Paul's Passing Thoughts

The New Calvinist Takeover of Southwood Presbyterian Church, Part 22: Movies, Songs, Stories, and Denial of the New Birth

Posted in Uncategorized by Paul M. Dohse Sr. on January 14, 2012

“Hence, because we are supposedly just as wicked as we were before the salvation that is completely outside of us, we can only dance with Jesus or Clem Snide…. dancing to the desire for damnation and an escape from being saved. I am incredulous that intelligent people who name the name of Christ allow this man to stand behind the sacred desk under their roof of worship.” 

On January 8, JL3 continued his series on “Scandalous Obedience.”  I look forward to the privilege of critiquing tomorrow’s message as well. Is that the one where a visitor is going to come and lie about how mission works flow from the unfinished work of justification? I’m not sure.

Regarding the January 8 message on Romans 6:15-23, the text is not exegeted. The message is a constant string of movies, stories, songs, and one TV show from beginning to end. And biblical concepts are reframed to produce desired outcomes. For example, “obedience” which is rarely, if ever used with a modifier in the Scriptures, is now “Scandalous Obedience.”  What’s that? That’s obedience that flows from contemplating “grace” and is supposedly soooooooo much more radical than what the Bible would tell us to do subjectively via pesky imperatives. Like the sultans of New Covenant Theology constantly say: “You just can’t leap from the command to obedience.” If you let obedience be a “mere natural flow” from learning about grace in the Scriptures—your obedience will be a “Crazy Love” directly from the heart of Jesus and not the “dead letters of the law.”

No, no, we can’t have such leaping. As JL3 states in this message, obedience “flows” from focusing on “grace,” and, don’t miss this: JL3 is not called to “give you exact marching orders” in regard to what your “love” (radical obedience) “looks like.” We can only watch to see what happens after we use the Scriptures to “hear the voice of Jesus,” and “connect to His heart.” Jesus’ straightforward approach in the Sermon on the Mount of hearing the word, learning the word, and applying the word is replaced with, “hearing the voice of Jesus,” “connecting to Jesus’ heart,” and as pontificated constantly throughout the message; obedience is reframed as “dancing with Jesus.”

JL3 makes it clear in this message—there are only two kinds of dancing that Southwood parishioners can do: dancing with Jesus (his version of biblical obedience), or dancing according to who we really are as Christians. He uses the lyrics from the following song to illustrate who we are as Christians:

I was searching for something I could not describe

So I stared at the sun till the tears filled my eyes

Well I thought I was empty so I paid the cost

But now that I’m found I miss being lost

I opened my heart and I let Jesus in

With the promise that I would be free of my sins

But I only felt guilty that he died on the cross

Now that I’m found I miss being lost

I don’t wanna suffer and I don’t wanna die

I want the clouds parted in an endless, blue sky

But someone up there has a different plan

Now that I’m saved I wish I was damned

JL3 makes it clear after citing these lyrics from the song Jews for Jesus Blues by Clem Snide that this is the theology that we Christians dance to. He also said that his stories cited in this same message are further evidence of “how twisted and sick our hearts are.” Hence, because we are supposedly just as wicked as we were before the salvation that is completely outside of us, we can only dance with Jesus or Clem Snide. And how do we dance with Jesus? According to JL3: “Grace is the name on your dance card.” In other words, obedience by grace alone. The only other alternative is dancing to the tune of who we really are with the name of Clem Snide on our dance card—dancing to the desire for damnation and an escape from being saved. I am incredulous that intelligent people who name the name of Christ allow this man to stand behind the sacred desk under their roof of worship.

In an unbelievably lame attempt to manipulate the congregation, JL3 defends what he is teaching in this “sermon”; supposedly from the text, as NOT being legalism! It is clear that he thinks this congregation is all but completely brain-dead, or sees himself as intellectually superior, or both.

In the same way that he did in the first message, JL3 preys on the normative experience of most Christians in our American culture: attempting to do the right thing the wrong way, ie., stupid obedience verses intelligent obedience. JL3, in this message and many others, often refers to the Christian experience of continually falling into the same patterns of sin. Ie., stupid obedience. Of course, JL3’s ungodly teachings foster this experience further, and then enables him to use it as a citation for proof to further his evil agenda.

Not surprisingly, JL3 closed with another story. I am not going to rehearse the story, but it is a typical New Calvinist motif:

Oh well, we are all vile sinners saved by grace. You mean you won’t forgive your Christian wife for plotting to have you murdered for insurance money? Oh my! You must not understand grace and how much you have been forgiven. If you did, you would say, “I’m glad my wife tried to have me murdered; it reminds me that I would do the same thing if there was a life insurance policy on her.” No wonder you expect your elders to be perfect and object to us teaching antinomianism!

JL3 also closed with yet another either/or prism: either grace, or guilt. This goes along with New Calvinist tenet of the total depravity of the saints . We should reject guilt; grace is the answer. This is indicative of the severe danger this doctrine poses for Christians. The Bible continually presents guilt as a valuable tool in sanctification and a motivator to take objective action as a result. The cure for guilt is corrective action and a biblically trained mind, not “preaching the gospel to ourselves until we understand grace enough to vanquish guilt.” Dangerously, many New Calvinists teach that guilt is proof of a lack of understanding in regard to grace. Supposedly, if we truly understand the depths of God’s grace and the power of His forgiveness, we should never feel guilty. Guilt is a result of “living by lists,” etc.  I cannot even begin to articulate how dangerous this teaching is.

This is my prayer: “Oh God, deliver the church from this evil anti-word (Romans 6:19) doctrine.”

paul

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Joey's avatar Joey said, on January 14, 2012 at 10:15 PM

    Paul,

    I can tell you from personal experience that New Calvinist teaching about sanctification is dangerous. There was a point in my life where I was really struggling with certain sins and I was actually afraid to attempt obedience. If I obey because God tells me to, am I not being “fleshly”? Is this not to act in one’s own strength? Trying to obey, working to obey–didn’t seem like much of a “natural flow” to me. It seemed like hard work. But obedience isn’t supposed to be hard, is it? Well, I must be doing something wrong then. The solution? Begin contemplating the Gospel anew (for the thousandth and first time). Ugggggh.

    I think the worst part about about all the New Calvinist stuff is the way it paralyzes the believer. What hope is there of overcoming sin if I’m just as wicked as ever and still a slave to sin? What motivation is there for obeying God if my obedience does not please God? I tried NOT to think of my obedience as being pleasing to God for fear I would then be trusting in my own works (like the Judaizers). Finally I started reading the Bible for myself and saw that all this was bunk. Then I stumbled upon your site and things became clearer still. Thanks, Paul.

    Sorry if this whole post is out of sorts. I’m kinda in a rush. Just wanted to say a thing or two and to thank you for exposing New Calvinism. It needs to be exposed.

    Joey

    Like

    • Paul M. Dohse Sr.'s avatar paulspassingthoughts said, on January 15, 2012 at 12:41 AM

      Joey,

      Thanks. What you are saying is particular applicable in regard to depression.The last thing you need there is a let go and let God theology. “I can’t do anything” and “obedience is not curative” is a theology of hopelessness.

      Like


Leave a comment