Paul's Passing Thoughts

…it is true they were Christians, but they were primarily sons of the Enlightenment, and they held man as an effective, potent, rational creature. The founders of our country were effective men. They believed in the effectiveness of human existence. This is in absolute defiance of historical orthodoxy. There is no way you can massage historic Augustinian-Lutheran-Calvinist orthodoxy into rational, competent, successful men. It’s not possible. The practical outworking is in the United States man’s exposure to the Dark Ages was directly centered around the Puritan doctrine, and it was that same Puritan doctrine that the Founding Fathers made an overt effort to separate from government and, in many instances, to defeat.

See conference videos and full transcript here.

Link for All of John Immel’s Conference Sessions 

FULL TRANSCRIPT

People who truly love truth are rare. Truth-loving is the basis for all unity. The day I met Susan I perceived that she is a sincere truth-lover and therefore knew she was the one. Love of truth is the unity guarantee. A marriage between two truth-lovers will endure all things.

And, truth-lovers can be persuaded with facts.

Scandalous emails are trending, especially in politics. The following is a scandalous email between Andy Young and I about six years ago. It’s scandalous because it is an actual documentation of someone being persuaded. Among professing Christians, that’s rare because facts don’t matter—only celebrity spiritual authorities matter. To say that Protestants don’t have their own Ex cathedra is to live in utter denial.

This email is a lynchpin for discussing justification. It should be studied and discussed at length. About two years ago, Andy and I spent several hours trying to find this stream but couldn’t. Earlier today, in an answer to prayer several weeks ago, I stumbled onto it.

The conversation starts a little off target, but then plunges into the depths of the law’s relationship to justifcation.

Tip: hold control button down and press the + button to enlarge your screen view to make jpegs easier to read.

It has been some time since I posted on the Furry Fandom sect. I have written 17 articles that are prequels to my forthcoming book, Fake Fandom. I am a very busy person, older, and trying to redeem wasted years, so, I pick my projects carefully.

The big struggle with this project was the Furry motif, which exudes harmlessness while the extreme opposite is true; this is a deeply evil and dangerous sect, particularly for children. It is the epitome of a Trojan horse.

The similarities in dealing with Furries and my experience researching cults and spiritual tyranny are uncanny. Furries, exactly like spiritual tyrants, attempt to control their adversaries through condemnation. If you can destroy a person’s self-esteem (a truthful self-assessment) and self-confidence, you can control them. Present Furry attacks on me are, therefore, very familiar and attacks I have been dealing with for more than ten years.

And remember, when people attempt to condemn you through various and sundry accusations, the catalog comes from their own life. They accuse you of faults they are familiar with because they are guilty of those faults themselves. What people accuse you of is a window into their own lives when the goal is to neutralize you through condemnation. Since they don’t know you, they must choose accusations they are familiar with.

FYI, even if everything they are hounding me with is true, I am still going to publish the book and let the folks decide. I have stopped responding to the attacks and are merely compiling the rants for data purposes. These misfits are emailing me with, on average, four different aliases, and even posing as researchers from other countries. It is a completely unhinged mosaic.

Hopefully, the book will aide child advocates where applicable. Presently, when Furries come up in situations regarding children, the issue is dismissed as irrelevant. Even Dr. Phil McGraw deems the sect as a “hobby.” This view of Furries flows from a stunning ignorance that supplies cover for imminent danger to children.

In considering the threat level, I was on the fence for some time, but thanks to the many who have contacted me with information and offers to assist in research, I now understand the depth of this threat. I look forward to working with them to warn others.

Paul Dohse