total depravity of the saints is contradicted.
  2. Lack of emphasis on counseling/instruction is contradicted.
  3. The continual reminding of the gospel is contradicted.
  4. The devaluing of  God and the Holy Spirit in salvation is contradicted.
  5. The devaluing of godly behavior in presenting the gospel is contradicted.
  6. The good news as perpetual news is contradicted.
  7. The continual building of the gospel foundation is contradicted.

 

paul

Tagged with:

Another Open Letter to Fellow Southern Baptist Peter Lumpkins

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on February 13, 2012

“Let me put it in perspective for you Peter: imagine Mark Driscoll as president of the SBC and CJ Mahaney as president of Southern Seminary.”

Sent by email on 2/13/2012:

Peter,

Greetings. I hope this email finds you well my friend. I saw your article about “aggressive Calvinism” (aka New Calvinism) and how they are partaking in hostile takeovers of Southern Baptist churches. Your complaint is that they are not upfront going in about what their theology is. Their less than full disclosure doesn’t include the fact that what they believe has the name “Calvinist” in it for fear that they would be rejected out of hand. Poor souls are therefore deceived into attaining a pastor who is a New Calvinist, and in the same kind of situation, is why Hillary Clinton looks so good to us right now after the real Barak Obama has been revealed. I can tell you about a Presbyterian church in Alabama who would love to have a real Calvinist running the show right now.

As stated in my addendum (“The Southern Baptist Connection”) to The Truth About New Calvinism, this organized, hostile takeover has been in full swing since the early 80’s. Al Mohler and company probably distance themselves from Founders Ministries because they are only one step removed from the connection to The Australian Forum.  New Calvinism is based on the doctrine that came from the Forum, which believed they had recovered the original Reformation gospel. It is my contention that a former Presbyterian and founder of Founders Ministries became a Southern Baptist for the sole purpose of bringing this “new reformation” into the SBC. Covertly, using the name of a famous Southern Baptist who would have been horrified by their doctrine.

New Calvinism is ecumenical because all that matters is an acclamation to the Forum’s, the centrality of the objective gospel outside of us. Everything else is secondary because real and lasting transformation only comes from Gospel Contemplationism anyway. Supposedly. Certainly, I do not have to make a case for this as the inclusion of everything but the kitchen sink is apparent in T4G, and the Together for the Gospel crowd.

Though they pretend to oppose the emergent church movement, they approach the Scriptures in the exact same way: the Scriptures are a historical gospel narrative that we put our life story into. New Calvinists believe that is mostly done through contemplation—emergent folks believe that is done primarily through taking action and participating in the narrative, often bringing a charge of works salvation from the other side because it is working in the narrative verses contemplating it. But both believe that the Scriptures are an exclusive personal narrative about Christ, and therefore, drawing propositional truth/cognitive principles from it for purposes of life application is an inappropriate use of the Scriptures. In a shocking display of  diss-discernment, MacArthur masterfully articulates this complaint against the emergent church while at the same time describing the same approach that his newfound New Calvinist pals hold to (The Truth War pages 13-22; also see How People Change by Paul David Tripp, page 27).

In fact,  MacArthur targets John H. Armstrong specifically on those pages in Truth War, who was also one of the movers and shakers in the movement that created Founders Ministries! Come now Peter, look at Acts 29’s involvement with Southern Baptist churches. It’s not only emergent, but was spawned by the spiritual children of Dr. John “Jack” Miller, the father of Sonship Theology that is founded on the Forum’s doctrine.

Which brings me to the name change being proposed in SBC circles. That spells certain death for the SBC—it is part of the plan. Removing “Baptist” from our name paves the way for Charismatics, Emergents, Seventh-day Adventists, you name it to be involved in the everyday activities of the SBC.  Let me put it in perspective for you Peter: imagine Mark Driscoll as president of the SBC and CJ Mahaney as president of Southern Seminary.

Peter, it’s gut-check time for Southern Baptist. I have a meeting with my pastor this afternoon. Should our church continue to contribute to the Cooperative Fund which is well on its way to being taken over by spiritual misfits?

Not in my book.

paul